Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: Current status and future prospects

Christiaan P van Lingen, Luigi M Zagra, Harmen B Ettema, Cees C Verheyen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings were re-popularised in the late 1990s with the introduction of modern hip resurfacing (HR), followed closely by large metal head total hip arthroplasty (THA). A worldwide increase in the use of MoM hip arthroplasty subsequently saw a sharp decline, due to serious complications.MoM was rapidly adopted in the early 2000s until medical device alerts were issued by government regulatory agencies and national and international organisations, leading to post-marketing surveillance and discontinuation of these implants.Guidelines for MoM hip implant follow-up differ considerably between regulatory authorities worldwide; this can in part be attributed to missing or conflicting evidence.The authors consider that the use of large-head MoM THA should be discontinued. MoM HR should be approached with caution and, when considered, should be used only in patients who meet all of the recommended selection criteria, which limits its indications considerably.The phased introduction of new prostheses should be mandatory in future. Close monitoring of outcomes and long-term follow-up is also necessary for the introduction of new prostheses. Cite this article: van Lingen CP, Zagra LM, Ettema HB, Verheyen CC. Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: current status and future prospects. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:345-353. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160014.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-353
Number of pages9
JournalEFORT Open Reviews
Volume1
Issue number10
Early online dateOct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: Current status and future prospects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this