Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation

G. L. Adani, A. Rossetto, D. Lorenzin, M. Lugano, D. De Anna, G. Della Rocca, A. Donini, V. Bresadola, A. Risaliti, U. Baccarani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (OLT), contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr) has been used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1; n = 19) versus CPAr (group 2; n = 21) among 40 consecutive OLT from heart-beating donors. There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, indication for OLT and donor parameters between the groups. OLT was performed using the piggyback technique. The biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases by a duct-to-duct technique with a T-tube in 32% versus 29% of cases without a T tube (P = .83). In the CPAr group, the liver was reperfused simultaneously via the portal vein and hepatic artery. CPAr showed a longer warm ischemia (66 ± 8 vs 37 ± 7 minutes; P <.001), while SPAr had a longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 vs 66 ± 8 minutes (P = .0004). Recovery of graft function was similar. There was no primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred among 10% versus 9%. Liver function tests were similar between the two groups up to 90 days case of follow-up- One-year graft and patient survivals were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P = .29). At a median follow-up of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months, biliary complications included anastomotic stenoses in 15% versus 19% (P = .78) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P = .01) for SPAr and CPAr, respectively. CPAr was safe and feasible, reducing the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1107-1109
Number of pages3
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Hepatic Artery
Liver Transplantation
Reperfusion
Pathologic Constriction
Ischemia
Tissue Donors
Delayed Graft Function
Transplants
Intrahepatic Bile Ducts
Warm Ischemia
End Stage Liver Disease
Liver Function Tests
Recovery of Function
Graft Survival
Portal Vein
Bile Ducts
Demography
Liver
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Adani, G. L., Rossetto, A., Lorenzin, D., Lugano, M., De Anna, D., Della Rocca, G., ... Baccarani, U. (2011). Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings, 43(4), 1107-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.123

Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation. / Adani, G. L.; Rossetto, A.; Lorenzin, D.; Lugano, M.; De Anna, D.; Della Rocca, G.; Donini, A.; Bresadola, V.; Risaliti, A.; Baccarani, U.

In: Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 43, No. 4, 05.2011, p. 1107-1109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adani, GL, Rossetto, A, Lorenzin, D, Lugano, M, De Anna, D, Della Rocca, G, Donini, A, Bresadola, V, Risaliti, A & Baccarani, U 2011, 'Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation', Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1107-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.123
Adani, G. L. ; Rossetto, A. ; Lorenzin, D. ; Lugano, M. ; De Anna, D. ; Della Rocca, G. ; Donini, A. ; Bresadola, V. ; Risaliti, A. ; Baccarani, U. / Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation. In: Transplantation Proceedings. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 1107-1109.
@article{6797d229da7c445e85d8cdc341b44235,
title = "Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation",
abstract = "Although sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (OLT), contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr) has been used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1; n = 19) versus CPAr (group 2; n = 21) among 40 consecutive OLT from heart-beating donors. There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, indication for OLT and donor parameters between the groups. OLT was performed using the piggyback technique. The biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases by a duct-to-duct technique with a T-tube in 32{\%} versus 29{\%} of cases without a T tube (P = .83). In the CPAr group, the liver was reperfused simultaneously via the portal vein and hepatic artery. CPAr showed a longer warm ischemia (66 ± 8 vs 37 ± 7 minutes; P <.001), while SPAr had a longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 vs 66 ± 8 minutes (P = .0004). Recovery of graft function was similar. There was no primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred among 10{\%} versus 9{\%}. Liver function tests were similar between the two groups up to 90 days case of follow-up- One-year graft and patient survivals were, respectively, 89{\%} and 95{\%} versus 94{\%} and 100{\%} (P = .29). At a median follow-up of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months, biliary complications included anastomotic stenoses in 15{\%} versus 19{\%} (P = .78) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 26{\%} versus none (P = .01) for SPAr and CPAr, respectively. CPAr was safe and feasible, reducing the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.",
author = "Adani, {G. L.} and A. Rossetto and D. Lorenzin and M. Lugano and {De Anna}, D. and {Della Rocca}, G. and A. Donini and V. Bresadola and A. Risaliti and U. Baccarani",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.123",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1107--1109",
journal = "Transplantation Proceedings",
issn = "0041-1345",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential versus contemporaneous portal and arterial reperfusion during liver transplantation

AU - Adani, G. L.

AU - Rossetto, A.

AU - Lorenzin, D.

AU - Lugano, M.

AU - De Anna, D.

AU - Della Rocca, G.

AU - Donini, A.

AU - Bresadola, V.

AU - Risaliti, A.

AU - Baccarani, U.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Although sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (OLT), contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr) has been used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1; n = 19) versus CPAr (group 2; n = 21) among 40 consecutive OLT from heart-beating donors. There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, indication for OLT and donor parameters between the groups. OLT was performed using the piggyback technique. The biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases by a duct-to-duct technique with a T-tube in 32% versus 29% of cases without a T tube (P = .83). In the CPAr group, the liver was reperfused simultaneously via the portal vein and hepatic artery. CPAr showed a longer warm ischemia (66 ± 8 vs 37 ± 7 minutes; P <.001), while SPAr had a longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 vs 66 ± 8 minutes (P = .0004). Recovery of graft function was similar. There was no primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred among 10% versus 9%. Liver function tests were similar between the two groups up to 90 days case of follow-up- One-year graft and patient survivals were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P = .29). At a median follow-up of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months, biliary complications included anastomotic stenoses in 15% versus 19% (P = .78) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P = .01) for SPAr and CPAr, respectively. CPAr was safe and feasible, reducing the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.

AB - Although sequential portal and arterial revascularization (SPAr) is the most common method of graft reperfusion at liver transplantation (OLT), contemporaneous portal and hepatic artery revascularization (CPAr) has been used to reduce arterial ischemia to the bile ducts. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare SPAr (group 1; n = 19) versus CPAr (group 2; n = 21) among 40 consecutive OLT from heart-beating donors. There were no differences in the demographics characteristics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, indication for OLT and donor parameters between the groups. OLT was performed using the piggyback technique. The biliary anastomosis was performed in all cases by a duct-to-duct technique with a T-tube in 32% versus 29% of cases without a T tube (P = .83). In the CPAr group, the liver was reperfused simultaneously via the portal vein and hepatic artery. CPAr showed a longer warm ischemia (66 ± 8 vs 37 ± 7 minutes; P <.001), while SPAr had a longer arterial ischemia 103 ± 42 vs 66 ± 8 minutes (P = .0004). Recovery of graft function was similar. There was no primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred among 10% versus 9%. Liver function tests were similar between the two groups up to 90 days case of follow-up- One-year graft and patient survivals were, respectively, 89% and 95% versus 94% and 100% (P = .29). At a median follow-up of 13 ± 6 versus 14 ± 7 months, biliary complications included anastomotic stenoses in 15% versus 19% (P = .78) and intrahepatic non-anastomotic biliary strictures in 26% versus none (P = .01) for SPAr and CPAr, respectively. CPAr was safe and feasible, reducing the incidence of intrahepatic biliary strictures by decreasing the duration of arterial ischemia to the intrahepatic bile ducts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957620197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957620197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.123

DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.123

M3 - Article

C2 - 21620064

AN - SCOPUS:79957620197

VL - 43

SP - 1107

EP - 1109

JO - Transplantation Proceedings

JF - Transplantation Proceedings

SN - 0041-1345

IS - 4

ER -