SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis

Luca Padua, Erik Stalberg, Mauro Lomonaco, Amelia Evoli, Annapaola Batocchi, Pietro Tonali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and objective: In typical cases, the patient's history and clinical examination make it possible to diagnose ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). But, in many cases a clear clinical picture is not present and OMG diagnosis is very difficult because gold diagnostic standard tests are not available. The diagnostic tests for OMG are usually unable to display a good sensitivity and specificity simultaneously. In this paper, we studied 86 cases submitted for suspected OMG. Methods: The patients were studied clinically and with various other tests used in OMG diagnosis (SFEMG, repetitive nerve stimulation, Ab anti AChR titration, tensilon test). Results and conclusion: SFEMG showed the highest sensitivity (100%) while Ab anti AChR showed the highest specificity (100%). To our knowledge this is the largest population of suspected OMG studied using most of the diagnostic parameters, reported in the literature. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1203-1207
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume111
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2000

Fingerprint

Myasthenia Gravis
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Edrophonium
Gold
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population

Keywords

  • Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody
  • Edrophonium
  • Neuromuscular transmission
  • Neurophysiology
  • Ocular myasthenia gravis
  • SFEMG

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Padua, L., Stalberg, E., Lomonaco, M., Evoli, A., Batocchi, A., & Tonali, P. (2000). SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111(7), 1203-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00307-2

SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis. / Padua, Luca; Stalberg, Erik; Lomonaco, Mauro; Evoli, Amelia; Batocchi, Annapaola; Tonali, Pietro.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 111, No. 7, 01.07.2000, p. 1203-1207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Padua, L, Stalberg, E, Lomonaco, M, Evoli, A, Batocchi, A & Tonali, P 2000, 'SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis', Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 1203-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00307-2
Padua L, Stalberg E, Lomonaco M, Evoli A, Batocchi A, Tonali P. SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2000 Jul 1;111(7):1203-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00307-2
Padua, Luca ; Stalberg, Erik ; Lomonaco, Mauro ; Evoli, Amelia ; Batocchi, Annapaola ; Tonali, Pietro. / SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2000 ; Vol. 111, No. 7. pp. 1203-1207.
@article{85989714f39444839a4606091a0b36fc,
title = "SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis",
abstract = "Background and objective: In typical cases, the patient's history and clinical examination make it possible to diagnose ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). But, in many cases a clear clinical picture is not present and OMG diagnosis is very difficult because gold diagnostic standard tests are not available. The diagnostic tests for OMG are usually unable to display a good sensitivity and specificity simultaneously. In this paper, we studied 86 cases submitted for suspected OMG. Methods: The patients were studied clinically and with various other tests used in OMG diagnosis (SFEMG, repetitive nerve stimulation, Ab anti AChR titration, tensilon test). Results and conclusion: SFEMG showed the highest sensitivity (100{\%}) while Ab anti AChR showed the highest specificity (100{\%}). To our knowledge this is the largest population of suspected OMG studied using most of the diagnostic parameters, reported in the literature. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.",
keywords = "Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody, Edrophonium, Neuromuscular transmission, Neurophysiology, Ocular myasthenia gravis, SFEMG",
author = "Luca Padua and Erik Stalberg and Mauro Lomonaco and Amelia Evoli and Annapaola Batocchi and Pietro Tonali",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00307-2",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "1203--1207",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SFEMG in ocular myasthenia gravis diagnosis

AU - Padua, Luca

AU - Stalberg, Erik

AU - Lomonaco, Mauro

AU - Evoli, Amelia

AU - Batocchi, Annapaola

AU - Tonali, Pietro

PY - 2000/7/1

Y1 - 2000/7/1

N2 - Background and objective: In typical cases, the patient's history and clinical examination make it possible to diagnose ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). But, in many cases a clear clinical picture is not present and OMG diagnosis is very difficult because gold diagnostic standard tests are not available. The diagnostic tests for OMG are usually unable to display a good sensitivity and specificity simultaneously. In this paper, we studied 86 cases submitted for suspected OMG. Methods: The patients were studied clinically and with various other tests used in OMG diagnosis (SFEMG, repetitive nerve stimulation, Ab anti AChR titration, tensilon test). Results and conclusion: SFEMG showed the highest sensitivity (100%) while Ab anti AChR showed the highest specificity (100%). To our knowledge this is the largest population of suspected OMG studied using most of the diagnostic parameters, reported in the literature. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

AB - Background and objective: In typical cases, the patient's history and clinical examination make it possible to diagnose ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). But, in many cases a clear clinical picture is not present and OMG diagnosis is very difficult because gold diagnostic standard tests are not available. The diagnostic tests for OMG are usually unable to display a good sensitivity and specificity simultaneously. In this paper, we studied 86 cases submitted for suspected OMG. Methods: The patients were studied clinically and with various other tests used in OMG diagnosis (SFEMG, repetitive nerve stimulation, Ab anti AChR titration, tensilon test). Results and conclusion: SFEMG showed the highest sensitivity (100%) while Ab anti AChR showed the highest specificity (100%). To our knowledge this is the largest population of suspected OMG studied using most of the diagnostic parameters, reported in the literature. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

KW - Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody

KW - Edrophonium

KW - Neuromuscular transmission

KW - Neurophysiology

KW - Ocular myasthenia gravis

KW - SFEMG

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034237540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034237540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00307-2

DO - 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00307-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 10880794

AN - SCOPUS:0034237540

VL - 111

SP - 1203

EP - 1207

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 7

ER -