Short direct repeats at the breakpoints of a novel large deletion in the CFTR gene suggest a likely slipped mispairing mechanism

Carmelina Magnani, Laura Cremonesi, Annamaria Giunta, Paola Magnaghi, Roberto Taramelli, Maurizio Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the cystic fibrosis conductance transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene a few small deletions and only a large, complex, 50-kb deletion have been described so far. We report a second large deletion, which had been hypothesized in a patient affected by cystic fibrosis on the basis of an abnormal pattern of inheritance of the intragenic microsatellites IVS17b/TA and IVS17b/CA. Southern blot analysis revealed the presence of an anomalous band in the patient and her father, in the region encompassing exons 13-19, approximately 0.6 kb shorten than the one present in normal controls, in addition to the band of the correct size. Cloning and sequencing the DNA fragments spanning the region of interest demonstrated the presence of a 703-bp deletion causing complete removal of exon 17b in the paternal cystic fibrosis chromosome. This analysis revealed the presence of two short direct repeats flanking the breakpoints. The 3' repeat partially overlapped the IVS17b/CA microsatellite and the number of CA repeated units present in the paternal cystic fibrosis allele was the shortest ever found among chromosomes so far analyzed. These data map suggest that the mechanism for the generation of the deletion may have involved a slipped mispairing during DNA replication, which has not previously been described in the CFTR gene.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-108
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Short direct repeats at the breakpoints of a novel large deletion in the CFTR gene suggest a likely slipped mispairing mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this