Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia: a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI Choosing Wisely Campaign

Ludovico Furlan, Luca Erba, Lucia Trombetta, Roberto Sacco, Giorgio Colombo, Giovanni Casazza, Monica Solbiati, Nicola Montano, Chiara Marta, Rodolfo Sbrojavacca, Francesco Perticone, Gino Roberto Corazza, Giorgio Costantino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reduction of the inappropriate use of antibiotics in clinical practice is one of the main goals of the Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) choosing wisely campaign. We conducted a systematic review of secondary studies (systematic reviews and guidelines) to verify what evidence is available on the duration of antibiotic treatment in Pneumonia. A literature systematic search was performed to identify all systematic reviews and the three most cited and recent guidelines that address the duration of antibiotic therapy in pneumonia. Moreover, a meta-analysis of non-duplicate data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) considered in the enrolled systematic reviews was performed together with a trial sequential analysis to identify the need for further studies. Two systematic reviews on antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for a total of 17 RCTs (2764 patients) were enrolled in our study. Meta-analysis of non-duplicate RCTs show a non-significant difference in rate of treatment failure between short (≤ 7 days) and long (> 7 days) antibiotic treatment course: RR 1.05 (95% CI, 0.82–1.36). The trial sequential analysis suggests that further data would not affect current evidence or become clinically relevant. Selected guidelines suggest consideration of a short course, with a low grade of evidence and without citing the already published systematic reviews. Antibiotic treatment of CAP for ≤ 7 days is not associated with a higher rate of treatment failure than longer courses and should thus be taken in consideration. Guidelines should upgrade the evidence on this topic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-394
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Pneumonia
Guidelines
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Treatment Failure
Meta-Analysis
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Antibiotic treatment
  • Choosing wisely
  • Guidelines
  • Infection
  • Pneumonia
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia : a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI Choosing Wisely Campaign. / Furlan, Ludovico; Erba, Luca; Trombetta, Lucia; Sacco, Roberto; Colombo, Giorgio; Casazza, Giovanni; Solbiati, Monica; Montano, Nicola; Marta, Chiara; Sbrojavacca, Rodolfo; Perticone, Francesco; Corazza, Gino Roberto; Costantino, Giorgio.

In: Internal and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2019, p. 377-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Furlan, Ludovico ; Erba, Luca ; Trombetta, Lucia ; Sacco, Roberto ; Colombo, Giorgio ; Casazza, Giovanni ; Solbiati, Monica ; Montano, Nicola ; Marta, Chiara ; Sbrojavacca, Rodolfo ; Perticone, Francesco ; Corazza, Gino Roberto ; Costantino, Giorgio. / Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia : a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI Choosing Wisely Campaign. In: Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 377-394.
@article{1b52f996e91e41cb9f91a4dab2871f37,
title = "Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia: a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI Choosing Wisely Campaign",
abstract = "Reduction of the inappropriate use of antibiotics in clinical practice is one of the main goals of the Societ{\`a} Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) choosing wisely campaign. We conducted a systematic review of secondary studies (systematic reviews and guidelines) to verify what evidence is available on the duration of antibiotic treatment in Pneumonia. A literature systematic search was performed to identify all systematic reviews and the three most cited and recent guidelines that address the duration of antibiotic therapy in pneumonia. Moreover, a meta-analysis of non-duplicate data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) considered in the enrolled systematic reviews was performed together with a trial sequential analysis to identify the need for further studies. Two systematic reviews on antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for a total of 17 RCTs (2764 patients) were enrolled in our study. Meta-analysis of non-duplicate RCTs show a non-significant difference in rate of treatment failure between short (≤ 7 days) and long (> 7 days) antibiotic treatment course: RR 1.05 (95{\%} CI, 0.82–1.36). The trial sequential analysis suggests that further data would not affect current evidence or become clinically relevant. Selected guidelines suggest consideration of a short course, with a low grade of evidence and without citing the already published systematic reviews. Antibiotic treatment of CAP for ≤ 7 days is not associated with a higher rate of treatment failure than longer courses and should thus be taken in consideration. Guidelines should upgrade the evidence on this topic.",
keywords = "Antibiotic treatment, Choosing wisely, Guidelines, Infection, Pneumonia, Systematic review",
author = "Ludovico Furlan and Luca Erba and Lucia Trombetta and Roberto Sacco and Giorgio Colombo and Giovanni Casazza and Monica Solbiati and Nicola Montano and Chiara Marta and Rodolfo Sbrojavacca and Francesco Perticone and Corazza, {Gino Roberto} and Giorgio Costantino",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s11739-018-1955-2",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "377--394",
journal = "Internal and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1828-0447",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short- vs long-course antibiotic therapy for pneumonia

T2 - a comparison of systematic reviews and guidelines for the SIMI Choosing Wisely Campaign

AU - Furlan, Ludovico

AU - Erba, Luca

AU - Trombetta, Lucia

AU - Sacco, Roberto

AU - Colombo, Giorgio

AU - Casazza, Giovanni

AU - Solbiati, Monica

AU - Montano, Nicola

AU - Marta, Chiara

AU - Sbrojavacca, Rodolfo

AU - Perticone, Francesco

AU - Corazza, Gino Roberto

AU - Costantino, Giorgio

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Reduction of the inappropriate use of antibiotics in clinical practice is one of the main goals of the Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) choosing wisely campaign. We conducted a systematic review of secondary studies (systematic reviews and guidelines) to verify what evidence is available on the duration of antibiotic treatment in Pneumonia. A literature systematic search was performed to identify all systematic reviews and the three most cited and recent guidelines that address the duration of antibiotic therapy in pneumonia. Moreover, a meta-analysis of non-duplicate data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) considered in the enrolled systematic reviews was performed together with a trial sequential analysis to identify the need for further studies. Two systematic reviews on antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for a total of 17 RCTs (2764 patients) were enrolled in our study. Meta-analysis of non-duplicate RCTs show a non-significant difference in rate of treatment failure between short (≤ 7 days) and long (> 7 days) antibiotic treatment course: RR 1.05 (95% CI, 0.82–1.36). The trial sequential analysis suggests that further data would not affect current evidence or become clinically relevant. Selected guidelines suggest consideration of a short course, with a low grade of evidence and without citing the already published systematic reviews. Antibiotic treatment of CAP for ≤ 7 days is not associated with a higher rate of treatment failure than longer courses and should thus be taken in consideration. Guidelines should upgrade the evidence on this topic.

AB - Reduction of the inappropriate use of antibiotics in clinical practice is one of the main goals of the Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) choosing wisely campaign. We conducted a systematic review of secondary studies (systematic reviews and guidelines) to verify what evidence is available on the duration of antibiotic treatment in Pneumonia. A literature systematic search was performed to identify all systematic reviews and the three most cited and recent guidelines that address the duration of antibiotic therapy in pneumonia. Moreover, a meta-analysis of non-duplicate data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) considered in the enrolled systematic reviews was performed together with a trial sequential analysis to identify the need for further studies. Two systematic reviews on antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for a total of 17 RCTs (2764 patients) were enrolled in our study. Meta-analysis of non-duplicate RCTs show a non-significant difference in rate of treatment failure between short (≤ 7 days) and long (> 7 days) antibiotic treatment course: RR 1.05 (95% CI, 0.82–1.36). The trial sequential analysis suggests that further data would not affect current evidence or become clinically relevant. Selected guidelines suggest consideration of a short course, with a low grade of evidence and without citing the already published systematic reviews. Antibiotic treatment of CAP for ≤ 7 days is not associated with a higher rate of treatment failure than longer courses and should thus be taken in consideration. Guidelines should upgrade the evidence on this topic.

KW - Antibiotic treatment

KW - Choosing wisely

KW - Guidelines

KW - Infection

KW - Pneumonia

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055017349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055017349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11739-018-1955-2

DO - 10.1007/s11739-018-1955-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055017349

VL - 14

SP - 377

EP - 394

JO - Internal and Emergency Medicine

JF - Internal and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1828-0447

IS - 3

ER -