Should the automatic exposure control system of CT be disabled when scanning patients with endoaortic stents or mechanical heart valves? A phantom study

Giovanni Di Leo, Chiara Spadavecchia, Moreno Zanardo, Francesco Secchi, Ivan Veronese, Marie Claire Cantone, Francesco Sardanelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the impact of endoaortic stents/mechanical heart valves on the output of an automatic exposure control (AEC) system and CT radiation dose. Methods: In this phantom study, seven stents and two valves were scanned with varying tube voltage (80/100/120 kVp), AEC activation (enabled/disabled) and prosthesis (present/absent), for a total of 540 scans. For each prosthesis, the dose-length product (DLP) was compared between scans with the AEC enabled and disabled. Percentage confidence levels for differences due to the prosthesis were calculated. Results: Differences between results with the AEC enabled and disabled were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.059). In the comparison with and without the prosthesis, DLP was unchanged at 80 kVp and 100 kVp, while a slight increase was observed at 120 kVp. The radiation dose varied from 1.8 mGy to 2.4 mGy without the prosthesis and from 1.8 mGy to 2.5 mGy with the prosthesis (confidence level 37–100%). Conclusions: The effect of the prosthesis on the AEC system was negligible and not clinically relevant. Therefore, disabling the AEC system when scanning these patients is not likely to provide a benefit. Key points: • CT-AEC system is not impaired in patients with endoaortic prostheses/heart valves.• Negligible differences may be observed only at 120 kVp.• Disabling the AEC system in these patients is not recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Radiology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Dec 12 2016

Fingerprint

Heart Valves
Prostheses and Implants
Stents
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Radiation

Keywords

  • Automatic exposure control system
  • Computed tomography
  • Endoaortic stents
  • Mechanical heart valves
  • Radiation dose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Should the automatic exposure control system of CT be disabled when scanning patients with endoaortic stents or mechanical heart valves? A phantom study. / Di Leo, Giovanni; Spadavecchia, Chiara; Zanardo, Moreno; Secchi, Francesco; Veronese, Ivan; Cantone, Marie Claire; Sardanelli, Francesco.

In: European Radiology, 12.12.2016, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1df949f4c2d140bea214440d1b9a77e9,
title = "Should the automatic exposure control system of CT be disabled when scanning patients with endoaortic stents or mechanical heart valves? A phantom study",
abstract = "Objectives: To estimate the impact of endoaortic stents/mechanical heart valves on the output of an automatic exposure control (AEC) system and CT radiation dose. Methods: In this phantom study, seven stents and two valves were scanned with varying tube voltage (80/100/120 kVp), AEC activation (enabled/disabled) and prosthesis (present/absent), for a total of 540 scans. For each prosthesis, the dose-length product (DLP) was compared between scans with the AEC enabled and disabled. Percentage confidence levels for differences due to the prosthesis were calculated. Results: Differences between results with the AEC enabled and disabled were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.059). In the comparison with and without the prosthesis, DLP was unchanged at 80 kVp and 100 kVp, while a slight increase was observed at 120 kVp. The radiation dose varied from 1.8 mGy to 2.4 mGy without the prosthesis and from 1.8 mGy to 2.5 mGy with the prosthesis (confidence level 37–100{\%}). Conclusions: The effect of the prosthesis on the AEC system was negligible and not clinically relevant. Therefore, disabling the AEC system when scanning these patients is not likely to provide a benefit. Key points: • CT-AEC system is not impaired in patients with endoaortic prostheses/heart valves.• Negligible differences may be observed only at 120 kVp.• Disabling the AEC system in these patients is not recommended.",
keywords = "Automatic exposure control system, Computed tomography, Endoaortic stents, Mechanical heart valves, Radiation dose",
author = "{Di Leo}, Giovanni and Chiara Spadavecchia and Moreno Zanardo and Francesco Secchi and Ivan Veronese and Cantone, {Marie Claire} and Francesco Sardanelli",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-016-4676-9",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should the automatic exposure control system of CT be disabled when scanning patients with endoaortic stents or mechanical heart valves? A phantom study

AU - Di Leo, Giovanni

AU - Spadavecchia, Chiara

AU - Zanardo, Moreno

AU - Secchi, Francesco

AU - Veronese, Ivan

AU - Cantone, Marie Claire

AU - Sardanelli, Francesco

PY - 2016/12/12

Y1 - 2016/12/12

N2 - Objectives: To estimate the impact of endoaortic stents/mechanical heart valves on the output of an automatic exposure control (AEC) system and CT radiation dose. Methods: In this phantom study, seven stents and two valves were scanned with varying tube voltage (80/100/120 kVp), AEC activation (enabled/disabled) and prosthesis (present/absent), for a total of 540 scans. For each prosthesis, the dose-length product (DLP) was compared between scans with the AEC enabled and disabled. Percentage confidence levels for differences due to the prosthesis were calculated. Results: Differences between results with the AEC enabled and disabled were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.059). In the comparison with and without the prosthesis, DLP was unchanged at 80 kVp and 100 kVp, while a slight increase was observed at 120 kVp. The radiation dose varied from 1.8 mGy to 2.4 mGy without the prosthesis and from 1.8 mGy to 2.5 mGy with the prosthesis (confidence level 37–100%). Conclusions: The effect of the prosthesis on the AEC system was negligible and not clinically relevant. Therefore, disabling the AEC system when scanning these patients is not likely to provide a benefit. Key points: • CT-AEC system is not impaired in patients with endoaortic prostheses/heart valves.• Negligible differences may be observed only at 120 kVp.• Disabling the AEC system in these patients is not recommended.

AB - Objectives: To estimate the impact of endoaortic stents/mechanical heart valves on the output of an automatic exposure control (AEC) system and CT radiation dose. Methods: In this phantom study, seven stents and two valves were scanned with varying tube voltage (80/100/120 kVp), AEC activation (enabled/disabled) and prosthesis (present/absent), for a total of 540 scans. For each prosthesis, the dose-length product (DLP) was compared between scans with the AEC enabled and disabled. Percentage confidence levels for differences due to the prosthesis were calculated. Results: Differences between results with the AEC enabled and disabled were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.059). In the comparison with and without the prosthesis, DLP was unchanged at 80 kVp and 100 kVp, while a slight increase was observed at 120 kVp. The radiation dose varied from 1.8 mGy to 2.4 mGy without the prosthesis and from 1.8 mGy to 2.5 mGy with the prosthesis (confidence level 37–100%). Conclusions: The effect of the prosthesis on the AEC system was negligible and not clinically relevant. Therefore, disabling the AEC system when scanning these patients is not likely to provide a benefit. Key points: • CT-AEC system is not impaired in patients with endoaortic prostheses/heart valves.• Negligible differences may be observed only at 120 kVp.• Disabling the AEC system in these patients is not recommended.

KW - Automatic exposure control system

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Endoaortic stents

KW - Mechanical heart valves

KW - Radiation dose

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003881346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003881346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-016-4676-9

DO - 10.1007/s00330-016-4676-9

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

ER -