Should the patella be everted during primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

Alberto Grassi, Riccardo Compagnoni, Paolo Ferrua, Stefano Pasqualotto, Carlo Zaolino, Stefano Zaffagnini, Pietro Randelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Patellar eversion during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a debated issue. The aim of this study is to perform a review of overlapping meta-analyses analyzing clinical outcomes of patellar eversion compared to noneversion. A search was performed in PubMed\MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs;l comparison between TKAs with or without patellar eversion; and at least one outcome, such as reoperation rate, pain, and functional scores. Meta-analyses were evaluated with the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR) score, addressing the most relevant one with the Jadad algorithm. Three meta-analyses were identified and included in this review. No significant differences were found regarding complications, quadriceps strength, functional, and radiological outcomes. The meta-analysis by Zan et al. was selected as the best available one. Patellar eversion group showed a shorter tourniquet time but a longer skin incision. In conclusion, eversion and noneversion techniques did not demonstrate any significant or clinically relevant difference. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 20 2019

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Patella
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Tourniquets
Reoperation
PubMed
MEDLINE
Libraries
Pain
Skin

Keywords

  • TKA
  • arthroplasty
  • eversion
  • knee
  • meta-analysis
  • patella
  • prosthesis

Cite this

Should the patella be everted during primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. / Grassi, Alberto; Compagnoni, Riccardo; Ferrua, Paolo; Pasqualotto, Stefano; Zaolino, Carlo; Zaffagnini, Stefano; Randelli, Pietro.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol. 27, No. 1, 20.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grassi, Alberto ; Compagnoni, Riccardo ; Ferrua, Paolo ; Pasqualotto, Stefano ; Zaolino, Carlo ; Zaffagnini, Stefano ; Randelli, Pietro. / Should the patella be everted during primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 27, No. 1.
@article{87465f47554241d6bd113c6c619c64f8,
title = "Should the patella be everted during primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses",
abstract = "Patellar eversion during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a debated issue. The aim of this study is to perform a review of overlapping meta-analyses analyzing clinical outcomes of patellar eversion compared to noneversion. A search was performed in PubMed\MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs;l comparison between TKAs with or without patellar eversion; and at least one outcome, such as reoperation rate, pain, and functional scores. Meta-analyses were evaluated with the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR) score, addressing the most relevant one with the Jadad algorithm. Three meta-analyses were identified and included in this review. No significant differences were found regarding complications, quadriceps strength, functional, and radiological outcomes. The meta-analysis by Zan et al. was selected as the best available one. Patellar eversion group showed a shorter tourniquet time but a longer skin incision. In conclusion, eversion and noneversion techniques did not demonstrate any significant or clinically relevant difference. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.",
keywords = "TKA, arthroplasty, eversion, knee, meta-analysis, patella, prosthesis",
author = "Alberto Grassi and Riccardo Compagnoni and Paolo Ferrua and Stefano Pasqualotto and Carlo Zaolino and Stefano Zaffagnini and Pietro Randelli",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1177/2309499019828550",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery",
issn = "1022-5536",
publisher = "Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should the patella be everted during primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

AU - Grassi, Alberto

AU - Compagnoni, Riccardo

AU - Ferrua, Paolo

AU - Pasqualotto, Stefano

AU - Zaolino, Carlo

AU - Zaffagnini, Stefano

AU - Randelli, Pietro

PY - 2019/2/20

Y1 - 2019/2/20

N2 - Patellar eversion during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a debated issue. The aim of this study is to perform a review of overlapping meta-analyses analyzing clinical outcomes of patellar eversion compared to noneversion. A search was performed in PubMed\MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs;l comparison between TKAs with or without patellar eversion; and at least one outcome, such as reoperation rate, pain, and functional scores. Meta-analyses were evaluated with the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR) score, addressing the most relevant one with the Jadad algorithm. Three meta-analyses were identified and included in this review. No significant differences were found regarding complications, quadriceps strength, functional, and radiological outcomes. The meta-analysis by Zan et al. was selected as the best available one. Patellar eversion group showed a shorter tourniquet time but a longer skin incision. In conclusion, eversion and noneversion techniques did not demonstrate any significant or clinically relevant difference. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.

AB - Patellar eversion during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a debated issue. The aim of this study is to perform a review of overlapping meta-analyses analyzing clinical outcomes of patellar eversion compared to noneversion. A search was performed in PubMed\MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs;l comparison between TKAs with or without patellar eversion; and at least one outcome, such as reoperation rate, pain, and functional scores. Meta-analyses were evaluated with the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review (AMSTAR) score, addressing the most relevant one with the Jadad algorithm. Three meta-analyses were identified and included in this review. No significant differences were found regarding complications, quadriceps strength, functional, and radiological outcomes. The meta-analysis by Zan et al. was selected as the best available one. Patellar eversion group showed a shorter tourniquet time but a longer skin incision. In conclusion, eversion and noneversion techniques did not demonstrate any significant or clinically relevant difference. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.

KW - TKA

KW - arthroplasty

KW - eversion

KW - knee

KW - meta-analysis

KW - patella

KW - prosthesis

U2 - 10.1177/2309499019828550

DO - 10.1177/2309499019828550

M3 - Article

C2 - 30776958

VL - 27

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

SN - 1022-5536

IS - 1

ER -