SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference

Maria Grazia Benedetti, E. Beghi, Antonio De Tanti, Aurelio Cappozzo, N. Basaglia, A. G. Cutti, Andrea Cereatti, R. Stagni, Federica Verdini, M. Manca, Silvia Fantozzi, C Mazzà, V. Camomilla, I. Campanini, A. Castagna, Lorenzo Cavazzuti, Martina Del Maestro, U. Della Croce, M Gasperi, T. LeoPia Marchi, Maurizio Petrarca, Luigi Piccinini, Marco Rabuffetti, Andrea Ravaschio, Zimi Sawacha, Fabiola Spolaor, Luigi Tesio, Giuseppe Vannozzi, Isabella Visintin, Maurizio Ferrarin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts' opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-260
Number of pages9
JournalGait and Posture
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Gait
General Practice
Consensus
Hope
Expert Testimony
Research
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Rehabilitation
Medicine
Guidelines
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Amputee
  • Brain injuries
  • Cerebral pulsy
  • Clinics
  • Consensus conference
  • EMG
  • Force plate
  • Gait analysis
  • Human movement
  • Kinematics
  • Stereophotogrammetry

Cite this

SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference. / Benedetti, Maria Grazia; Beghi, E.; De Tanti, Antonio; Cappozzo, Aurelio; Basaglia, N.; Cutti, A. G.; Cereatti, Andrea; Stagni, R.; Verdini, Federica; Manca, M.; Fantozzi, Silvia; Mazzà, C; Camomilla, V.; Campanini, I.; Castagna, A.; Cavazzuti, Lorenzo; Del Maestro, Martina; Della Croce, U.; Gasperi, M; Leo, T.; Marchi, Pia; Petrarca, Maurizio; Piccinini, Luigi; Rabuffetti, Marco; Ravaschio, Andrea; Sawacha, Zimi; Spolaor, Fabiola; Tesio, Luigi; Vannozzi, Giuseppe; Visintin, Isabella; Ferrarin, Maurizio.

In: Gait and Posture, 08.2017, p. 252-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benedetti, MG, Beghi, E, De Tanti, A, Cappozzo, A, Basaglia, N, Cutti, AG, Cereatti, A, Stagni, R, Verdini, F, Manca, M, Fantozzi, S, Mazzà, C, Camomilla, V, Campanini, I, Castagna, A, Cavazzuti, L, Del Maestro, M, Della Croce, U, Gasperi, M, Leo, T, Marchi, P, Petrarca, M, Piccinini, L, Rabuffetti, M, Ravaschio, A, Sawacha, Z, Spolaor, F, Tesio, L, Vannozzi, G, Visintin, I & Ferrarin, M 2017, 'SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference', Gait and Posture, pp. 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003
Benedetti, Maria Grazia ; Beghi, E. ; De Tanti, Antonio ; Cappozzo, Aurelio ; Basaglia, N. ; Cutti, A. G. ; Cereatti, Andrea ; Stagni, R. ; Verdini, Federica ; Manca, M. ; Fantozzi, Silvia ; Mazzà, C ; Camomilla, V. ; Campanini, I. ; Castagna, A. ; Cavazzuti, Lorenzo ; Del Maestro, Martina ; Della Croce, U. ; Gasperi, M ; Leo, T. ; Marchi, Pia ; Petrarca, Maurizio ; Piccinini, Luigi ; Rabuffetti, Marco ; Ravaschio, Andrea ; Sawacha, Zimi ; Spolaor, Fabiola ; Tesio, Luigi ; Vannozzi, Giuseppe ; Visintin, Isabella ; Ferrarin, Maurizio. / SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference. In: Gait and Posture. 2017 ; pp. 252-260.
@article{e329a49bb1f44118bb1e822e0dc65d5d,
title = "SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference",
abstract = "Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts' opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.",
keywords = "Amputation, Amputee, Brain injuries, Cerebral pulsy, Clinics, Consensus conference, EMG, Force plate, Gait analysis, Human movement, Kinematics, Stereophotogrammetry",
author = "Benedetti, {Maria Grazia} and E. Beghi and {De Tanti}, Antonio and Aurelio Cappozzo and N. Basaglia and Cutti, {A. G.} and Andrea Cereatti and R. Stagni and Federica Verdini and M. Manca and Silvia Fantozzi and C Mazz{\`a} and V. Camomilla and I. Campanini and A. Castagna and Lorenzo Cavazzuti and {Del Maestro}, Martina and {Della Croce}, U. and M Gasperi and T. Leo and Pia Marchi and Maurizio Petrarca and Luigi Piccinini and Marco Rabuffetti and Andrea Ravaschio and Zimi Sawacha and Fabiola Spolaor and Luigi Tesio and Giuseppe Vannozzi and Isabella Visintin and Maurizio Ferrarin",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003",
language = "English",
pages = "252--260",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference

AU - Benedetti, Maria Grazia

AU - Beghi, E.

AU - De Tanti, Antonio

AU - Cappozzo, Aurelio

AU - Basaglia, N.

AU - Cutti, A. G.

AU - Cereatti, Andrea

AU - Stagni, R.

AU - Verdini, Federica

AU - Manca, M.

AU - Fantozzi, Silvia

AU - Mazzà, C

AU - Camomilla, V.

AU - Campanini, I.

AU - Castagna, A.

AU - Cavazzuti, Lorenzo

AU - Del Maestro, Martina

AU - Della Croce, U.

AU - Gasperi, M

AU - Leo, T.

AU - Marchi, Pia

AU - Petrarca, Maurizio

AU - Piccinini, Luigi

AU - Rabuffetti, Marco

AU - Ravaschio, Andrea

AU - Sawacha, Zimi

AU - Spolaor, Fabiola

AU - Tesio, Luigi

AU - Vannozzi, Giuseppe

AU - Visintin, Isabella

AU - Ferrarin, Maurizio

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts' opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.

AB - Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts' opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.

KW - Amputation

KW - Amputee

KW - Brain injuries

KW - Cerebral pulsy

KW - Clinics

KW - Consensus conference

KW - EMG

KW - Force plate

KW - Gait analysis

KW - Human movement

KW - Kinematics

KW - Stereophotogrammetry

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003

M3 - Article

SP - 252

EP - 260

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -