SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution: Pilot study of 21 cases

G. Ruffo, G. Barugola, F. Scopelliti, A. Sartori, S. Crippa, S. Partelli, M. Falconi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Many surgeons have attempted to reduce the number and the size of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to decrease parietal trauma and pain, and to improve cosmetic results. We report a series of laparoscopic cholecystectomies using a single-port technique (SILS) through an umbilical incision in a pilot group of 21 cases. Our goal was to validate and develop the single-port access as a viable option. All the operations were performed using an umbilical SILS port (Ethicon). Most reported techniques utilize special purpose-made instruments. This article provides a stepwise description of the procedure using all straight instruments. No special reticulating instruments or flexible telescopes were used. We report our early difficulties and concerns about the procedure and propose solutions to the problems. Patients' request for improved cosmesis impels surgeons toward the application of SILS, but the true advantage of the technique should be assessed by more evidences. For this reason, we are planning a single-institution, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative pain, operating time and cosmetic result between one port and standard laparoscopic surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-148
Number of pages4
JournalUpdates in Surgery
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Umbilicus
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Cosmetics
Telescopes
Postoperative Pain
Laparoscopy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Monoport
  • SILS
  • Surgical technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution : Pilot study of 21 cases. / Ruffo, G.; Barugola, G.; Scopelliti, F.; Sartori, A.; Crippa, S.; Partelli, S.; Falconi, M.

In: Updates in Surgery, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2012, p. 145-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruffo, G, Barugola, G, Scopelliti, F, Sartori, A, Crippa, S, Partelli, S & Falconi, M 2012, 'SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution: Pilot study of 21 cases', Updates in Surgery, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0151-6
Ruffo G, Barugola G, Scopelliti F, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S et al. SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution: Pilot study of 21 cases. Updates in Surgery. 2012;64(2):145-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0151-6
Ruffo, G. ; Barugola, G. ; Scopelliti, F. ; Sartori, A. ; Crippa, S. ; Partelli, S. ; Falconi, M. / SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution : Pilot study of 21 cases. In: Updates in Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 64, No. 2. pp. 145-148.
@article{b624baab28de485d97e1feabfecfccb5,
title = "SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution: Pilot study of 21 cases",
abstract = "Many surgeons have attempted to reduce the number and the size of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to decrease parietal trauma and pain, and to improve cosmetic results. We report a series of laparoscopic cholecystectomies using a single-port technique (SILS) through an umbilical incision in a pilot group of 21 cases. Our goal was to validate and develop the single-port access as a viable option. All the operations were performed using an umbilical SILS port (Ethicon). Most reported techniques utilize special purpose-made instruments. This article provides a stepwise description of the procedure using all straight instruments. No special reticulating instruments or flexible telescopes were used. We report our early difficulties and concerns about the procedure and propose solutions to the problems. Patients' request for improved cosmesis impels surgeons toward the application of SILS, but the true advantage of the technique should be assessed by more evidences. For this reason, we are planning a single-institution, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative pain, operating time and cosmetic result between one port and standard laparoscopic surgery.",
keywords = "Cholecystectomy, Monoport, SILS, Surgical technique",
author = "G. Ruffo and G. Barugola and F. Scopelliti and A. Sartori and S. Crippa and S. Partelli and M. Falconi",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s13304-012-0151-6",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "145--148",
journal = "Updates in Surgery",
issn = "2038-131X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SILS cholecystectomy, early experience of a single institution

T2 - Pilot study of 21 cases

AU - Ruffo, G.

AU - Barugola, G.

AU - Scopelliti, F.

AU - Sartori, A.

AU - Crippa, S.

AU - Partelli, S.

AU - Falconi, M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Many surgeons have attempted to reduce the number and the size of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to decrease parietal trauma and pain, and to improve cosmetic results. We report a series of laparoscopic cholecystectomies using a single-port technique (SILS) through an umbilical incision in a pilot group of 21 cases. Our goal was to validate and develop the single-port access as a viable option. All the operations were performed using an umbilical SILS port (Ethicon). Most reported techniques utilize special purpose-made instruments. This article provides a stepwise description of the procedure using all straight instruments. No special reticulating instruments or flexible telescopes were used. We report our early difficulties and concerns about the procedure and propose solutions to the problems. Patients' request for improved cosmesis impels surgeons toward the application of SILS, but the true advantage of the technique should be assessed by more evidences. For this reason, we are planning a single-institution, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative pain, operating time and cosmetic result between one port and standard laparoscopic surgery.

AB - Many surgeons have attempted to reduce the number and the size of ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to decrease parietal trauma and pain, and to improve cosmetic results. We report a series of laparoscopic cholecystectomies using a single-port technique (SILS) through an umbilical incision in a pilot group of 21 cases. Our goal was to validate and develop the single-port access as a viable option. All the operations were performed using an umbilical SILS port (Ethicon). Most reported techniques utilize special purpose-made instruments. This article provides a stepwise description of the procedure using all straight instruments. No special reticulating instruments or flexible telescopes were used. We report our early difficulties and concerns about the procedure and propose solutions to the problems. Patients' request for improved cosmesis impels surgeons toward the application of SILS, but the true advantage of the technique should be assessed by more evidences. For this reason, we are planning a single-institution, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative pain, operating time and cosmetic result between one port and standard laparoscopic surgery.

KW - Cholecystectomy

KW - Monoport

KW - SILS

KW - Surgical technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862740530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862740530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13304-012-0151-6

DO - 10.1007/s13304-012-0151-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 22539094

AN - SCOPUS:84862740530

VL - 64

SP - 145

EP - 148

JO - Updates in Surgery

JF - Updates in Surgery

SN - 2038-131X

IS - 2

ER -