Simultaneous paired analysis of numerical chromosomal aberrations and DNA content in osteosarcoma

M. Serra, M. Tarkkanen, N. Baldini, K. Scotlandi, M. Sarti, D. Maurici, M. C. Manara, S. Benini, P. Bacchini, S. Knuutila, P. Picci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the biologic relevance of numerical chromosomal changes in relation to DNA content in osteosarcoma. In this study, by using a series of human osteosarcoma cell lines, we standardized a method for the assessment, on the same nuclei specimen, of both specific chromosome copy numbers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the DNA content by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry. On the same cell lines, we also evaluated the DNA content by using flow cytometry and the chromosome number distribution by metaphase analysis. Comparison between these different methods showed that DNA ploidy level as determined by FISH or metaphase analysis is frequently lower than the ploidy pattern as defined by cytometric methods. By using comparative genomic hybridization, we were able to demonstrate that these discrepancies were due to the presence of several unbalanced chromosome aberrations, specifically gains and high-level amplifications, which affect the total DNA content with less effect on the total chromosome number. Thus, evaluation of DNA ploidy in osteosarcoma cells is needed for a correct interpretation of FISH or cytogenetic data concerning numerical chromosomal changes. Evaluation of tumor ploidy in a series of clinical samples demonstrated that in high-grade osteosarcoma, flow cytometry sometimes may give false results because of the presence of high proportions of contaminating, nonneoplastic cells that cannot be excluded from the flow cytometric assessment but that do not interfere with the evaluation of DNA ploidy by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry, in which only rumor cells are selected for the analysis. The possibility of using this method to evaluate, on the same nuclei sample, both specific chromosomal aberrations and DNA ploidy may allow a better determination of numerical chromosomal changes that may be relevant for the biologic behavior of osteosarcoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)710-716
Number of pages7
JournalModern Pathology
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Osteosarcoma
Chromosome Aberrations
Ploidies
DNA
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Image Cytometry
Chromosomes
Metaphase
Flow Cytometry
Cell Line
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
Cytogenetics

Keywords

  • CGH
  • Cytometry
  • FISH
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Ploidy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Simultaneous paired analysis of numerical chromosomal aberrations and DNA content in osteosarcoma. / Serra, M.; Tarkkanen, M.; Baldini, N.; Scotlandi, K.; Sarti, M.; Maurici, D.; Manara, M. C.; Benini, S.; Bacchini, P.; Knuutila, S.; Picci, P.

In: Modern Pathology, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2001, p. 710-716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Serra, M. ; Tarkkanen, M. ; Baldini, N. ; Scotlandi, K. ; Sarti, M. ; Maurici, D. ; Manara, M. C. ; Benini, S. ; Bacchini, P. ; Knuutila, S. ; Picci, P. / Simultaneous paired analysis of numerical chromosomal aberrations and DNA content in osteosarcoma. In: Modern Pathology. 2001 ; Vol. 14, No. 7. pp. 710-716.
@article{30447fa78f58449ab03cb4da656357ed,
title = "Simultaneous paired analysis of numerical chromosomal aberrations and DNA content in osteosarcoma",
abstract = "Relatively little is known about the biologic relevance of numerical chromosomal changes in relation to DNA content in osteosarcoma. In this study, by using a series of human osteosarcoma cell lines, we standardized a method for the assessment, on the same nuclei specimen, of both specific chromosome copy numbers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the DNA content by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry. On the same cell lines, we also evaluated the DNA content by using flow cytometry and the chromosome number distribution by metaphase analysis. Comparison between these different methods showed that DNA ploidy level as determined by FISH or metaphase analysis is frequently lower than the ploidy pattern as defined by cytometric methods. By using comparative genomic hybridization, we were able to demonstrate that these discrepancies were due to the presence of several unbalanced chromosome aberrations, specifically gains and high-level amplifications, which affect the total DNA content with less effect on the total chromosome number. Thus, evaluation of DNA ploidy in osteosarcoma cells is needed for a correct interpretation of FISH or cytogenetic data concerning numerical chromosomal changes. Evaluation of tumor ploidy in a series of clinical samples demonstrated that in high-grade osteosarcoma, flow cytometry sometimes may give false results because of the presence of high proportions of contaminating, nonneoplastic cells that cannot be excluded from the flow cytometric assessment but that do not interfere with the evaluation of DNA ploidy by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry, in which only rumor cells are selected for the analysis. The possibility of using this method to evaluate, on the same nuclei sample, both specific chromosomal aberrations and DNA ploidy may allow a better determination of numerical chromosomal changes that may be relevant for the biologic behavior of osteosarcoma.",
keywords = "CGH, Cytometry, FISH, Osteosarcoma, Ploidy",
author = "M. Serra and M. Tarkkanen and N. Baldini and K. Scotlandi and M. Sarti and D. Maurici and Manara, {M. C.} and S. Benini and P. Bacchini and S. Knuutila and P. Picci",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1038/modpathol.3880377",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "710--716",
journal = "Modern Pathology",
issn = "0893-3952",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simultaneous paired analysis of numerical chromosomal aberrations and DNA content in osteosarcoma

AU - Serra, M.

AU - Tarkkanen, M.

AU - Baldini, N.

AU - Scotlandi, K.

AU - Sarti, M.

AU - Maurici, D.

AU - Manara, M. C.

AU - Benini, S.

AU - Bacchini, P.

AU - Knuutila, S.

AU - Picci, P.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Relatively little is known about the biologic relevance of numerical chromosomal changes in relation to DNA content in osteosarcoma. In this study, by using a series of human osteosarcoma cell lines, we standardized a method for the assessment, on the same nuclei specimen, of both specific chromosome copy numbers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the DNA content by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry. On the same cell lines, we also evaluated the DNA content by using flow cytometry and the chromosome number distribution by metaphase analysis. Comparison between these different methods showed that DNA ploidy level as determined by FISH or metaphase analysis is frequently lower than the ploidy pattern as defined by cytometric methods. By using comparative genomic hybridization, we were able to demonstrate that these discrepancies were due to the presence of several unbalanced chromosome aberrations, specifically gains and high-level amplifications, which affect the total DNA content with less effect on the total chromosome number. Thus, evaluation of DNA ploidy in osteosarcoma cells is needed for a correct interpretation of FISH or cytogenetic data concerning numerical chromosomal changes. Evaluation of tumor ploidy in a series of clinical samples demonstrated that in high-grade osteosarcoma, flow cytometry sometimes may give false results because of the presence of high proportions of contaminating, nonneoplastic cells that cannot be excluded from the flow cytometric assessment but that do not interfere with the evaluation of DNA ploidy by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry, in which only rumor cells are selected for the analysis. The possibility of using this method to evaluate, on the same nuclei sample, both specific chromosomal aberrations and DNA ploidy may allow a better determination of numerical chromosomal changes that may be relevant for the biologic behavior of osteosarcoma.

AB - Relatively little is known about the biologic relevance of numerical chromosomal changes in relation to DNA content in osteosarcoma. In this study, by using a series of human osteosarcoma cell lines, we standardized a method for the assessment, on the same nuclei specimen, of both specific chromosome copy numbers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and the DNA content by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry. On the same cell lines, we also evaluated the DNA content by using flow cytometry and the chromosome number distribution by metaphase analysis. Comparison between these different methods showed that DNA ploidy level as determined by FISH or metaphase analysis is frequently lower than the ploidy pattern as defined by cytometric methods. By using comparative genomic hybridization, we were able to demonstrate that these discrepancies were due to the presence of several unbalanced chromosome aberrations, specifically gains and high-level amplifications, which affect the total DNA content with less effect on the total chromosome number. Thus, evaluation of DNA ploidy in osteosarcoma cells is needed for a correct interpretation of FISH or cytogenetic data concerning numerical chromosomal changes. Evaluation of tumor ploidy in a series of clinical samples demonstrated that in high-grade osteosarcoma, flow cytometry sometimes may give false results because of the presence of high proportions of contaminating, nonneoplastic cells that cannot be excluded from the flow cytometric assessment but that do not interfere with the evaluation of DNA ploidy by static cytofluorometry or image cytometry, in which only rumor cells are selected for the analysis. The possibility of using this method to evaluate, on the same nuclei sample, both specific chromosomal aberrations and DNA ploidy may allow a better determination of numerical chromosomal changes that may be relevant for the biologic behavior of osteosarcoma.

KW - CGH

KW - Cytometry

KW - FISH

KW - Osteosarcoma

KW - Ploidy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844380243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17844380243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/modpathol.3880377

DO - 10.1038/modpathol.3880377

M3 - Article

C2 - 11455004

AN - SCOPUS:17844380243

VL - 14

SP - 710

EP - 716

JO - Modern Pathology

JF - Modern Pathology

SN - 0893-3952

IS - 7

ER -