Single-Incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy

Our single center single surgeon experience

F. Ceci, S. Orsini, A. Tudisco, M. Avallone, F. Aiuti, V. Di Girolamo, F. Stefanelli, F. De Angelis, A. Martellucci, A. Costantino, C. Di Grazia, S. Nicodemi, B. Cipriani, A. Napoleoni, R. Mosillo, S. Corelli, G. Casciaro, E. Spaziani, F. Stagnitti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated the clinical and technical benefits of the laparoscopic surgery for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Our retrospective study included 12 patient who underwent SILS appendectomy (SILS-A), 14 who received conventional laparoscopic surgery (VL-A), and 12 who received laparotomic appendectomy (OA); performed in all cases by the same surgeon (C.F.). The aim of this study was the comparison between this three different surgical techniques on same features: post operative leukocytosis, post operative pain, need abdominal drainage, esthetic viewpoint, incidence of complication, hospital stay. The results showed no significant differences between SILS-A and VLS-A, while an evident improvement shows versus O-A, even though not statistically significative. SILS was more effective in decreasing the risk of postoperative wound infection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-219
Number of pages4
JournalGiornale di Chirurgia
Volume34
Issue number7-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Laparoscopy
Surgical Wound Infection
Leukocytosis
Appendicitis
Esthetics
Abdominal Pain
Drainage
Length of Stay
Retrospective Studies
Incidence
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
  • Open appendectomy
  • Post-Operative complications
  • SILS appendectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Single-Incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy : Our single center single surgeon experience. / Ceci, F.; Orsini, S.; Tudisco, A.; Avallone, M.; Aiuti, F.; Di Girolamo, V.; Stefanelli, F.; De Angelis, F.; Martellucci, A.; Costantino, A.; Di Grazia, C.; Nicodemi, S.; Cipriani, B.; Napoleoni, A.; Mosillo, R.; Corelli, S.; Casciaro, G.; Spaziani, E.; Stagnitti, F.

In: Giornale di Chirurgia, Vol. 34, No. 7-8, 07.2013, p. 216-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ceci, F, Orsini, S, Tudisco, A, Avallone, M, Aiuti, F, Di Girolamo, V, Stefanelli, F, De Angelis, F, Martellucci, A, Costantino, A, Di Grazia, C, Nicodemi, S, Cipriani, B, Napoleoni, A, Mosillo, R, Corelli, S, Casciaro, G, Spaziani, E & Stagnitti, F 2013, 'Single-Incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy: Our single center single surgeon experience', Giornale di Chirurgia, vol. 34, no. 7-8, pp. 216-219. https://doi.org/10.11138/gchir/2013.34.7.216
Ceci, F. ; Orsini, S. ; Tudisco, A. ; Avallone, M. ; Aiuti, F. ; Di Girolamo, V. ; Stefanelli, F. ; De Angelis, F. ; Martellucci, A. ; Costantino, A. ; Di Grazia, C. ; Nicodemi, S. ; Cipriani, B. ; Napoleoni, A. ; Mosillo, R. ; Corelli, S. ; Casciaro, G. ; Spaziani, E. ; Stagnitti, F. / Single-Incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy : Our single center single surgeon experience. In: Giornale di Chirurgia. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 7-8. pp. 216-219.
@article{7007475e08184d8a8318013fce72a276,
title = "Single-Incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy: Our single center single surgeon experience",
abstract = "Several studies have demonstrated the clinical and technical benefits of the laparoscopic surgery for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Our retrospective study included 12 patient who underwent SILS appendectomy (SILS-A), 14 who received conventional laparoscopic surgery (VL-A), and 12 who received laparotomic appendectomy (OA); performed in all cases by the same surgeon (C.F.). The aim of this study was the comparison between this three different surgical techniques on same features: post operative leukocytosis, post operative pain, need abdominal drainage, esthetic viewpoint, incidence of complication, hospital stay. The results showed no significant differences between SILS-A and VLS-A, while an evident improvement shows versus O-A, even though not statistically significative. SILS was more effective in decreasing the risk of postoperative wound infection.",
keywords = "Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, Open appendectomy, Post-Operative complications, SILS appendectomy",
author = "F. Ceci and S. Orsini and A. Tudisco and M. Avallone and F. Aiuti and {Di Girolamo}, V. and F. Stefanelli and {De Angelis}, F. and A. Martellucci and A. Costantino and {Di Grazia}, C. and S. Nicodemi and B. Cipriani and A. Napoleoni and R. Mosillo and S. Corelli and G. Casciaro and E. Spaziani and F. Stagnitti",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.11138/gchir/2013.34.7.216",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "216--219",
journal = "Giornale di Chirurgia",
issn = "0391-9005",
publisher = "CIC Edizioni Internazionali s.r.l.",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-Incision laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic and laparotomic appendectomy

T2 - Our single center single surgeon experience

AU - Ceci, F.

AU - Orsini, S.

AU - Tudisco, A.

AU - Avallone, M.

AU - Aiuti, F.

AU - Di Girolamo, V.

AU - Stefanelli, F.

AU - De Angelis, F.

AU - Martellucci, A.

AU - Costantino, A.

AU - Di Grazia, C.

AU - Nicodemi, S.

AU - Cipriani, B.

AU - Napoleoni, A.

AU - Mosillo, R.

AU - Corelli, S.

AU - Casciaro, G.

AU - Spaziani, E.

AU - Stagnitti, F.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Several studies have demonstrated the clinical and technical benefits of the laparoscopic surgery for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Our retrospective study included 12 patient who underwent SILS appendectomy (SILS-A), 14 who received conventional laparoscopic surgery (VL-A), and 12 who received laparotomic appendectomy (OA); performed in all cases by the same surgeon (C.F.). The aim of this study was the comparison between this three different surgical techniques on same features: post operative leukocytosis, post operative pain, need abdominal drainage, esthetic viewpoint, incidence of complication, hospital stay. The results showed no significant differences between SILS-A and VLS-A, while an evident improvement shows versus O-A, even though not statistically significative. SILS was more effective in decreasing the risk of postoperative wound infection.

AB - Several studies have demonstrated the clinical and technical benefits of the laparoscopic surgery for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Our retrospective study included 12 patient who underwent SILS appendectomy (SILS-A), 14 who received conventional laparoscopic surgery (VL-A), and 12 who received laparotomic appendectomy (OA); performed in all cases by the same surgeon (C.F.). The aim of this study was the comparison between this three different surgical techniques on same features: post operative leukocytosis, post operative pain, need abdominal drainage, esthetic viewpoint, incidence of complication, hospital stay. The results showed no significant differences between SILS-A and VLS-A, while an evident improvement shows versus O-A, even though not statistically significative. SILS was more effective in decreasing the risk of postoperative wound infection.

KW - Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy

KW - Open appendectomy

KW - Post-Operative complications

KW - SILS appendectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891873261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891873261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11138/gchir/2013.34.7.216

DO - 10.11138/gchir/2013.34.7.216

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 216

EP - 219

JO - Giornale di Chirurgia

JF - Giornale di Chirurgia

SN - 0391-9005

IS - 7-8

ER -