Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial

Stefano Partelli; Giuliano Barugola; Alberto Sartori; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Giacomo Ruffo

doi:10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial

Stefano Partelli, Giuliano Barugola, Alberto Sartori, Stefano Crippa, Massimo Falconi, Giacomo Ruffo

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purposes: Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is performed widely; however, single-incision cholecystectomy (SILC) has been proposed as a better and less traumatic procedure. Methods: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, patients were randomized to undergo either elective SILC or TLC. The primary endpoint was the level of pain after surgery and the secondary endpoints were complications, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled (SILC, n = 30; TLC, n = 29). The median operative time was longer for the SILC group (55 vs. 40 min; P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	313-318
Number of pages	6
Journal	Surgery Today
Volume	46
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7
Publication status	Published - Mar 1 2016

Keywords

Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic
Outcomes
Pain
Randomized
Single incision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery

Access to Document

10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7

Cite this

@article{f7dfc666802e4fa4b7d44938eae8ec00,

title = "Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial",

abstract = "Purposes: Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is performed widely; however, single-incision cholecystectomy (SILC) has been proposed as a better and less traumatic procedure. Methods: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, patients were randomized to undergo either elective SILC or TLC. The primary endpoint was the level of pain after surgery and the secondary endpoints were complications, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled (SILC, n = 30; TLC, n = 29). The median operative time was longer for the SILC group (55 vs. 40 min; P ",

keywords = "Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Outcomes, Pain, Randomized, Single incision",

author = "Stefano Partelli and Giuliano Barugola and Alberto Sartori and Stefano Crippa and Massimo Falconi and Giacomo Ruffo",

year = "2016",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "313--318",

journal = "Surgery Today",

issn = "0941-1291",

publisher = "Springer Japan",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon

T2 - findings of a randomized trial

AU - Partelli, Stefano

AU - Barugola, Giuliano

AU - Sartori, Alberto

AU - Crippa, Stefano

AU - Falconi, Massimo

AU - Ruffo, Giacomo

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Purposes: Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is performed widely; however, single-incision cholecystectomy (SILC) has been proposed as a better and less traumatic procedure. Methods: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, patients were randomized to undergo either elective SILC or TLC. The primary endpoint was the level of pain after surgery and the secondary endpoints were complications, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled (SILC, n = 30; TLC, n = 29). The median operative time was longer for the SILC group (55 vs. 40 min; P

AB - Purposes: Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is performed widely; however, single-incision cholecystectomy (SILC) has been proposed as a better and less traumatic procedure. Methods: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, patients were randomized to undergo either elective SILC or TLC. The primary endpoint was the level of pain after surgery and the secondary endpoints were complications, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 59 patients were enrolled (SILC, n = 30; TLC, n = 29). The median operative time was longer for the SILC group (55 vs. 40 min; P

KW - Cholecystectomy

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Outcomes

KW - Pain

KW - Randomized

KW - Single incision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957426942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957426942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7

DO - 10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84957426942

VL - 46

SP - 313

EP - 318

JO - Surgery Today

JF - Surgery Today

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 3

ER -

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this