Single port laparoscopic ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multicentre comparison with multi-port laparoscopy

M. Carvello, E. J. de Groof, A. de Buck van Overstraeten, M. Sacchi, A. M. Wolthuis, C. J. Buskens, A. D'Hoore, W. A. Bemelman, A. Spinelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Single port (SP) ileocaecal resection (ICR) is an established technique but there are no large studies comparing SP and multi-port (MP) laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores and analgesia requirements after SP and MP laparoscopic ICR for CD. Method: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing SP or MP ICR for CD in three tertiary referral centres from February 1999 to October 2014. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, body mass index and indication for surgery) were compared. Primary end-points were postoperative pain scores, analgesia requirements and short-term postoperative outcomes. Results: SP ICR (n = 101) and MP ICR (n = 156) patients were included in the study. Visual analogue scale scores were significantly lower after SP ICR on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.016) and day 2 (P = 0.04). Analgesia requirements were significantly reduced on postoperative day 2 in the SP group compared with the MP group (P = 0.007). Duration of surgery, conversion to open surgery and stoma rates were comparable between the two groups. Surgery was more complex in terms of additional procedures when MP was adopted (P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complication rates, postoperative food intake, length of stay and readmissions. Conclusion: These data suggest that in comparison to standard laparoscopic surgery SP ICR might be less painful and patients might require less opioid analgesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-58
Number of pages6
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Crohn Disease
Laparoscopy
Analgesia
Postoperative Pain
Conversion to Open Surgery
Visual Analog Scale
Tertiary Care Centers
Sex Characteristics
Opioid Analgesics
Length of Stay
Body Mass Index
Retrospective Studies
Eating

Keywords

  • Crohn's disease
  • laparoscopy
  • SILS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Single port laparoscopic ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease : a multicentre comparison with multi-port laparoscopy. / Carvello, M.; de Groof, E. J.; de Buck van Overstraeten, A.; Sacchi, M.; Wolthuis, A. M.; Buskens, C. J.; D'Hoore, A.; Bemelman, W. A.; Spinelli, A.

In: Colorectal Disease, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 53-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carvello, M. ; de Groof, E. J. ; de Buck van Overstraeten, A. ; Sacchi, M. ; Wolthuis, A. M. ; Buskens, C. J. ; D'Hoore, A. ; Bemelman, W. A. ; Spinelli, A. / Single port laparoscopic ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease : a multicentre comparison with multi-port laparoscopy. In: Colorectal Disease. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 53-58.
@article{639121e038bf4bb787b43ebd9b2dc274,
title = "Single port laparoscopic ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multicentre comparison with multi-port laparoscopy",
abstract = "Aim: Single port (SP) ileocaecal resection (ICR) is an established technique but there are no large studies comparing SP and multi-port (MP) laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores and analgesia requirements after SP and MP laparoscopic ICR for CD. Method: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing SP or MP ICR for CD in three tertiary referral centres from February 1999 to October 2014. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, body mass index and indication for surgery) were compared. Primary end-points were postoperative pain scores, analgesia requirements and short-term postoperative outcomes. Results: SP ICR (n = 101) and MP ICR (n = 156) patients were included in the study. Visual analogue scale scores were significantly lower after SP ICR on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.016) and day 2 (P = 0.04). Analgesia requirements were significantly reduced on postoperative day 2 in the SP group compared with the MP group (P = 0.007). Duration of surgery, conversion to open surgery and stoma rates were comparable between the two groups. Surgery was more complex in terms of additional procedures when MP was adopted (P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complication rates, postoperative food intake, length of stay and readmissions. Conclusion: These data suggest that in comparison to standard laparoscopic surgery SP ICR might be less painful and patients might require less opioid analgesia.",
keywords = "Crohn's disease, laparoscopy, SILS",
author = "M. Carvello and {de Groof}, {E. J.} and {de Buck van Overstraeten}, A. and M. Sacchi and Wolthuis, {A. M.} and Buskens, {C. J.} and A. D'Hoore and Bemelman, {W. A.} and A. Spinelli",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/codi.13777",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "53--58",
journal = "Colorectal Disease",
issn = "1462-8910",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single port laparoscopic ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease

T2 - a multicentre comparison with multi-port laparoscopy

AU - Carvello, M.

AU - de Groof, E. J.

AU - de Buck van Overstraeten, A.

AU - Sacchi, M.

AU - Wolthuis, A. M.

AU - Buskens, C. J.

AU - D'Hoore, A.

AU - Bemelman, W. A.

AU - Spinelli, A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Aim: Single port (SP) ileocaecal resection (ICR) is an established technique but there are no large studies comparing SP and multi-port (MP) laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores and analgesia requirements after SP and MP laparoscopic ICR for CD. Method: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing SP or MP ICR for CD in three tertiary referral centres from February 1999 to October 2014. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, body mass index and indication for surgery) were compared. Primary end-points were postoperative pain scores, analgesia requirements and short-term postoperative outcomes. Results: SP ICR (n = 101) and MP ICR (n = 156) patients were included in the study. Visual analogue scale scores were significantly lower after SP ICR on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.016) and day 2 (P = 0.04). Analgesia requirements were significantly reduced on postoperative day 2 in the SP group compared with the MP group (P = 0.007). Duration of surgery, conversion to open surgery and stoma rates were comparable between the two groups. Surgery was more complex in terms of additional procedures when MP was adopted (P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complication rates, postoperative food intake, length of stay and readmissions. Conclusion: These data suggest that in comparison to standard laparoscopic surgery SP ICR might be less painful and patients might require less opioid analgesia.

AB - Aim: Single port (SP) ileocaecal resection (ICR) is an established technique but there are no large studies comparing SP and multi-port (MP) laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores and analgesia requirements after SP and MP laparoscopic ICR for CD. Method: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing SP or MP ICR for CD in three tertiary referral centres from February 1999 to October 2014. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, body mass index and indication for surgery) were compared. Primary end-points were postoperative pain scores, analgesia requirements and short-term postoperative outcomes. Results: SP ICR (n = 101) and MP ICR (n = 156) patients were included in the study. Visual analogue scale scores were significantly lower after SP ICR on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.016) and day 2 (P = 0.04). Analgesia requirements were significantly reduced on postoperative day 2 in the SP group compared with the MP group (P = 0.007). Duration of surgery, conversion to open surgery and stoma rates were comparable between the two groups. Surgery was more complex in terms of additional procedures when MP was adopted (P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complication rates, postoperative food intake, length of stay and readmissions. Conclusion: These data suggest that in comparison to standard laparoscopic surgery SP ICR might be less painful and patients might require less opioid analgesia.

KW - Crohn's disease

KW - laparoscopy

KW - SILS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040133567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040133567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/codi.13777

DO - 10.1111/codi.13777

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040133567

VL - 20

SP - 53

EP - 58

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

SN - 1462-8910

IS - 1

ER -