Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders

Giuseppe D'Antona, Francesca Lanfranconi, Maria Antonietta Pellegrino, Lorenza Brocca, Raffaella Adami, Rosetta Rossi, Giorgio Moro, Danilo Miotti, Monica Canepari, Roberto Bottinelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Needle biopsy samples were taken from vastus lateralis muscle (VL) of five male body builders (BB, age 27.4 ± 0.93 years; mean ± S.E.M.), who had being performing hypertrophic heavy resistance exercise (HHRE) for at least 2 years, and from five male active, but untrained control subjects (CTRL, age 29.9 ± 2.01 years). The following determinations were performed: anatomical cross-sectional area and volumeof the quadriceps andVLmuscles in vivo bymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI);myosin heavy chain isoform(MHC) distribution of the whole biopsy samples by SDS-PAGE; cross-sectional area (CSA), force (Po), specific force (Po/CSA) and maximum shortening velocity (Vo) of a large population (n = 524) of single skinned muscle fibres classified on the basis of MHC isoform composition by SDS-PAGE; actin sliding velocity (Vf) onpuremyosin isoforms by in vitro motility assays. In BB a preferential hypertrophy of fast and especially type 2X fibres was observed. The very large hypertrophy of VL in vivo could not be fully accounted for by single muscle fibre hypertrophy. CSA of VL in vivo was, in fact, 54% larger in BB than in CTRL, whereas mean fibre area was only 14% larger in BB than in CTRL. MHC isoform distribution was shifted towards 2X fibres in BB. Po/CSA was significantly lower in type 1 fibres from BB than in type 1 fibres from CTRL whereas both type 2A and type 2X fibres were significantly stronger in BB than in CTRL. Vo of type 1 fibres and Vf of myosin 1 were significantly lower in BB than in CTRL, whereas no difference was observed among fast fibres and myosin 2A. The findings indicate that skeletal muscle of BB was markedly adapted to HHREthrough extreme hypertrophy, a shift towards the stronger and more powerful fibre types and an increase in specific force of muscle fibres. Such adaptations could not be fully accounted for bywell known mechanisms ofmuscle plasticity, i.e. by the hypertrophy of singlemuscle fibre quantitative mechanism) and by a regulation of contractile properties of muscle fibres based on MHC isoform content (qualitative mechanism). Two BB subjects took anabolic steroids and three BB subjects did not. The former BB differed from the latter BB mostly for the size of their muscles and muscle fibres.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-627
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Physiology
Volume570
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Skeletal Muscle Fibers
Hypertrophy
Skeletal Muscle
Protein Isoforms
Muscles
Myosin Heavy Chains
Quadriceps Muscle
Myosins
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
Testosterone Congeners
Needle Biopsy
Actins
Biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders. / D'Antona, Giuseppe; Lanfranconi, Francesca; Pellegrino, Maria Antonietta; Brocca, Lorenza; Adami, Raffaella; Rossi, Rosetta; Moro, Giorgio; Miotti, Danilo; Canepari, Monica; Bottinelli, Roberto.

In: Journal of Physiology, Vol. 570, No. 3, 02.2006, p. 611-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

D'Antona, G, Lanfranconi, F, Pellegrino, MA, Brocca, L, Adami, R, Rossi, R, Moro, G, Miotti, D, Canepari, M & Bottinelli, R 2006, 'Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders', Journal of Physiology, vol. 570, no. 3, pp. 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101642
D'Antona, Giuseppe ; Lanfranconi, Francesca ; Pellegrino, Maria Antonietta ; Brocca, Lorenza ; Adami, Raffaella ; Rossi, Rosetta ; Moro, Giorgio ; Miotti, Danilo ; Canepari, Monica ; Bottinelli, Roberto. / Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders. In: Journal of Physiology. 2006 ; Vol. 570, No. 3. pp. 611-627.
@article{3a06f8ef9cb2435ebc3001714f75ef22,
title = "Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders",
abstract = "Needle biopsy samples were taken from vastus lateralis muscle (VL) of five male body builders (BB, age 27.4 ± 0.93 years; mean ± S.E.M.), who had being performing hypertrophic heavy resistance exercise (HHRE) for at least 2 years, and from five male active, but untrained control subjects (CTRL, age 29.9 ± 2.01 years). The following determinations were performed: anatomical cross-sectional area and volumeof the quadriceps andVLmuscles in vivo bymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI);myosin heavy chain isoform(MHC) distribution of the whole biopsy samples by SDS-PAGE; cross-sectional area (CSA), force (Po), specific force (Po/CSA) and maximum shortening velocity (Vo) of a large population (n = 524) of single skinned muscle fibres classified on the basis of MHC isoform composition by SDS-PAGE; actin sliding velocity (Vf) onpuremyosin isoforms by in vitro motility assays. In BB a preferential hypertrophy of fast and especially type 2X fibres was observed. The very large hypertrophy of VL in vivo could not be fully accounted for by single muscle fibre hypertrophy. CSA of VL in vivo was, in fact, 54{\%} larger in BB than in CTRL, whereas mean fibre area was only 14{\%} larger in BB than in CTRL. MHC isoform distribution was shifted towards 2X fibres in BB. Po/CSA was significantly lower in type 1 fibres from BB than in type 1 fibres from CTRL whereas both type 2A and type 2X fibres were significantly stronger in BB than in CTRL. Vo of type 1 fibres and Vf of myosin 1 were significantly lower in BB than in CTRL, whereas no difference was observed among fast fibres and myosin 2A. The findings indicate that skeletal muscle of BB was markedly adapted to HHREthrough extreme hypertrophy, a shift towards the stronger and more powerful fibre types and an increase in specific force of muscle fibres. Such adaptations could not be fully accounted for bywell known mechanisms ofmuscle plasticity, i.e. by the hypertrophy of singlemuscle fibre quantitative mechanism) and by a regulation of contractile properties of muscle fibres based on MHC isoform content (qualitative mechanism). Two BB subjects took anabolic steroids and three BB subjects did not. The former BB differed from the latter BB mostly for the size of their muscles and muscle fibres.",
author = "Giuseppe D'Antona and Francesca Lanfranconi and Pellegrino, {Maria Antonietta} and Lorenza Brocca and Raffaella Adami and Rosetta Rossi and Giorgio Moro and Danilo Miotti and Monica Canepari and Roberto Bottinelli",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101642",
language = "English",
volume = "570",
pages = "611--627",
journal = "Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0022-3751",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders

AU - D'Antona, Giuseppe

AU - Lanfranconi, Francesca

AU - Pellegrino, Maria Antonietta

AU - Brocca, Lorenza

AU - Adami, Raffaella

AU - Rossi, Rosetta

AU - Moro, Giorgio

AU - Miotti, Danilo

AU - Canepari, Monica

AU - Bottinelli, Roberto

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Needle biopsy samples were taken from vastus lateralis muscle (VL) of five male body builders (BB, age 27.4 ± 0.93 years; mean ± S.E.M.), who had being performing hypertrophic heavy resistance exercise (HHRE) for at least 2 years, and from five male active, but untrained control subjects (CTRL, age 29.9 ± 2.01 years). The following determinations were performed: anatomical cross-sectional area and volumeof the quadriceps andVLmuscles in vivo bymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI);myosin heavy chain isoform(MHC) distribution of the whole biopsy samples by SDS-PAGE; cross-sectional area (CSA), force (Po), specific force (Po/CSA) and maximum shortening velocity (Vo) of a large population (n = 524) of single skinned muscle fibres classified on the basis of MHC isoform composition by SDS-PAGE; actin sliding velocity (Vf) onpuremyosin isoforms by in vitro motility assays. In BB a preferential hypertrophy of fast and especially type 2X fibres was observed. The very large hypertrophy of VL in vivo could not be fully accounted for by single muscle fibre hypertrophy. CSA of VL in vivo was, in fact, 54% larger in BB than in CTRL, whereas mean fibre area was only 14% larger in BB than in CTRL. MHC isoform distribution was shifted towards 2X fibres in BB. Po/CSA was significantly lower in type 1 fibres from BB than in type 1 fibres from CTRL whereas both type 2A and type 2X fibres were significantly stronger in BB than in CTRL. Vo of type 1 fibres and Vf of myosin 1 were significantly lower in BB than in CTRL, whereas no difference was observed among fast fibres and myosin 2A. The findings indicate that skeletal muscle of BB was markedly adapted to HHREthrough extreme hypertrophy, a shift towards the stronger and more powerful fibre types and an increase in specific force of muscle fibres. Such adaptations could not be fully accounted for bywell known mechanisms ofmuscle plasticity, i.e. by the hypertrophy of singlemuscle fibre quantitative mechanism) and by a regulation of contractile properties of muscle fibres based on MHC isoform content (qualitative mechanism). Two BB subjects took anabolic steroids and three BB subjects did not. The former BB differed from the latter BB mostly for the size of their muscles and muscle fibres.

AB - Needle biopsy samples were taken from vastus lateralis muscle (VL) of five male body builders (BB, age 27.4 ± 0.93 years; mean ± S.E.M.), who had being performing hypertrophic heavy resistance exercise (HHRE) for at least 2 years, and from five male active, but untrained control subjects (CTRL, age 29.9 ± 2.01 years). The following determinations were performed: anatomical cross-sectional area and volumeof the quadriceps andVLmuscles in vivo bymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI);myosin heavy chain isoform(MHC) distribution of the whole biopsy samples by SDS-PAGE; cross-sectional area (CSA), force (Po), specific force (Po/CSA) and maximum shortening velocity (Vo) of a large population (n = 524) of single skinned muscle fibres classified on the basis of MHC isoform composition by SDS-PAGE; actin sliding velocity (Vf) onpuremyosin isoforms by in vitro motility assays. In BB a preferential hypertrophy of fast and especially type 2X fibres was observed. The very large hypertrophy of VL in vivo could not be fully accounted for by single muscle fibre hypertrophy. CSA of VL in vivo was, in fact, 54% larger in BB than in CTRL, whereas mean fibre area was only 14% larger in BB than in CTRL. MHC isoform distribution was shifted towards 2X fibres in BB. Po/CSA was significantly lower in type 1 fibres from BB than in type 1 fibres from CTRL whereas both type 2A and type 2X fibres were significantly stronger in BB than in CTRL. Vo of type 1 fibres and Vf of myosin 1 were significantly lower in BB than in CTRL, whereas no difference was observed among fast fibres and myosin 2A. The findings indicate that skeletal muscle of BB was markedly adapted to HHREthrough extreme hypertrophy, a shift towards the stronger and more powerful fibre types and an increase in specific force of muscle fibres. Such adaptations could not be fully accounted for bywell known mechanisms ofmuscle plasticity, i.e. by the hypertrophy of singlemuscle fibre quantitative mechanism) and by a regulation of contractile properties of muscle fibres based on MHC isoform content (qualitative mechanism). Two BB subjects took anabolic steroids and three BB subjects did not. The former BB differed from the latter BB mostly for the size of their muscles and muscle fibres.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645876167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645876167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101642

DO - 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101642

M3 - Article

VL - 570

SP - 611

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Physiology

JF - Journal of Physiology

SN - 0022-3751

IS - 3

ER -