Sleep disturbances and quality of life in postoperative management after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Marco Scarpa, Eleonora Pinto, Luca M. Saadeh, Matteo Parotto, Anna Da Roit, Elisa Pizzolato, Rita Alfieri, Matteo Cagol, Elisabetta Saraceni, Fabio Baratto, Carlo Castoro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aims of this prospective study were to analyze the predictors of postoperative sleep disturbance after esophagectomy for cancer and to identify patients at risk for postoperative hypnotic administration. Methods: Sixty two consecutive patients who underwent cancer-related esophagectomy were enrolled in this study from May 2011 to February 2012. Data about perioperative management, postoperative complications, ICU stay, and vasopressor, hypnotic, and painkiller administration were retrieved. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used and global quality of life (QL2 item) and sleep disturbance (SL item) were the primary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Postoperative request of hypnotics independently predicted bad quality of life outcome. Sleep disturbance after esophagectomy was independently predicted by the duration of dopamine infusion in the ICU and the daily request of benzodiazepines. Even in this case, only sleep disturbance at diagnosis revealed to be an independent predictor of hypnotic administration need. ROC curve analysis showed that sleep disturbance at diagnosis was a good predictor of benzodiazepine request (AUC = 73%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The use of vasopressors in the ICU affects sleep in the following postoperative period and the use of hypnotics is neither completely successful nor lacking in possible consequences. Sleep disturbance at diagnosis can successfully predict patients who can develop sleep disturbance during the postoperative period.

Original languageEnglish
Article number156
JournalWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 21 2014

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Esophageal Neoplasms
Sleep
Quality of Life
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Benzodiazepines
Postoperative Period
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Dopamine
Neoplasms
Multivariate Analysis
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Esophageal cancer
  • Esophagectomy
  • Postoperative management
  • Sleep disturbance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sleep disturbances and quality of life in postoperative management after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. / Scarpa, Marco; Pinto, Eleonora; Saadeh, Luca M.; Parotto, Matteo; Da Roit, Anna; Pizzolato, Elisa; Alfieri, Rita; Cagol, Matteo; Saraceni, Elisabetta; Baratto, Fabio; Castoro, Carlo.

In: World Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 156, 21.05.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{285b32371a4a4eb8864090f7902fb802,
title = "Sleep disturbances and quality of life in postoperative management after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer",
abstract = "Background: The aims of this prospective study were to analyze the predictors of postoperative sleep disturbance after esophagectomy for cancer and to identify patients at risk for postoperative hypnotic administration. Methods: Sixty two consecutive patients who underwent cancer-related esophagectomy were enrolled in this study from May 2011 to February 2012. Data about perioperative management, postoperative complications, ICU stay, and vasopressor, hypnotic, and painkiller administration were retrieved. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used and global quality of life (QL2 item) and sleep disturbance (SL item) were the primary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Postoperative request of hypnotics independently predicted bad quality of life outcome. Sleep disturbance after esophagectomy was independently predicted by the duration of dopamine infusion in the ICU and the daily request of benzodiazepines. Even in this case, only sleep disturbance at diagnosis revealed to be an independent predictor of hypnotic administration need. ROC curve analysis showed that sleep disturbance at diagnosis was a good predictor of benzodiazepine request (AUC = 73{\%}, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The use of vasopressors in the ICU affects sleep in the following postoperative period and the use of hypnotics is neither completely successful nor lacking in possible consequences. Sleep disturbance at diagnosis can successfully predict patients who can develop sleep disturbance during the postoperative period.",
keywords = "Esophageal cancer, Esophagectomy, Postoperative management, Sleep disturbance",
author = "Marco Scarpa and Eleonora Pinto and Saadeh, {Luca M.} and Matteo Parotto and {Da Roit}, Anna and Elisa Pizzolato and Rita Alfieri and Matteo Cagol and Elisabetta Saraceni and Fabio Baratto and Carlo Castoro",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/1477-7819-12-156",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "World Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1477-7819",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sleep disturbances and quality of life in postoperative management after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

AU - Scarpa, Marco

AU - Pinto, Eleonora

AU - Saadeh, Luca M.

AU - Parotto, Matteo

AU - Da Roit, Anna

AU - Pizzolato, Elisa

AU - Alfieri, Rita

AU - Cagol, Matteo

AU - Saraceni, Elisabetta

AU - Baratto, Fabio

AU - Castoro, Carlo

PY - 2014/5/21

Y1 - 2014/5/21

N2 - Background: The aims of this prospective study were to analyze the predictors of postoperative sleep disturbance after esophagectomy for cancer and to identify patients at risk for postoperative hypnotic administration. Methods: Sixty two consecutive patients who underwent cancer-related esophagectomy were enrolled in this study from May 2011 to February 2012. Data about perioperative management, postoperative complications, ICU stay, and vasopressor, hypnotic, and painkiller administration were retrieved. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used and global quality of life (QL2 item) and sleep disturbance (SL item) were the primary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Postoperative request of hypnotics independently predicted bad quality of life outcome. Sleep disturbance after esophagectomy was independently predicted by the duration of dopamine infusion in the ICU and the daily request of benzodiazepines. Even in this case, only sleep disturbance at diagnosis revealed to be an independent predictor of hypnotic administration need. ROC curve analysis showed that sleep disturbance at diagnosis was a good predictor of benzodiazepine request (AUC = 73%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The use of vasopressors in the ICU affects sleep in the following postoperative period and the use of hypnotics is neither completely successful nor lacking in possible consequences. Sleep disturbance at diagnosis can successfully predict patients who can develop sleep disturbance during the postoperative period.

AB - Background: The aims of this prospective study were to analyze the predictors of postoperative sleep disturbance after esophagectomy for cancer and to identify patients at risk for postoperative hypnotic administration. Methods: Sixty two consecutive patients who underwent cancer-related esophagectomy were enrolled in this study from May 2011 to February 2012. Data about perioperative management, postoperative complications, ICU stay, and vasopressor, hypnotic, and painkiller administration were retrieved. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used and global quality of life (QL2 item) and sleep disturbance (SL item) were the primary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Postoperative request of hypnotics independently predicted bad quality of life outcome. Sleep disturbance after esophagectomy was independently predicted by the duration of dopamine infusion in the ICU and the daily request of benzodiazepines. Even in this case, only sleep disturbance at diagnosis revealed to be an independent predictor of hypnotic administration need. ROC curve analysis showed that sleep disturbance at diagnosis was a good predictor of benzodiazepine request (AUC = 73%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The use of vasopressors in the ICU affects sleep in the following postoperative period and the use of hypnotics is neither completely successful nor lacking in possible consequences. Sleep disturbance at diagnosis can successfully predict patients who can develop sleep disturbance during the postoperative period.

KW - Esophageal cancer

KW - Esophagectomy

KW - Postoperative management

KW - Sleep disturbance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901316832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901316832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1477-7819-12-156

DO - 10.1186/1477-7819-12-156

M3 - Article

C2 - 24886219

AN - SCOPUS:84901316832

VL - 12

JO - World Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - World Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1477-7819

IS - 1

M1 - 156

ER -