Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion: Attitudinal versus objective items

Anne Maass, Chiara Volpato, Angelica Mucchi-Faina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments are reported comparing majority and minority influence on attitudinal (opinion) vs. objective (knowledge) tasks. The hypothesis that minority influence would decline on objective items was tested by exposing subjects either to a minority or majority influence source; the question under discussion was either objective ('from which country does Italy import most of its raw oil?') or attitudinal ('from which country should Italy import most of its raw oil?'). Experiment 1 showed that, compared to a no-influence control group, majorities exerted a reliable influence on both objective and attitudinal issues whereas minorities were persuasive only on attitudinal issues. Experiment 2 indicated that this was true only for subjects who were uncertain of their own position, while minorities were unable to convince highly certain subjects regardless of type of task. Implications of these findings for the comparison of conformity and minority influence research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-26
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume35
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1996

Fingerprint

Italy
Oils
Control Groups
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion : Attitudinal versus objective items. / Maass, Anne; Volpato, Chiara; Mucchi-Faina, Angelica.

In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 1, 03.1996, p. 15-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1991f44ad90847d5b845f8ea82d32a0c,
title = "Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion: Attitudinal versus objective items",
abstract = "Two experiments are reported comparing majority and minority influence on attitudinal (opinion) vs. objective (knowledge) tasks. The hypothesis that minority influence would decline on objective items was tested by exposing subjects either to a minority or majority influence source; the question under discussion was either objective ('from which country does Italy import most of its raw oil?') or attitudinal ('from which country should Italy import most of its raw oil?'). Experiment 1 showed that, compared to a no-influence control group, majorities exerted a reliable influence on both objective and attitudinal issues whereas minorities were persuasive only on attitudinal issues. Experiment 2 indicated that this was true only for subjects who were uncertain of their own position, while minorities were unable to convince highly certain subjects regardless of type of task. Implications of these findings for the comparison of conformity and minority influence research are discussed.",
author = "Anne Maass and Chiara Volpato and Angelica Mucchi-Faina",
year = "1996",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "15--26",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social influence and the verifiability of the issue under discussion

T2 - Attitudinal versus objective items

AU - Maass, Anne

AU - Volpato, Chiara

AU - Mucchi-Faina, Angelica

PY - 1996/3

Y1 - 1996/3

N2 - Two experiments are reported comparing majority and minority influence on attitudinal (opinion) vs. objective (knowledge) tasks. The hypothesis that minority influence would decline on objective items was tested by exposing subjects either to a minority or majority influence source; the question under discussion was either objective ('from which country does Italy import most of its raw oil?') or attitudinal ('from which country should Italy import most of its raw oil?'). Experiment 1 showed that, compared to a no-influence control group, majorities exerted a reliable influence on both objective and attitudinal issues whereas minorities were persuasive only on attitudinal issues. Experiment 2 indicated that this was true only for subjects who were uncertain of their own position, while minorities were unable to convince highly certain subjects regardless of type of task. Implications of these findings for the comparison of conformity and minority influence research are discussed.

AB - Two experiments are reported comparing majority and minority influence on attitudinal (opinion) vs. objective (knowledge) tasks. The hypothesis that minority influence would decline on objective items was tested by exposing subjects either to a minority or majority influence source; the question under discussion was either objective ('from which country does Italy import most of its raw oil?') or attitudinal ('from which country should Italy import most of its raw oil?'). Experiment 1 showed that, compared to a no-influence control group, majorities exerted a reliable influence on both objective and attitudinal issues whereas minorities were persuasive only on attitudinal issues. Experiment 2 indicated that this was true only for subjects who were uncertain of their own position, while minorities were unable to convince highly certain subjects regardless of type of task. Implications of these findings for the comparison of conformity and minority influence research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842472021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842472021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1842472021

VL - 35

SP - 15

EP - 26

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

IS - 1

ER -