Sorin stentless pericardial valve versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: Is it worthwhile to struggle?

Fabio Miraldi, Lorenzo Spagnesi, Demetrio Tallarico, Gerardino Di Matteo, Gianluca Brancaccio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared two bovine pericardium prostheses (Sorin Freedom versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount) in patients with small aortic annulus, randomizing 80 patients affected by prevalent aortic stenosis and studying the residual gradient, the effective orifice area, the left ventricular mass regression and the ventricular function to evaluate the cost-benefit in terms of risk-advantages for the patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-255
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume118
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 31 2007

Fingerprint

Bioprosthesis
Ventricular Function
Pericardium
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Prostheses and Implants
Cost-Benefit Analysis

Keywords

  • Aortic valve replacement
  • Left ventricular mass regression
  • Pericardial bioprosthesis
  • Stentless valve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Sorin stentless pericardial valve versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis : Is it worthwhile to struggle? / Miraldi, Fabio; Spagnesi, Lorenzo; Tallarico, Demetrio; Di Matteo, Gerardino; Brancaccio, Gianluca.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 118, No. 2, 31.05.2007, p. 253-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miraldi, Fabio ; Spagnesi, Lorenzo ; Tallarico, Demetrio ; Di Matteo, Gerardino ; Brancaccio, Gianluca. / Sorin stentless pericardial valve versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis : Is it worthwhile to struggle?. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2007 ; Vol. 118, No. 2. pp. 253-255.
@article{79b1aadc4d294f04a8fec44f331c6130,
title = "Sorin stentless pericardial valve versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: Is it worthwhile to struggle?",
abstract = "We compared two bovine pericardium prostheses (Sorin Freedom versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount) in patients with small aortic annulus, randomizing 80 patients affected by prevalent aortic stenosis and studying the residual gradient, the effective orifice area, the left ventricular mass regression and the ventricular function to evaluate the cost-benefit in terms of risk-advantages for the patient.",
keywords = "Aortic valve replacement, Left ventricular mass regression, Pericardial bioprosthesis, Stentless valve",
author = "Fabio Miraldi and Lorenzo Spagnesi and Demetrio Tallarico and {Di Matteo}, Gerardino and Gianluca Brancaccio",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.164",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "253--255",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sorin stentless pericardial valve versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis

T2 - Is it worthwhile to struggle?

AU - Miraldi, Fabio

AU - Spagnesi, Lorenzo

AU - Tallarico, Demetrio

AU - Di Matteo, Gerardino

AU - Brancaccio, Gianluca

PY - 2007/5/31

Y1 - 2007/5/31

N2 - We compared two bovine pericardium prostheses (Sorin Freedom versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount) in patients with small aortic annulus, randomizing 80 patients affected by prevalent aortic stenosis and studying the residual gradient, the effective orifice area, the left ventricular mass regression and the ventricular function to evaluate the cost-benefit in terms of risk-advantages for the patient.

AB - We compared two bovine pericardium prostheses (Sorin Freedom versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount) in patients with small aortic annulus, randomizing 80 patients affected by prevalent aortic stenosis and studying the residual gradient, the effective orifice area, the left ventricular mass regression and the ventricular function to evaluate the cost-benefit in terms of risk-advantages for the patient.

KW - Aortic valve replacement

KW - Left ventricular mass regression

KW - Pericardial bioprosthesis

KW - Stentless valve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247103688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247103688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.164

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.164

M3 - Article

C2 - 17045674

AN - SCOPUS:34247103688

VL - 118

SP - 253

EP - 255

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

IS - 2

ER -