Spatial distribution of positive cores improves the selection of patients with low-risk prostate cancer as candidates for active surveillance

Firas Abdollah, Nazareno Suardi, Umberto Capitanio, Andrea Gallina, Maxine Sun, Luca Villa, Vincenzo Scattoni, Marco Bianchi, Manuela Tutolo, Nicola Fossati, Pierre Karakiewicz, Patrizio Rigatti, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To test the hypothesis that spatial distribution of positive cores at biopsy is a predictor of unfavourable prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy (RP) in active surveillance (AS) candidates. Patients and Methods We examined the data of 524 patients treated with RP, between 2000 and 2012. All fulfilled at least one of four commonly used AS criteria. Regression models tested the relationship between positive cores spatial distribution, defined as the number of positive zones at biopsy (PBxZ) and tumour laterality at biopsy and two endpoints: (i) unfavourable prostate cancer at RP (Gleason score ≥4 + 3, and/or pT3 disease), and (ii) clinically significant prostate cancer (tumour volume ≥2.5 mL). Results Unfavourable prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer rates were 8 and 25%, respectively. Patients with more than one PBxZ had a 3.2-fold higher risk of harbouring unfavourable prostate cancer, and a 2.3-fold higher risk of harbouring clinically significant prostate cancer compared with their counterparts with one PBxZ (both P = 0.01). Patients with bilateral tumour at biopsy had a 3.3-fold higher risk of harbouring unfavourable prostate cancer and a 1.7-fold higher risk of harbouring clinically significant prostate cancer compared with their counterparts with unilateral tumour at biopsy (both P ≤ 0.04). Some of these results did not reach a statistically significant level, when the analyses were restricted to patients that fulfilled the most stringent AS criteria. Conclusions Positive cores spatial distribution at biopsy should be considered, when advising patients about AS. The addition of this predictor to AS inclusion criteria can help identifying patients at a higher risk of progression, and reduce the rate of inappropriate surveillance of aggressive tumours. However, the most stringent AS criteria (namely John-Hopkins criteria and Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance criteria) might not benefit from the addition of this predictor. This point warrants further investigation in future studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBJU International
Volume112
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Keywords

  • active surveillance
  • positive cores
  • prostate biopsy
  • prostate cancer
  • spatial distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial distribution of positive cores improves the selection of patients with low-risk prostate cancer as candidates for active surveillance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this