Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots

Paola Verde, Gregorio Angelino, Francesco Piccolo, Paolo Carrozzo, Alessia Bottiglieri, Laura Lugli, Laura Piccardi, Raff aella Nori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reading a map requires the ability to judge one ' s position in a large-scale space from information presented in a small-scale representation. Individuals are more accurate and faster in making judgments when the " up " direction on the map is the same as the " forward " direction of the environment, which is when a map is aligned with the perspective of the spatial layout they have learned (alignment eff ect). The aim of this study was to explore whether military pilots, who have high spatial abilities, would not show the alignment eff ect compared with nonpilots. METHODS: Recruited were 20 military pilots and 20 nonpilots. Mean fl ight hours were 418.75. Nonpilots without fl ight experience were matched for age and education with pilots. Subjects were asked to learn a map and to perform directional judgments to verify whether the alignment eff ect was present considering absolute angular errors. RESULTS: An ANOVA for mixed designs on absolute angular errors revealed a main " group " eff ect: pilots performed better than nonpilots (pilots: M = 22.60 ± 5.57; nonpilots: M = 82.59 ± 5.56). A main " directional judgments " eff ect was also observed: aligned judgements were easier than contra-aligned judgements (aligned, M = 9.277 ± 0.938; contraaligned, M = 11.004 ± 0.805). ANOVA showed a signifi cant " group 3 directional judgments " interaction: post hoc comparison showed that contra-aligned were more diffi cult than aligned judgments for nonpilots. DISCUSSION: High visuo-spatial abilities preserved pilots from having alignment eff ect bias. They performed directional judgments equally well, being less infl uenced by the increased cognitive eff ort requested by the changing perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)857-862
Number of pages6
JournalAerospace medicine and human performance
Volume89
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Analysis of Variance
Aptitude
Pilots
Spatial Orientation
Reading
Education
Spatial Navigation
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Directional judgements
  • Flight safety
  • Navigational skills
  • Pilots
  • Spatial orientation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Verde, P., Angelino, G., Piccolo, F., Carrozzo, P., Bottiglieri, A., Lugli, L., ... Nori, R. A. (2018). Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots. Aerospace medicine and human performance, 89(10), 857-862. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5023.2018

Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots. / Verde, Paola; Angelino, Gregorio; Piccolo, Francesco; Carrozzo, Paolo; Bottiglieri, Alessia; Lugli, Laura; Piccardi, Laura; Nori, Raff aella.

In: Aerospace medicine and human performance, Vol. 89, No. 10, 01.10.2018, p. 857-862.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verde, P, Angelino, G, Piccolo, F, Carrozzo, P, Bottiglieri, A, Lugli, L, Piccardi, L & Nori, RA 2018, 'Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots', Aerospace medicine and human performance, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 857-862. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5023.2018
Verde P, Angelino G, Piccolo F, Carrozzo P, Bottiglieri A, Lugli L et al. Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots. Aerospace medicine and human performance. 2018 Oct 1;89(10):857-862. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5023.2018
Verde, Paola ; Angelino, Gregorio ; Piccolo, Francesco ; Carrozzo, Paolo ; Bottiglieri, Alessia ; Lugli, Laura ; Piccardi, Laura ; Nori, Raff aella. / Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots. In: Aerospace medicine and human performance. 2018 ; Vol. 89, No. 10. pp. 857-862.
@article{dde087ca5f5b4af9904a96f44b2b8ce8,
title = "Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Reading a map requires the ability to judge one ' s position in a large-scale space from information presented in a small-scale representation. Individuals are more accurate and faster in making judgments when the {"} up {"} direction on the map is the same as the {"} forward {"} direction of the environment, which is when a map is aligned with the perspective of the spatial layout they have learned (alignment eff ect). The aim of this study was to explore whether military pilots, who have high spatial abilities, would not show the alignment eff ect compared with nonpilots. METHODS: Recruited were 20 military pilots and 20 nonpilots. Mean fl ight hours were 418.75. Nonpilots without fl ight experience were matched for age and education with pilots. Subjects were asked to learn a map and to perform directional judgments to verify whether the alignment eff ect was present considering absolute angular errors. RESULTS: An ANOVA for mixed designs on absolute angular errors revealed a main {"} group {"} eff ect: pilots performed better than nonpilots (pilots: M = 22.60 ± 5.57; nonpilots: M = 82.59 ± 5.56). A main {"} directional judgments {"} eff ect was also observed: aligned judgements were easier than contra-aligned judgements (aligned, M = 9.277 ± 0.938; contraaligned, M = 11.004 ± 0.805). ANOVA showed a signifi cant {"} group 3 directional judgments {"} interaction: post hoc comparison showed that contra-aligned were more diffi cult than aligned judgments for nonpilots. DISCUSSION: High visuo-spatial abilities preserved pilots from having alignment eff ect bias. They performed directional judgments equally well, being less infl uenced by the increased cognitive eff ort requested by the changing perspective.",
keywords = "Directional judgements, Flight safety, Navigational skills, Pilots, Spatial orientation",
author = "Paola Verde and Gregorio Angelino and Francesco Piccolo and Paolo Carrozzo and Alessia Bottiglieri and Laura Lugli and Laura Piccardi and Nori, {Raff aella}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3357/AMHP.5023.2018",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "857--862",
journal = "Aerospace medicine and human performance",
issn = "2375-6314",
publisher = "Aerospace Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial orientation and directional judgments in pilots vs. nonpilots

AU - Verde, Paola

AU - Angelino, Gregorio

AU - Piccolo, Francesco

AU - Carrozzo, Paolo

AU - Bottiglieri, Alessia

AU - Lugli, Laura

AU - Piccardi, Laura

AU - Nori, Raff aella

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Reading a map requires the ability to judge one ' s position in a large-scale space from information presented in a small-scale representation. Individuals are more accurate and faster in making judgments when the " up " direction on the map is the same as the " forward " direction of the environment, which is when a map is aligned with the perspective of the spatial layout they have learned (alignment eff ect). The aim of this study was to explore whether military pilots, who have high spatial abilities, would not show the alignment eff ect compared with nonpilots. METHODS: Recruited were 20 military pilots and 20 nonpilots. Mean fl ight hours were 418.75. Nonpilots without fl ight experience were matched for age and education with pilots. Subjects were asked to learn a map and to perform directional judgments to verify whether the alignment eff ect was present considering absolute angular errors. RESULTS: An ANOVA for mixed designs on absolute angular errors revealed a main " group " eff ect: pilots performed better than nonpilots (pilots: M = 22.60 ± 5.57; nonpilots: M = 82.59 ± 5.56). A main " directional judgments " eff ect was also observed: aligned judgements were easier than contra-aligned judgements (aligned, M = 9.277 ± 0.938; contraaligned, M = 11.004 ± 0.805). ANOVA showed a signifi cant " group 3 directional judgments " interaction: post hoc comparison showed that contra-aligned were more diffi cult than aligned judgments for nonpilots. DISCUSSION: High visuo-spatial abilities preserved pilots from having alignment eff ect bias. They performed directional judgments equally well, being less infl uenced by the increased cognitive eff ort requested by the changing perspective.

AB - BACKGROUND: Reading a map requires the ability to judge one ' s position in a large-scale space from information presented in a small-scale representation. Individuals are more accurate and faster in making judgments when the " up " direction on the map is the same as the " forward " direction of the environment, which is when a map is aligned with the perspective of the spatial layout they have learned (alignment eff ect). The aim of this study was to explore whether military pilots, who have high spatial abilities, would not show the alignment eff ect compared with nonpilots. METHODS: Recruited were 20 military pilots and 20 nonpilots. Mean fl ight hours were 418.75. Nonpilots without fl ight experience were matched for age and education with pilots. Subjects were asked to learn a map and to perform directional judgments to verify whether the alignment eff ect was present considering absolute angular errors. RESULTS: An ANOVA for mixed designs on absolute angular errors revealed a main " group " eff ect: pilots performed better than nonpilots (pilots: M = 22.60 ± 5.57; nonpilots: M = 82.59 ± 5.56). A main " directional judgments " eff ect was also observed: aligned judgements were easier than contra-aligned judgements (aligned, M = 9.277 ± 0.938; contraaligned, M = 11.004 ± 0.805). ANOVA showed a signifi cant " group 3 directional judgments " interaction: post hoc comparison showed that contra-aligned were more diffi cult than aligned judgments for nonpilots. DISCUSSION: High visuo-spatial abilities preserved pilots from having alignment eff ect bias. They performed directional judgments equally well, being less infl uenced by the increased cognitive eff ort requested by the changing perspective.

KW - Directional judgements

KW - Flight safety

KW - Navigational skills

KW - Pilots

KW - Spatial orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054793913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054793913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3357/AMHP.5023.2018

DO - 10.3357/AMHP.5023.2018

M3 - Article

C2 - 30219112

AN - SCOPUS:85054793913

VL - 89

SP - 857

EP - 862

JO - Aerospace medicine and human performance

JF - Aerospace medicine and human performance

SN - 2375-6314

IS - 10

ER -