Spinopelvic balance and body image perception in Parkinson’s disease

analysis of correlation

Luciano Bissolotti, Federica Isacco-Grassi, Claudio Orizio, Massimiliano Gobbo, Pedro Berjano, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Stefano Negrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the association between body image perception and sagittal balance (SB) parameters in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients. Methods: 77 consecutive PD patients were included: 44 males, 33 females; 68.9 ± 6.8 years; 5.3 ± 3.8 years from diagnosis (YFD); Hoehn Yahr (HY) 2.0 ± 0.8, Unified Parkinson’s Disease rating Score-Motor section (UPDRS-M) 11.8 ± 9.3. Spinopelvic angles and SB were radiographically assessed. Body image perception was assessed through Trunk appearance scale (TAPS) and Stunkard Figure rating scale for BMI. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to evaluate depressive mood. Results: We detected 32 (41.5 % of cohort) Parkinson Disease patients with scoliosis ≥15° Cobb. The mean calculated BMI was 27.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2. According to the Figure Rating Scale, the perceived BMI averaged 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, while the mean desired BMI was 24.4 ± 2.7 kg/m2, TAPS scored 3.4 ± 0.9 points, while BDI 12.3 ± 7.9 points. TAPS had a weak negative correlation with the duration of disease (r = −0.25, p  0.05). Conclusions: Spinopelvic parameters and depression had a specific and concurrent influence on trunk deformity perception but not on BMI self-esteem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)898-905
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Body Image
Parkinson Disease
Depression
Equipment and Supplies
Scoliosis
Self Concept

Keywords

  • Body image
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Spinopelvic balance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Spinopelvic balance and body image perception in Parkinson’s disease : analysis of correlation. / Bissolotti, Luciano; Isacco-Grassi, Federica; Orizio, Claudio; Gobbo, Massimiliano; Berjano, Pedro; Villafañe, Jorge Hugo; Negrini, Stefano.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 24, 01.11.2015, p. 898-905.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bissolotti, Luciano ; Isacco-Grassi, Federica ; Orizio, Claudio ; Gobbo, Massimiliano ; Berjano, Pedro ; Villafañe, Jorge Hugo ; Negrini, Stefano. / Spinopelvic balance and body image perception in Parkinson’s disease : analysis of correlation. In: European Spine Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 24. pp. 898-905.
@article{fe726581032443ec9567741a6ec57bbc,
title = "Spinopelvic balance and body image perception in Parkinson’s disease: analysis of correlation",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the association between body image perception and sagittal balance (SB) parameters in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients. Methods: 77 consecutive PD patients were included: 44 males, 33 females; 68.9 ± 6.8 years; 5.3 ± 3.8 years from diagnosis (YFD); Hoehn Yahr (HY) 2.0 ± 0.8, Unified Parkinson’s Disease rating Score-Motor section (UPDRS-M) 11.8 ± 9.3. Spinopelvic angles and SB were radiographically assessed. Body image perception was assessed through Trunk appearance scale (TAPS) and Stunkard Figure rating scale for BMI. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to evaluate depressive mood. Results: We detected 32 (41.5 {\%} of cohort) Parkinson Disease patients with scoliosis ≥15° Cobb. The mean calculated BMI was 27.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2. According to the Figure Rating Scale, the perceived BMI averaged 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, while the mean desired BMI was 24.4 ± 2.7 kg/m2, TAPS scored 3.4 ± 0.9 points, while BDI 12.3 ± 7.9 points. TAPS had a weak negative correlation with the duration of disease (r = −0.25, p  0.05). Conclusions: Spinopelvic parameters and depression had a specific and concurrent influence on trunk deformity perception but not on BMI self-esteem.",
keywords = "Body image, Parkinson’s disease, Spinopelvic balance",
author = "Luciano Bissolotti and Federica Isacco-Grassi and Claudio Orizio and Massimiliano Gobbo and Pedro Berjano and Villafa{\~n}e, {Jorge Hugo} and Stefano Negrini",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-015-4265-7",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "898--905",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinopelvic balance and body image perception in Parkinson’s disease

T2 - analysis of correlation

AU - Bissolotti, Luciano

AU - Isacco-Grassi, Federica

AU - Orizio, Claudio

AU - Gobbo, Massimiliano

AU - Berjano, Pedro

AU - Villafañe, Jorge Hugo

AU - Negrini, Stefano

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the association between body image perception and sagittal balance (SB) parameters in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients. Methods: 77 consecutive PD patients were included: 44 males, 33 females; 68.9 ± 6.8 years; 5.3 ± 3.8 years from diagnosis (YFD); Hoehn Yahr (HY) 2.0 ± 0.8, Unified Parkinson’s Disease rating Score-Motor section (UPDRS-M) 11.8 ± 9.3. Spinopelvic angles and SB were radiographically assessed. Body image perception was assessed through Trunk appearance scale (TAPS) and Stunkard Figure rating scale for BMI. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to evaluate depressive mood. Results: We detected 32 (41.5 % of cohort) Parkinson Disease patients with scoliosis ≥15° Cobb. The mean calculated BMI was 27.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2. According to the Figure Rating Scale, the perceived BMI averaged 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, while the mean desired BMI was 24.4 ± 2.7 kg/m2, TAPS scored 3.4 ± 0.9 points, while BDI 12.3 ± 7.9 points. TAPS had a weak negative correlation with the duration of disease (r = −0.25, p  0.05). Conclusions: Spinopelvic parameters and depression had a specific and concurrent influence on trunk deformity perception but not on BMI self-esteem.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the association between body image perception and sagittal balance (SB) parameters in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients. Methods: 77 consecutive PD patients were included: 44 males, 33 females; 68.9 ± 6.8 years; 5.3 ± 3.8 years from diagnosis (YFD); Hoehn Yahr (HY) 2.0 ± 0.8, Unified Parkinson’s Disease rating Score-Motor section (UPDRS-M) 11.8 ± 9.3. Spinopelvic angles and SB were radiographically assessed. Body image perception was assessed through Trunk appearance scale (TAPS) and Stunkard Figure rating scale for BMI. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to evaluate depressive mood. Results: We detected 32 (41.5 % of cohort) Parkinson Disease patients with scoliosis ≥15° Cobb. The mean calculated BMI was 27.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2. According to the Figure Rating Scale, the perceived BMI averaged 27.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2, while the mean desired BMI was 24.4 ± 2.7 kg/m2, TAPS scored 3.4 ± 0.9 points, while BDI 12.3 ± 7.9 points. TAPS had a weak negative correlation with the duration of disease (r = −0.25, p  0.05). Conclusions: Spinopelvic parameters and depression had a specific and concurrent influence on trunk deformity perception but not on BMI self-esteem.

KW - Body image

KW - Parkinson’s disease

KW - Spinopelvic balance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947611368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947611368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-015-4265-7

DO - 10.1007/s00586-015-4265-7

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 898

EP - 905

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

ER -