TY - JOUR
T1 - Splenectomy as part of primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
T2 - A retrospective cohort study
AU - Zapardiel, Ignacio
AU - Peiretti, Michele
AU - Zanagnolo, Vanna
AU - Biffi, Roberto
AU - Bocciolone, Luca
AU - Landoni, Fabio
AU - Aletti, Giovanni
AU - Colombo, Nicoletta
AU - Maggioni, Angelo
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Background: The aim of surgical approach in advanced ovarian cancer should be the complete removal of all visible disease. Our purpose was to compare perioperative features and postoperative complications, and secondarily oncological outcomes, between patients who underwent splenectomy and those who did not at the time of surgery. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three subjects underwent splenectomy, and we selected 99 controls with similar surgical characteristics but who did not undergo splenectomy. Data collected included perioperative details and follow-up data. Results: Longer operating time (33 minutes longer; P = 0.02), larger estimated blood loss (812 mL more; P = 0.03), higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusions (78.8% vs 42.4%; P <0.01), and intensive care unit stay (1.4 vs 0.5 days; P <0.01) aswell as higher pneumonia rate (2% vs 0%; P = 0.01) were observed in the splenectomy group. Disease-free and overall survival rateswere 30.3% and 66.6%, respectively, in the splenectomy group, and 33.3% and 59.6%, respectively, in the control group. Conclusions: Splenectomy at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer may contribute to achieve complete cytoreduction with low perioperative complication rate. This procedure seems to be an acceptable and rational intervention to increase the survival rates of those patients.
AB - Background: The aim of surgical approach in advanced ovarian cancer should be the complete removal of all visible disease. Our purpose was to compare perioperative features and postoperative complications, and secondarily oncological outcomes, between patients who underwent splenectomy and those who did not at the time of surgery. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three subjects underwent splenectomy, and we selected 99 controls with similar surgical characteristics but who did not undergo splenectomy. Data collected included perioperative details and follow-up data. Results: Longer operating time (33 minutes longer; P = 0.02), larger estimated blood loss (812 mL more; P = 0.03), higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusions (78.8% vs 42.4%; P <0.01), and intensive care unit stay (1.4 vs 0.5 days; P <0.01) aswell as higher pneumonia rate (2% vs 0%; P = 0.01) were observed in the splenectomy group. Disease-free and overall survival rateswere 30.3% and 66.6%, respectively, in the splenectomy group, and 33.3% and 59.6%, respectively, in the control group. Conclusions: Splenectomy at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer may contribute to achieve complete cytoreduction with low perioperative complication rate. This procedure seems to be an acceptable and rational intervention to increase the survival rates of those patients.
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Primary cytoreduction
KW - Splenectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863631694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863631694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182571479
DO - 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182571479
M3 - Article
C2 - 22672988
AN - SCOPUS:84863631694
VL - 22
SP - 968
EP - 973
JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
SN - 1048-891X
IS - 6
ER -