Stapled low anterior resection vs total abdominoperineal excision for distal rectal carcinoma

E. Forni, F. Meriggi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma, a successful restorative resection has obvious advantages for the patient's quality of life as compared with abdomino-perineal excision and permanent colostomy. The development of mechanical devices has allowed surgeons to perform sphincter-saving procedures in patients with distal tumors of the rectum who would otherwise be advised to have a permanent colostomy; however, the enthusiasm for extending the scope of LAR could be tempered by the fear that such an operation does not provide as radical a removal of the malignancy as an APR, so affecting local recurrence and survival adversely. Recurrence and survival rates in 94 stapled low anterior resections for carcinoma of the distal rectum (4 to 11 cm from the anal verge) performed between 1978 and 1986 were compared with those obtained in a similar historical 'control' group of 82 patients undergone abdominoperineal resection between 1965-1977 before introduction of stapling devices. There were no statistically significant differences between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection with respect to local (10.6% vs 14.6%) and distant (14.8% vs 15.8%) recurrence, and overall five-year survival (72% vs 68%). Therefore the liberal use of sphincter-saving resection for distal rectal growths does not appear to carry an increased risk of recurrence nor an unfavorable prognosis compared with APR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-19
Number of pages3
JournalChirurgia
Volume4
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Carcinoma
Recurrence
Colostomy
Rectum
Equipment and Supplies
Survival
Fear
Neoplasms
Survival Rate
Quality of Life
Control Groups
Growth
Therapeutics
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Stapled low anterior resection vs total abdominoperineal excision for distal rectal carcinoma. / Forni, E.; Meriggi, F.

In: Chirurgia, Vol. 4, No. 1-2, 1991, p. 17-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1baf97aa5dfc4a1ab9116d91c1663a16,
title = "Stapled low anterior resection vs total abdominoperineal excision for distal rectal carcinoma",
abstract = "In the surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma, a successful restorative resection has obvious advantages for the patient's quality of life as compared with abdomino-perineal excision and permanent colostomy. The development of mechanical devices has allowed surgeons to perform sphincter-saving procedures in patients with distal tumors of the rectum who would otherwise be advised to have a permanent colostomy; however, the enthusiasm for extending the scope of LAR could be tempered by the fear that such an operation does not provide as radical a removal of the malignancy as an APR, so affecting local recurrence and survival adversely. Recurrence and survival rates in 94 stapled low anterior resections for carcinoma of the distal rectum (4 to 11 cm from the anal verge) performed between 1978 and 1986 were compared with those obtained in a similar historical 'control' group of 82 patients undergone abdominoperineal resection between 1965-1977 before introduction of stapling devices. There were no statistically significant differences between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection with respect to local (10.6{\%} vs 14.6{\%}) and distant (14.8{\%} vs 15.8{\%}) recurrence, and overall five-year survival (72{\%} vs 68{\%}). Therefore the liberal use of sphincter-saving resection for distal rectal growths does not appear to carry an increased risk of recurrence nor an unfavorable prognosis compared with APR.",
author = "E. Forni and F. Meriggi",
year = "1991",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "17--19",
journal = "Chirurgia (Turin)",
issn = "0394-9508",
publisher = "Minerva Medica",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stapled low anterior resection vs total abdominoperineal excision for distal rectal carcinoma

AU - Forni, E.

AU - Meriggi, F.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - In the surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma, a successful restorative resection has obvious advantages for the patient's quality of life as compared with abdomino-perineal excision and permanent colostomy. The development of mechanical devices has allowed surgeons to perform sphincter-saving procedures in patients with distal tumors of the rectum who would otherwise be advised to have a permanent colostomy; however, the enthusiasm for extending the scope of LAR could be tempered by the fear that such an operation does not provide as radical a removal of the malignancy as an APR, so affecting local recurrence and survival adversely. Recurrence and survival rates in 94 stapled low anterior resections for carcinoma of the distal rectum (4 to 11 cm from the anal verge) performed between 1978 and 1986 were compared with those obtained in a similar historical 'control' group of 82 patients undergone abdominoperineal resection between 1965-1977 before introduction of stapling devices. There were no statistically significant differences between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection with respect to local (10.6% vs 14.6%) and distant (14.8% vs 15.8%) recurrence, and overall five-year survival (72% vs 68%). Therefore the liberal use of sphincter-saving resection for distal rectal growths does not appear to carry an increased risk of recurrence nor an unfavorable prognosis compared with APR.

AB - In the surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma, a successful restorative resection has obvious advantages for the patient's quality of life as compared with abdomino-perineal excision and permanent colostomy. The development of mechanical devices has allowed surgeons to perform sphincter-saving procedures in patients with distal tumors of the rectum who would otherwise be advised to have a permanent colostomy; however, the enthusiasm for extending the scope of LAR could be tempered by the fear that such an operation does not provide as radical a removal of the malignancy as an APR, so affecting local recurrence and survival adversely. Recurrence and survival rates in 94 stapled low anterior resections for carcinoma of the distal rectum (4 to 11 cm from the anal verge) performed between 1978 and 1986 were compared with those obtained in a similar historical 'control' group of 82 patients undergone abdominoperineal resection between 1965-1977 before introduction of stapling devices. There were no statistically significant differences between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection with respect to local (10.6% vs 14.6%) and distant (14.8% vs 15.8%) recurrence, and overall five-year survival (72% vs 68%). Therefore the liberal use of sphincter-saving resection for distal rectal growths does not appear to carry an increased risk of recurrence nor an unfavorable prognosis compared with APR.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025965347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025965347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025965347

VL - 4

SP - 17

EP - 19

JO - Chirurgia (Turin)

JF - Chirurgia (Turin)

SN - 0394-9508

IS - 1-2

ER -