State of the art in thoracoscopic surgery: A personal experience of 2000 videothoracoscopic procedures and an overview of the literature

G. C. Roviaro, F. Varoli, C. Vergani, M. Maciocco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Herein we compare our personal experience with a series of >2000 videothoracoscopic procedures with those reported in the literature to identify the procedures now accepted as the gold standard, those still regarded as investigational, and those considered unacceptable. Methods: Between June 1991 and December 2000, we performed 2068 videothoracoscopic procedures, including lung cancer staging (n = 910), wedge resections (n = 261), lobectomies (n = 221), pneumonectomies (n = 6), the diagnosis and treatment of pleural diseases (n = 200), the treatment of pneumothorax (n = 170), giant bullae (n = 57), lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema (n = 41), the diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal diseases (n = 133), the treatment of esophageal diseases (n = 39), and 30 other miscellaneous procedures. Results: A review of the literature indicates that videothoracoscopy is usually considered the preferred approach for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, the diagnosis of indeterminate pleural effusions, the treatment of malignant pleural effusions, sympathectomy, and the diagnosis and treatment of benign esophageal or mediastinal diseases. The videoendoscopic approach to LVRS for emphysema is still under evaluation. Videothoracoscopic wedge resections for the diagnosis of indeterminate nodules and the treatment of primary lung cancer, metastases, and other malignancies are still controversial due to oncologic concerns. Videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections are usually considered investigational or even unacceptable due to oncologic concerns, technical difficulties, and the risk of complications. Conclusions: Although we generally agree with the foregoing recommendations, we consider videoendoscopy the best approach for LVRS and particularly useful for the staging of lung cancer, where we always perform it as the first step of the operation. We widely perform videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections, but we believe that these procedures should only be used in strictly selected cases and at specialized centers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)881-892
Number of pages12
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Thoracoscopy
Pneumonectomy
Mediastinal Diseases
Esophageal Diseases
Lung Neoplasms
Emphysema
Pneumothorax
Pleural Diseases
Malignant Pleural Effusion
Lung
Sympathectomy
Neoplasm Staging
Pleural Effusion
Blister
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer staging
  • Esophageal disease
  • Lung disease
  • Mediastinal disease
  • Thoracic surgical procedures
  • Thoracoscopy
  • Video-assisted thoracic surgery, VATS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{e493a67a3d004822807e009f4a3d621d,
title = "State of the art in thoracoscopic surgery: A personal experience of 2000 videothoracoscopic procedures and an overview of the literature",
abstract = "Background: Herein we compare our personal experience with a series of >2000 videothoracoscopic procedures with those reported in the literature to identify the procedures now accepted as the gold standard, those still regarded as investigational, and those considered unacceptable. Methods: Between June 1991 and December 2000, we performed 2068 videothoracoscopic procedures, including lung cancer staging (n = 910), wedge resections (n = 261), lobectomies (n = 221), pneumonectomies (n = 6), the diagnosis and treatment of pleural diseases (n = 200), the treatment of pneumothorax (n = 170), giant bullae (n = 57), lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema (n = 41), the diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal diseases (n = 133), the treatment of esophageal diseases (n = 39), and 30 other miscellaneous procedures. Results: A review of the literature indicates that videothoracoscopy is usually considered the preferred approach for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, the diagnosis of indeterminate pleural effusions, the treatment of malignant pleural effusions, sympathectomy, and the diagnosis and treatment of benign esophageal or mediastinal diseases. The videoendoscopic approach to LVRS for emphysema is still under evaluation. Videothoracoscopic wedge resections for the diagnosis of indeterminate nodules and the treatment of primary lung cancer, metastases, and other malignancies are still controversial due to oncologic concerns. Videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections are usually considered investigational or even unacceptable due to oncologic concerns, technical difficulties, and the risk of complications. Conclusions: Although we generally agree with the foregoing recommendations, we consider videoendoscopy the best approach for LVRS and particularly useful for the staging of lung cancer, where we always perform it as the first step of the operation. We widely perform videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections, but we believe that these procedures should only be used in strictly selected cases and at specialized centers.",
keywords = "Cancer staging, Esophageal disease, Lung disease, Mediastinal disease, Thoracic surgical procedures, Thoracoscopy, Video-assisted thoracic surgery, VATS",
author = "Roviaro, {G. C.} and F. Varoli and C. Vergani and M. Maciocco",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-001-8153-3",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "881--892",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State of the art in thoracoscopic surgery

T2 - A personal experience of 2000 videothoracoscopic procedures and an overview of the literature

AU - Roviaro, G. C.

AU - Varoli, F.

AU - Vergani, C.

AU - Maciocco, M.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background: Herein we compare our personal experience with a series of >2000 videothoracoscopic procedures with those reported in the literature to identify the procedures now accepted as the gold standard, those still regarded as investigational, and those considered unacceptable. Methods: Between June 1991 and December 2000, we performed 2068 videothoracoscopic procedures, including lung cancer staging (n = 910), wedge resections (n = 261), lobectomies (n = 221), pneumonectomies (n = 6), the diagnosis and treatment of pleural diseases (n = 200), the treatment of pneumothorax (n = 170), giant bullae (n = 57), lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema (n = 41), the diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal diseases (n = 133), the treatment of esophageal diseases (n = 39), and 30 other miscellaneous procedures. Results: A review of the literature indicates that videothoracoscopy is usually considered the preferred approach for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, the diagnosis of indeterminate pleural effusions, the treatment of malignant pleural effusions, sympathectomy, and the diagnosis and treatment of benign esophageal or mediastinal diseases. The videoendoscopic approach to LVRS for emphysema is still under evaluation. Videothoracoscopic wedge resections for the diagnosis of indeterminate nodules and the treatment of primary lung cancer, metastases, and other malignancies are still controversial due to oncologic concerns. Videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections are usually considered investigational or even unacceptable due to oncologic concerns, technical difficulties, and the risk of complications. Conclusions: Although we generally agree with the foregoing recommendations, we consider videoendoscopy the best approach for LVRS and particularly useful for the staging of lung cancer, where we always perform it as the first step of the operation. We widely perform videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections, but we believe that these procedures should only be used in strictly selected cases and at specialized centers.

AB - Background: Herein we compare our personal experience with a series of >2000 videothoracoscopic procedures with those reported in the literature to identify the procedures now accepted as the gold standard, those still regarded as investigational, and those considered unacceptable. Methods: Between June 1991 and December 2000, we performed 2068 videothoracoscopic procedures, including lung cancer staging (n = 910), wedge resections (n = 261), lobectomies (n = 221), pneumonectomies (n = 6), the diagnosis and treatment of pleural diseases (n = 200), the treatment of pneumothorax (n = 170), giant bullae (n = 57), lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema (n = 41), the diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal diseases (n = 133), the treatment of esophageal diseases (n = 39), and 30 other miscellaneous procedures. Results: A review of the literature indicates that videothoracoscopy is usually considered the preferred approach for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, the diagnosis of indeterminate pleural effusions, the treatment of malignant pleural effusions, sympathectomy, and the diagnosis and treatment of benign esophageal or mediastinal diseases. The videoendoscopic approach to LVRS for emphysema is still under evaluation. Videothoracoscopic wedge resections for the diagnosis of indeterminate nodules and the treatment of primary lung cancer, metastases, and other malignancies are still controversial due to oncologic concerns. Videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections are usually considered investigational or even unacceptable due to oncologic concerns, technical difficulties, and the risk of complications. Conclusions: Although we generally agree with the foregoing recommendations, we consider videoendoscopy the best approach for LVRS and particularly useful for the staging of lung cancer, where we always perform it as the first step of the operation. We widely perform videoendoscopic major pulmonary resections, but we believe that these procedures should only be used in strictly selected cases and at specialized centers.

KW - Cancer staging

KW - Esophageal disease

KW - Lung disease

KW - Mediastinal disease

KW - Thoracic surgical procedures

KW - Thoracoscopy

KW - Video-assisted thoracic surgery, VATS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035983902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035983902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-001-8153-3

DO - 10.1007/s00464-001-8153-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 12163949

AN - SCOPUS:0035983902

VL - 16

SP - 881

EP - 892

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 6

ER -