STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die: A comparison between classifications

Serafina Valente, Chiara Lazzeri, Marco Chiostri, Lusinda Osmanagaj, Cristina Giglioli, Gian Franco Gensini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background In patients with acute coronary syndromes, an increase in hemorrhagic complications has been observed, and bleeding is now the most frequent noncardiac complication in these patients. Clinical trials and registries have used different scales to classify the severity of bleeding; so far, none of them has been developed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We analyzed data from our Intensive Cardiac Care Florence STEMI Registry, comprising 991 STEMI patients consecutively admitted to our intensive cardiac care unit after mechanical revascularization, to assess the clinical impact of both Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) classifications in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for in-hospital mortality. Results Major bleeding events occurred in 8.9% of patients (88/991) in the TIMI classification and in 17.2% of patients (170/991) in the ACUITY classification. Among patients with major bleeding classified according to ACUITY, 82 patients did not meet the TIMI criteria for major bleeding. These patients represent the so-called gray zone, where no transfusion was performed and only 1 patient died. Conclusions In STEMI patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention and receive dual antiplatelet therapy, TIMI is more capable than ACUITY in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for early mortality. The presence of renal failure represents an independent predictor for major bleeding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-96
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Myocardial Infarction
Hemorrhage
Triage
Catheterization
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Registries
Critical Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Hospital Mortality
Renal Insufficiency
Intensive Care Units
Clinical Trials
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Valente, S., Lazzeri, C., Chiostri, M., Osmanagaj, L., Giglioli, C., & Gensini, G. F. (2011). STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die: A comparison between classifications. Clinical Cardiology, 34(2), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20842

STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die : A comparison between classifications. / Valente, Serafina; Lazzeri, Chiara; Chiostri, Marco; Osmanagaj, Lusinda; Giglioli, Cristina; Gensini, Gian Franco.

In: Clinical Cardiology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 90-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valente, S, Lazzeri, C, Chiostri, M, Osmanagaj, L, Giglioli, C & Gensini, GF 2011, 'STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die: A comparison between classifications', Clinical Cardiology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20842
Valente S, Lazzeri C, Chiostri M, Osmanagaj L, Giglioli C, Gensini GF. STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die: A comparison between classifications. Clinical Cardiology. 2011 Feb;34(2):90-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20842
Valente, Serafina ; Lazzeri, Chiara ; Chiostri, Marco ; Osmanagaj, Lusinda ; Giglioli, Cristina ; Gensini, Gian Franco. / STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die : A comparison between classifications. In: Clinical Cardiology. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 90-96.
@article{12e6259b6cfe4f4196c9f9dad19c6e18,
title = "STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die: A comparison between classifications",
abstract = "Background In patients with acute coronary syndromes, an increase in hemorrhagic complications has been observed, and bleeding is now the most frequent noncardiac complication in these patients. Clinical trials and registries have used different scales to classify the severity of bleeding; so far, none of them has been developed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We analyzed data from our Intensive Cardiac Care Florence STEMI Registry, comprising 991 STEMI patients consecutively admitted to our intensive cardiac care unit after mechanical revascularization, to assess the clinical impact of both Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) classifications in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for in-hospital mortality. Results Major bleeding events occurred in 8.9{\%} of patients (88/991) in the TIMI classification and in 17.2{\%} of patients (170/991) in the ACUITY classification. Among patients with major bleeding classified according to ACUITY, 82 patients did not meet the TIMI criteria for major bleeding. These patients represent the so-called gray zone, where no transfusion was performed and only 1 patient died. Conclusions In STEMI patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention and receive dual antiplatelet therapy, TIMI is more capable than ACUITY in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for early mortality. The presence of renal failure represents an independent predictor for major bleeding.",
author = "Serafina Valente and Chiara Lazzeri and Marco Chiostri and Lusinda Osmanagaj and Cristina Giglioli and Gensini, {Gian Franco}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/clc.20842",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "90--96",
journal = "Clinical Cardiology",
issn = "0160-9289",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - STEMI patients - The more you bleed, the more you die

T2 - A comparison between classifications

AU - Valente, Serafina

AU - Lazzeri, Chiara

AU - Chiostri, Marco

AU - Osmanagaj, Lusinda

AU - Giglioli, Cristina

AU - Gensini, Gian Franco

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Background In patients with acute coronary syndromes, an increase in hemorrhagic complications has been observed, and bleeding is now the most frequent noncardiac complication in these patients. Clinical trials and registries have used different scales to classify the severity of bleeding; so far, none of them has been developed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We analyzed data from our Intensive Cardiac Care Florence STEMI Registry, comprising 991 STEMI patients consecutively admitted to our intensive cardiac care unit after mechanical revascularization, to assess the clinical impact of both Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) classifications in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for in-hospital mortality. Results Major bleeding events occurred in 8.9% of patients (88/991) in the TIMI classification and in 17.2% of patients (170/991) in the ACUITY classification. Among patients with major bleeding classified according to ACUITY, 82 patients did not meet the TIMI criteria for major bleeding. These patients represent the so-called gray zone, where no transfusion was performed and only 1 patient died. Conclusions In STEMI patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention and receive dual antiplatelet therapy, TIMI is more capable than ACUITY in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for early mortality. The presence of renal failure represents an independent predictor for major bleeding.

AB - Background In patients with acute coronary syndromes, an increase in hemorrhagic complications has been observed, and bleeding is now the most frequent noncardiac complication in these patients. Clinical trials and registries have used different scales to classify the severity of bleeding; so far, none of them has been developed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods We analyzed data from our Intensive Cardiac Care Florence STEMI Registry, comprising 991 STEMI patients consecutively admitted to our intensive cardiac care unit after mechanical revascularization, to assess the clinical impact of both Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) classifications in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for in-hospital mortality. Results Major bleeding events occurred in 8.9% of patients (88/991) in the TIMI classification and in 17.2% of patients (170/991) in the ACUITY classification. Among patients with major bleeding classified according to ACUITY, 82 patients did not meet the TIMI criteria for major bleeding. These patients represent the so-called gray zone, where no transfusion was performed and only 1 patient died. Conclusions In STEMI patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention and receive dual antiplatelet therapy, TIMI is more capable than ACUITY in identifying patients with major bleeding at higher risk for early mortality. The presence of renal failure represents an independent predictor for major bleeding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751480465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751480465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/clc.20842

DO - 10.1002/clc.20842

M3 - Article

C2 - 21298652

AN - SCOPUS:79751480465

VL - 34

SP - 90

EP - 96

JO - Clinical Cardiology

JF - Clinical Cardiology

SN - 0160-9289

IS - 2

ER -