ST/G ACL reconstruction: Double strand plus extra-articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3-year follow-up

S. Zaffagnini, D. Bruni, A. Russo, Y. Takazawa, M. Lo Presti, G. Giordano, M. Marcacci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several investigators have reported the presence of biomechanical, kinematic, anatomic, fiber orientation patterns and biological differences between the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle of ACL. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical, instrumental and X-ray outcome of two ACL reconstruction techniques with hamstring tendons: one with a single intra-articular bundle associated to an extra-articular sling, the second with a more anatomic double-bundle technique that reproduces better the native ACL function. From an initial group of 100 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, 72 patients (35 single bundle plus lateral plasty and 37 double bundle) were evaluated with IKDC, Tegner score, KT2000 arthrometer, Activity Rating Scale, Psychovitality Questionnaire and Ahlback radiographic score at a mean 3 years follow-up. Double-bundle group showed significantly better results regarding IKDC, ROM, Activity Rating Scale and time to return to sport. Also KT 2000 showed significant differences in objective stability. The double-bundle technique for ACL reconstruction described in this paper has demonstrated significantly better subjective, objective and functional results compared with a double-stranded hamstrings plus extra-articular sling at a minimum 3-year follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-581
Number of pages9
JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Joints
Biomechanical Phenomena
Research Personnel
X-Rays
Prospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Return to Sport
Hamstring Tendons

Keywords

  • ACL reconstruction
  • Arthroscopy
  • Comparative study
  • Double bundle
  • Surgical technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

ST/G ACL reconstruction : Double strand plus extra-articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3-year follow-up. / Zaffagnini, S.; Bruni, D.; Russo, A.; Takazawa, Y.; Lo Presti, M.; Giordano, G.; Marcacci, M.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Vol. 18, No. 5, 10.2008, p. 573-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cc1fbfbee2246ab82bdee77b156a5f9,
title = "ST/G ACL reconstruction: Double strand plus extra-articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3-year follow-up",
abstract = "Several investigators have reported the presence of biomechanical, kinematic, anatomic, fiber orientation patterns and biological differences between the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle of ACL. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical, instrumental and X-ray outcome of two ACL reconstruction techniques with hamstring tendons: one with a single intra-articular bundle associated to an extra-articular sling, the second with a more anatomic double-bundle technique that reproduces better the native ACL function. From an initial group of 100 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, 72 patients (35 single bundle plus lateral plasty and 37 double bundle) were evaluated with IKDC, Tegner score, KT2000 arthrometer, Activity Rating Scale, Psychovitality Questionnaire and Ahlback radiographic score at a mean 3 years follow-up. Double-bundle group showed significantly better results regarding IKDC, ROM, Activity Rating Scale and time to return to sport. Also KT 2000 showed significant differences in objective stability. The double-bundle technique for ACL reconstruction described in this paper has demonstrated significantly better subjective, objective and functional results compared with a double-stranded hamstrings plus extra-articular sling at a minimum 3-year follow-up.",
keywords = "ACL reconstruction, Arthroscopy, Comparative study, Double bundle, Surgical technique",
author = "S. Zaffagnini and D. Bruni and A. Russo and Y. Takazawa and {Lo Presti}, M. and G. Giordano and M. Marcacci",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00697.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "573--581",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports",
issn = "0905-7188",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ST/G ACL reconstruction

T2 - Double strand plus extra-articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3-year follow-up

AU - Zaffagnini, S.

AU - Bruni, D.

AU - Russo, A.

AU - Takazawa, Y.

AU - Lo Presti, M.

AU - Giordano, G.

AU - Marcacci, M.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Several investigators have reported the presence of biomechanical, kinematic, anatomic, fiber orientation patterns and biological differences between the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle of ACL. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical, instrumental and X-ray outcome of two ACL reconstruction techniques with hamstring tendons: one with a single intra-articular bundle associated to an extra-articular sling, the second with a more anatomic double-bundle technique that reproduces better the native ACL function. From an initial group of 100 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, 72 patients (35 single bundle plus lateral plasty and 37 double bundle) were evaluated with IKDC, Tegner score, KT2000 arthrometer, Activity Rating Scale, Psychovitality Questionnaire and Ahlback radiographic score at a mean 3 years follow-up. Double-bundle group showed significantly better results regarding IKDC, ROM, Activity Rating Scale and time to return to sport. Also KT 2000 showed significant differences in objective stability. The double-bundle technique for ACL reconstruction described in this paper has demonstrated significantly better subjective, objective and functional results compared with a double-stranded hamstrings plus extra-articular sling at a minimum 3-year follow-up.

AB - Several investigators have reported the presence of biomechanical, kinematic, anatomic, fiber orientation patterns and biological differences between the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle of ACL. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical, instrumental and X-ray outcome of two ACL reconstruction techniques with hamstring tendons: one with a single intra-articular bundle associated to an extra-articular sling, the second with a more anatomic double-bundle technique that reproduces better the native ACL function. From an initial group of 100 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, 72 patients (35 single bundle plus lateral plasty and 37 double bundle) were evaluated with IKDC, Tegner score, KT2000 arthrometer, Activity Rating Scale, Psychovitality Questionnaire and Ahlback radiographic score at a mean 3 years follow-up. Double-bundle group showed significantly better results regarding IKDC, ROM, Activity Rating Scale and time to return to sport. Also KT 2000 showed significant differences in objective stability. The double-bundle technique for ACL reconstruction described in this paper has demonstrated significantly better subjective, objective and functional results compared with a double-stranded hamstrings plus extra-articular sling at a minimum 3-year follow-up.

KW - ACL reconstruction

KW - Arthroscopy

KW - Comparative study

KW - Double bundle

KW - Surgical technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52249118552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52249118552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00697.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00697.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18208432

AN - SCOPUS:52249118552

VL - 18

SP - 573

EP - 581

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

SN - 0905-7188

IS - 5

ER -