Stress responses of PML nuclear domains are ablated by ataxin-I and other nucleoprotein inclusions

Claire L. Dovey, Archana Varadaraj, Andrew H. Wyllie, Tina Rich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The polyglutamine diseases are characterized by expansion of triplet CAG repeats that encode polyglutamine tracts in otherwise unrelated proteins. One plausible explanation for the neurodegeneration of these disorders proposes that inclusions of such proteins sequester other significant nuclear proteins in inactive form. The present study shows that PML protein is sequestered by inclusions of the pathogenic mutant form of the polyglutamine protein ataxin-1 and that this sequestration removes from the nucleus the free 0.2-1 μm diameter PML nuclear domains (PML-NDs), together with at least one of their many cargo proteins (Sp100). The present study demonstrates that this sequestration can be effected equally by another nuclear protein, RED, which lacks a polyglutamine tract, but expresses a polar zipper repeat. The sequestered PML-NDs no longer respond to stress signals (heat shock or ionizing radiation) to which they are normally sensitive. In both cases, there is independent evidence that the cells initiate other responses to their injury (nuclear translocation of heat shock protein or generation of gamma-H2AX-rich nuclear foci, respectively). The data thus provide strong evidence that multiple species of nuclear inclusion functionally sequester PML-NDs. This mechanism is likely to distort cellular responses to injury of many different types.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-883
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pathology
Volume203
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004

Keywords

  • Ataxin-1
  • PML-NDs
  • Polyglutamine
  • Stress response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stress responses of PML nuclear domains are ablated by ataxin-I and other nucleoprotein inclusions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this