Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants: A short literature review

A. Baj, L. Lo Muzio, D. Lauritano, V. Candotto, G. E. Mancini, A. B. Gianni

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported restorations has become a successful therapy resulting in high survival rate (SR). Recently, some reports have stated that submerged implants have no differences in SR compared to transmucosal implants. It was also reported that a reduction in timing of implant loading (from 12-24 weeks to 6-8 weeks) does not affect the predictability and SR of the implants. In particular, the reduction of the loading period is well accepted by the full edentulous patient, due to the functional and aesthetic problems related to denture wearing. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the SR of immediate loading implants (ILIs) compared to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the help of computer guided implant dentistry. The aim of this short review is therefore, to assess whether ILIs achieve similar clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols. As stated in preview reviews, we can affirm that there is no difference in SR at ILIs against delayed implants and with respect to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the use of computer guided implant dentistry. Keeping in mind the limitations of the present review, we can affirm that ILIs have a similar SR when compared to conventional loading protocols.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-188
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents
Volume30
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Survival Rate
Dentistry
Mouth Rehabilitation
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Dentures
Esthetics
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bone graft
  • Computer guided implant dentistry
  • Conventional loading
  • Immediate loading
  • Native bone
  • Post-extraction sites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants : A short literature review. / Baj, A.; Muzio, L. Lo; Lauritano, D.; Candotto, V.; Mancini, G. E.; Gianni, A. B.

In: Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 183-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Baj, A. ; Muzio, L. Lo ; Lauritano, D. ; Candotto, V. ; Mancini, G. E. ; Gianni, A. B. / Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants : A short literature review. In: Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 183-188.
@article{fed99eff77c44515921e676560034f06,
title = "Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants: A short literature review",
abstract = "Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported restorations has become a successful therapy resulting in high survival rate (SR). Recently, some reports have stated that submerged implants have no differences in SR compared to transmucosal implants. It was also reported that a reduction in timing of implant loading (from 12-24 weeks to 6-8 weeks) does not affect the predictability and SR of the implants. In particular, the reduction of the loading period is well accepted by the full edentulous patient, due to the functional and aesthetic problems related to denture wearing. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the SR of immediate loading implants (ILIs) compared to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the help of computer guided implant dentistry. The aim of this short review is therefore, to assess whether ILIs achieve similar clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols. As stated in preview reviews, we can affirm that there is no difference in SR at ILIs against delayed implants and with respect to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the use of computer guided implant dentistry. Keeping in mind the limitations of the present review, we can affirm that ILIs have a similar SR when compared to conventional loading protocols.",
keywords = "Bone graft, Computer guided implant dentistry, Conventional loading, Immediate loading, Native bone, Post-extraction sites",
author = "A. Baj and Muzio, {L. Lo} and D. Lauritano and V. Candotto and Mancini, {G. E.} and Gianni, {A. B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "183--188",
journal = "Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents",
issn = "0393-974X",
publisher = "Biolife s.a.s.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants

T2 - A short literature review

AU - Baj, A.

AU - Muzio, L. Lo

AU - Lauritano, D.

AU - Candotto, V.

AU - Mancini, G. E.

AU - Gianni, A. B.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported restorations has become a successful therapy resulting in high survival rate (SR). Recently, some reports have stated that submerged implants have no differences in SR compared to transmucosal implants. It was also reported that a reduction in timing of implant loading (from 12-24 weeks to 6-8 weeks) does not affect the predictability and SR of the implants. In particular, the reduction of the loading period is well accepted by the full edentulous patient, due to the functional and aesthetic problems related to denture wearing. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the SR of immediate loading implants (ILIs) compared to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the help of computer guided implant dentistry. The aim of this short review is therefore, to assess whether ILIs achieve similar clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols. As stated in preview reviews, we can affirm that there is no difference in SR at ILIs against delayed implants and with respect to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the use of computer guided implant dentistry. Keeping in mind the limitations of the present review, we can affirm that ILIs have a similar SR when compared to conventional loading protocols.

AB - Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported restorations has become a successful therapy resulting in high survival rate (SR). Recently, some reports have stated that submerged implants have no differences in SR compared to transmucosal implants. It was also reported that a reduction in timing of implant loading (from 12-24 weeks to 6-8 weeks) does not affect the predictability and SR of the implants. In particular, the reduction of the loading period is well accepted by the full edentulous patient, due to the functional and aesthetic problems related to denture wearing. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the SR of immediate loading implants (ILIs) compared to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the help of computer guided implant dentistry. The aim of this short review is therefore, to assess whether ILIs achieve similar clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols. As stated in preview reviews, we can affirm that there is no difference in SR at ILIs against delayed implants and with respect to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the use of computer guided implant dentistry. Keeping in mind the limitations of the present review, we can affirm that ILIs have a similar SR when compared to conventional loading protocols.

KW - Bone graft

KW - Computer guided implant dentistry

KW - Conventional loading

KW - Immediate loading

KW - Native bone

KW - Post-extraction sites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992669606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992669606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84992669606

VL - 30

SP - 183

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents

JF - Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents

SN - 0393-974X

IS - 2

ER -