Successful publishing: How to get your paper accepted

Riccardo A. Audisio, Rolf A. Stahel, Matti S. Aapro, Alberto Costa, Manoj Pandey, Nicholas Pavlidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-356
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Oncology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Publications
Pleasure
Ethics
Reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Audisio, R. A., Stahel, R. A., Aapro, M. S., Costa, A., Pandey, M., & Pavlidis, N. (2009). Successful publishing: How to get your paper accepted. Surgical Oncology, 18(4), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001

Successful publishing : How to get your paper accepted. / Audisio, Riccardo A.; Stahel, Rolf A.; Aapro, Matti S.; Costa, Alberto; Pandey, Manoj; Pavlidis, Nicholas.

In: Surgical Oncology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 350-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Audisio, RA, Stahel, RA, Aapro, MS, Costa, A, Pandey, M & Pavlidis, N 2009, 'Successful publishing: How to get your paper accepted', Surgical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001
Audisio RA, Stahel RA, Aapro MS, Costa A, Pandey M, Pavlidis N. Successful publishing: How to get your paper accepted. Surgical Oncology. 2009 Dec;18(4):350-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001
Audisio, Riccardo A. ; Stahel, Rolf A. ; Aapro, Matti S. ; Costa, Alberto ; Pandey, Manoj ; Pavlidis, Nicholas. / Successful publishing : How to get your paper accepted. In: Surgical Oncology. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 350-356.
@article{73d41e9093744555b544c081a7f25619,
title = "Successful publishing: How to get your paper accepted",
abstract = "Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.",
author = "Audisio, {Riccardo A.} and Stahel, {Rolf A.} and Aapro, {Matti S.} and Alberto Costa and Manoj Pandey and Nicholas Pavlidis",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "350--356",
journal = "Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0960-7404",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Successful publishing

T2 - How to get your paper accepted

AU - Audisio, Riccardo A.

AU - Stahel, Rolf A.

AU - Aapro, Matti S.

AU - Costa, Alberto

AU - Pandey, Manoj

AU - Pavlidis, Nicholas

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.

AB - Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350755631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350755631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 18849161

AN - SCOPUS:70350755631

VL - 18

SP - 350

EP - 356

JO - Surgical Oncology

JF - Surgical Oncology

SN - 0960-7404

IS - 4

ER -