Abstract
Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 350-356 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Surgical Oncology |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2009 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Surgery
Cite this
Successful publishing : How to get your paper accepted. / Audisio, Riccardo A.; Stahel, Rolf A.; Aapro, Matti S.; Costa, Alberto; Pandey, Manoj; Pavlidis, Nicholas.
In: Surgical Oncology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 350-356.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Successful publishing
T2 - How to get your paper accepted
AU - Audisio, Riccardo A.
AU - Stahel, Rolf A.
AU - Aapro, Matti S.
AU - Costa, Alberto
AU - Pandey, Manoj
AU - Pavlidis, Nicholas
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.
AB - Medical science is rapidly evolving and an incredible number of publications are being published. Are they all worth reading? Authors are deemed responsible for what they put down in writing; whether they are first or corresponding author, it really makes no difference. Editors of peer-reviewed international journals have agreed to share their views with the readership, in order to optimise the quality of contributions as well as to assist junior colleagues in their editorial efforts. Starting from an historical perspective, ethical issues in publishing are discussed and technical suggestions on how to get the final draft accepted for publication are outlined. Contributing towards medical science is a great pleasure to be experienced and shared.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350755631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350755631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 18849161
AN - SCOPUS:70350755631
VL - 18
SP - 350
EP - 356
JO - Surgical Oncology
JF - Surgical Oncology
SN - 0960-7404
IS - 4
ER -