Surgical treatment in patient with non-small-cell lung cancer with fissure involvement: Anatomical versus nonanatomical resection

Giovanni Leuzzi, Alfredo Cesario, Stefano Cafarotti, Filippo Lococo, Valentina Dall'Armi, Pierluigi Novellis, Rosalia Romano, Alessandra Siciliani, Elisa Meacci, Pierluigi Granone, Stefano Margaritora

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the intense debate concerning the prognostic impact of fissure involvement (FI) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, no specific surgical strategies have been yet recommended when this condition occurs. In this setting, we report our monocentric 10-years experience to investigate this issue. METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2010, the clinical data of 40 non-small-cell lung cancer patients with FI undergoing curative resection were retrospectively reviewed. The sample was stratified according to the type of resection: group A (28 patients): anatomical resection (bilobectomy [21 patients], pneumonectomy [7 patients]); group B (12 patients): nonanatomical resection (lobectomy plus wedge resection [LWR]). The end-points were (1) impact of different surgical approach on the pulmonary function (measured before surgery and 1 month after discharge); (2) disease-specific survival; and (3) tumor recurrence.The t test, χ, and log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox and logistic regression analyses were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: No differences between the two groups were found when comparing the clinical characteristics, histology, pN or pT status, p-stage, residual (R1) disease, tumor grading, or tumor size. Similarly, the baseline preoperative function (tested as forced expiratory volume in 1 second-%-predicted, FEV1%) was likewise comparable (92.5% ± 21.0% in group A versus 85.2% ± 20.0% in group B; p = not significant). The decline of FEV1% after surgery was slightly higher in group A (-24.9% ± 13.5%) when compared with that in group B (-19.5% ± 13.3%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = ns). Nevertheless, the 5-year disease-specific survival was 56% for group A and 47% for group B (p = ns). The recurrence rate did not differ between the patients undergoing a LWR (3 of 12 patients) and those undergoing a bilobectomy or pneumonectomy (9 of 28 patients) (p = ns). The presence of FI extended for more than 3 cm was found to be the most significant prognostic factor when analyzing survival (p = 0.002) and recurrence rate (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that nonanatomical resection (LWR) could be considered as a feasible surgical option (especially in "frail" patients with an extent of FI less than 3 cm) in the light of the similar oncological and functional outcome compared with anatomical resection. Further studies based on larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary data and also to investigate the impact on the postoperative quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-108
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Fissure
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second
  • Non-small-cell lung cancer
  • Visceral pleura

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical treatment in patient with non-small-cell lung cancer with fissure involvement: Anatomical versus nonanatomical resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this