Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies: A 171-patient series

Andrea Talacchi, Sergio Turazzi, Francesca Locatelli, Francesco Sala, Alberto Beltramello, Franco Alessandrini, Paolo Manganotti, Paola Lanteri, Roberta Gambin, Mario Ganau, Vincenzo Tramontano, Barbara Santini, Massimo Gerosa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last few years much has been published to validate new technology in brain mapping for clinical purposes, but there have been few clinical results. In this report we describe our five-year experience in the surgical management of malignant gliomas around motor areas with an evaluation of the impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plus navigator and intraoperative neurophysiology (IN). End-points were extent of removal, morbidity, and survival. Variables describing patient and tumor characteristics and treatment modalities were statistically weighted in relation to treatment outcome. Tumor depth (P = 0.01), midline shift ≥1 cm. (P = 0.05), and insular location (P = 0.001) negatively affected extent of removal, whereas IN (P <0.001) and fMRI plus navigator (P = 0.02) contributed to increasing the rate of total removal (73%, 71% vs. 40%). Postoperative motor impairment was mild and transient in a minority of cases (20%). General complications, as defined by the Glioma Outcome Project, occurred in 23% of cases. IN was the only factor associated with acute postoperative motor deterioration (P <0.001). IN and age >65 years (P = 0.01) were associated with the occurrence of complications. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients operated with IN or fMRI plus navigator (P <0.01). Comparing different surgical strategies used in the same period, we observed that supportive technologies in glioma surgery have their primary impact on the quality of resection and survival. IN led to transient motor impairment and some additional complications which did not affect functional outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-426
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Neurophysiology
Motor Cortex
Glioma
Technology
Survival
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain Mapping
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Brain tumors
  • Functional magnetic resonance
  • Intraoperative neurophysiology
  • Motor pathways
  • Surgical treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Talacchi, A., Turazzi, S., Locatelli, F., Sala, F., Beltramello, A., Alessandrini, F., ... Gerosa, M. (2010). Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies: A 171-patient series. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 100(3), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0193-x

Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies : A 171-patient series. / Talacchi, Andrea; Turazzi, Sergio; Locatelli, Francesca; Sala, Francesco; Beltramello, Alberto; Alessandrini, Franco; Manganotti, Paolo; Lanteri, Paola; Gambin, Roberta; Ganau, Mario; Tramontano, Vincenzo; Santini, Barbara; Gerosa, Massimo.

In: Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Vol. 100, No. 3, 12.2010, p. 417-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Talacchi, A, Turazzi, S, Locatelli, F, Sala, F, Beltramello, A, Alessandrini, F, Manganotti, P, Lanteri, P, Gambin, R, Ganau, M, Tramontano, V, Santini, B & Gerosa, M 2010, 'Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies: A 171-patient series', Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0193-x
Talacchi, Andrea ; Turazzi, Sergio ; Locatelli, Francesca ; Sala, Francesco ; Beltramello, Alberto ; Alessandrini, Franco ; Manganotti, Paolo ; Lanteri, Paola ; Gambin, Roberta ; Ganau, Mario ; Tramontano, Vincenzo ; Santini, Barbara ; Gerosa, Massimo. / Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies : A 171-patient series. In: Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2010 ; Vol. 100, No. 3. pp. 417-426.
@article{012b647aaac14e99a8047f37438b56c1,
title = "Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies: A 171-patient series",
abstract = "In the last few years much has been published to validate new technology in brain mapping for clinical purposes, but there have been few clinical results. In this report we describe our five-year experience in the surgical management of malignant gliomas around motor areas with an evaluation of the impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plus navigator and intraoperative neurophysiology (IN). End-points were extent of removal, morbidity, and survival. Variables describing patient and tumor characteristics and treatment modalities were statistically weighted in relation to treatment outcome. Tumor depth (P = 0.01), midline shift ≥1 cm. (P = 0.05), and insular location (P = 0.001) negatively affected extent of removal, whereas IN (P <0.001) and fMRI plus navigator (P = 0.02) contributed to increasing the rate of total removal (73{\%}, 71{\%} vs. 40{\%}). Postoperative motor impairment was mild and transient in a minority of cases (20{\%}). General complications, as defined by the Glioma Outcome Project, occurred in 23{\%} of cases. IN was the only factor associated with acute postoperative motor deterioration (P <0.001). IN and age >65 years (P = 0.01) were associated with the occurrence of complications. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients operated with IN or fMRI plus navigator (P <0.01). Comparing different surgical strategies used in the same period, we observed that supportive technologies in glioma surgery have their primary impact on the quality of resection and survival. IN led to transient motor impairment and some additional complications which did not affect functional outcome.",
keywords = "Brain tumors, Functional magnetic resonance, Intraoperative neurophysiology, Motor pathways, Surgical treatment",
author = "Andrea Talacchi and Sergio Turazzi and Francesca Locatelli and Francesco Sala and Alberto Beltramello and Franco Alessandrini and Paolo Manganotti and Paola Lanteri and Roberta Gambin and Mario Ganau and Vincenzo Tramontano and Barbara Santini and Massimo Gerosa",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11060-010-0193-x",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "417--426",
journal = "Journal of Neuro-Oncology",
issn = "0167-594X",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. the impact of different supportive technologies

T2 - A 171-patient series

AU - Talacchi, Andrea

AU - Turazzi, Sergio

AU - Locatelli, Francesca

AU - Sala, Francesco

AU - Beltramello, Alberto

AU - Alessandrini, Franco

AU - Manganotti, Paolo

AU - Lanteri, Paola

AU - Gambin, Roberta

AU - Ganau, Mario

AU - Tramontano, Vincenzo

AU - Santini, Barbara

AU - Gerosa, Massimo

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - In the last few years much has been published to validate new technology in brain mapping for clinical purposes, but there have been few clinical results. In this report we describe our five-year experience in the surgical management of malignant gliomas around motor areas with an evaluation of the impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plus navigator and intraoperative neurophysiology (IN). End-points were extent of removal, morbidity, and survival. Variables describing patient and tumor characteristics and treatment modalities were statistically weighted in relation to treatment outcome. Tumor depth (P = 0.01), midline shift ≥1 cm. (P = 0.05), and insular location (P = 0.001) negatively affected extent of removal, whereas IN (P <0.001) and fMRI plus navigator (P = 0.02) contributed to increasing the rate of total removal (73%, 71% vs. 40%). Postoperative motor impairment was mild and transient in a minority of cases (20%). General complications, as defined by the Glioma Outcome Project, occurred in 23% of cases. IN was the only factor associated with acute postoperative motor deterioration (P <0.001). IN and age >65 years (P = 0.01) were associated with the occurrence of complications. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients operated with IN or fMRI plus navigator (P <0.01). Comparing different surgical strategies used in the same period, we observed that supportive technologies in glioma surgery have their primary impact on the quality of resection and survival. IN led to transient motor impairment and some additional complications which did not affect functional outcome.

AB - In the last few years much has been published to validate new technology in brain mapping for clinical purposes, but there have been few clinical results. In this report we describe our five-year experience in the surgical management of malignant gliomas around motor areas with an evaluation of the impact of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plus navigator and intraoperative neurophysiology (IN). End-points were extent of removal, morbidity, and survival. Variables describing patient and tumor characteristics and treatment modalities were statistically weighted in relation to treatment outcome. Tumor depth (P = 0.01), midline shift ≥1 cm. (P = 0.05), and insular location (P = 0.001) negatively affected extent of removal, whereas IN (P <0.001) and fMRI plus navigator (P = 0.02) contributed to increasing the rate of total removal (73%, 71% vs. 40%). Postoperative motor impairment was mild and transient in a minority of cases (20%). General complications, as defined by the Glioma Outcome Project, occurred in 23% of cases. IN was the only factor associated with acute postoperative motor deterioration (P <0.001). IN and age >65 years (P = 0.01) were associated with the occurrence of complications. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients operated with IN or fMRI plus navigator (P <0.01). Comparing different surgical strategies used in the same period, we observed that supportive technologies in glioma surgery have their primary impact on the quality of resection and survival. IN led to transient motor impairment and some additional complications which did not affect functional outcome.

KW - Brain tumors

KW - Functional magnetic resonance

KW - Intraoperative neurophysiology

KW - Motor pathways

KW - Surgical treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449271836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449271836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11060-010-0193-x

DO - 10.1007/s11060-010-0193-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20467787

AN - SCOPUS:78449271836

VL - 100

SP - 417

EP - 426

JO - Journal of Neuro-Oncology

JF - Journal of Neuro-Oncology

SN - 0167-594X

IS - 3

ER -