Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases

Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Elisa Pala, Carlo Romagnoli, Matteo Romantini, Teresa Calabro, Pietro Ruggieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Previous studies reported on surgical indications for patients with femoral metastases. However, few studies analyzed the spectrum of femoral metastatic presentation. We performed this study to evaluate the survival of patients with femoral metastases, and clarify the treatment of femoral impending and actual pathological fractures. Materials and Methods We retrospectively studied 110 patients with femoral metastases from various cancers treated with nailing or resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction from 1995 to 2010. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Survival was analyzed with respect to different metastatic presentations regarding gender, type of cancer, number, and location of femoral metastases, type of surgery, and pathological fracture. Results Univariate predictors of survival were the pathological fracture and type of surgery; multivariate predictor was only the pathological fracture. Survival was significantly higher in patients with resection compared to nailing, impending compared to actual fracture, solitary metastasis and impending fracture, actual fracture treated with resection, proximal femoral actual fracture and distal femoral impending fracture treated with resection. Conclusions Patients with femoral metastases have better survival when present with impending compared to actual pathological fracture. Although with a higher rate of complications, patients with pathological fractures of the proximal and distal femur may benefit from resection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-141
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Spontaneous Fractures
Survival Analysis
Thigh
Neoplasm Metastasis
Survival
Femoral Fractures
Femur
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • femoral metastases
  • nailing
  • resection
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Mavrogenis, A. F., Pala, E., Romagnoli, C., Romantini, M., Calabro, T., & Ruggieri, P. (2012). Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 105(2), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.22061

Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases. / Mavrogenis, Andreas F.; Pala, Elisa; Romagnoli, Carlo; Romantini, Matteo; Calabro, Teresa; Ruggieri, Pietro.

In: Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 105, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 135-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mavrogenis, AF, Pala, E, Romagnoli, C, Romantini, M, Calabro, T & Ruggieri, P 2012, 'Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases', Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.22061
Mavrogenis AF, Pala E, Romagnoli C, Romantini M, Calabro T, Ruggieri P. Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012 Feb;105(2):135-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.22061
Mavrogenis, Andreas F. ; Pala, Elisa ; Romagnoli, Carlo ; Romantini, Matteo ; Calabro, Teresa ; Ruggieri, Pietro. / Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases. In: Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 135-141.
@article{12a18f0410b94b4aa4657f4f5bf79208,
title = "Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases",
abstract = "Background Previous studies reported on surgical indications for patients with femoral metastases. However, few studies analyzed the spectrum of femoral metastatic presentation. We performed this study to evaluate the survival of patients with femoral metastases, and clarify the treatment of femoral impending and actual pathological fractures. Materials and Methods We retrospectively studied 110 patients with femoral metastases from various cancers treated with nailing or resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction from 1995 to 2010. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Survival was analyzed with respect to different metastatic presentations regarding gender, type of cancer, number, and location of femoral metastases, type of surgery, and pathological fracture. Results Univariate predictors of survival were the pathological fracture and type of surgery; multivariate predictor was only the pathological fracture. Survival was significantly higher in patients with resection compared to nailing, impending compared to actual fracture, solitary metastasis and impending fracture, actual fracture treated with resection, proximal femoral actual fracture and distal femoral impending fracture treated with resection. Conclusions Patients with femoral metastases have better survival when present with impending compared to actual pathological fracture. Although with a higher rate of complications, patients with pathological fractures of the proximal and distal femur may benefit from resection.",
keywords = "femoral metastases, nailing, resection, survival",
author = "Mavrogenis, {Andreas F.} and Elisa Pala and Carlo Romagnoli and Matteo Romantini and Teresa Calabro and Pietro Ruggieri",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/jso.22061",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "135--141",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases

AU - Mavrogenis, Andreas F.

AU - Pala, Elisa

AU - Romagnoli, Carlo

AU - Romantini, Matteo

AU - Calabro, Teresa

AU - Ruggieri, Pietro

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background Previous studies reported on surgical indications for patients with femoral metastases. However, few studies analyzed the spectrum of femoral metastatic presentation. We performed this study to evaluate the survival of patients with femoral metastases, and clarify the treatment of femoral impending and actual pathological fractures. Materials and Methods We retrospectively studied 110 patients with femoral metastases from various cancers treated with nailing or resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction from 1995 to 2010. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Survival was analyzed with respect to different metastatic presentations regarding gender, type of cancer, number, and location of femoral metastases, type of surgery, and pathological fracture. Results Univariate predictors of survival were the pathological fracture and type of surgery; multivariate predictor was only the pathological fracture. Survival was significantly higher in patients with resection compared to nailing, impending compared to actual fracture, solitary metastasis and impending fracture, actual fracture treated with resection, proximal femoral actual fracture and distal femoral impending fracture treated with resection. Conclusions Patients with femoral metastases have better survival when present with impending compared to actual pathological fracture. Although with a higher rate of complications, patients with pathological fractures of the proximal and distal femur may benefit from resection.

AB - Background Previous studies reported on surgical indications for patients with femoral metastases. However, few studies analyzed the spectrum of femoral metastatic presentation. We performed this study to evaluate the survival of patients with femoral metastases, and clarify the treatment of femoral impending and actual pathological fractures. Materials and Methods We retrospectively studied 110 patients with femoral metastases from various cancers treated with nailing or resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction from 1995 to 2010. The mean follow-up was 18 months. Survival was analyzed with respect to different metastatic presentations regarding gender, type of cancer, number, and location of femoral metastases, type of surgery, and pathological fracture. Results Univariate predictors of survival were the pathological fracture and type of surgery; multivariate predictor was only the pathological fracture. Survival was significantly higher in patients with resection compared to nailing, impending compared to actual fracture, solitary metastasis and impending fracture, actual fracture treated with resection, proximal femoral actual fracture and distal femoral impending fracture treated with resection. Conclusions Patients with femoral metastases have better survival when present with impending compared to actual pathological fracture. Although with a higher rate of complications, patients with pathological fractures of the proximal and distal femur may benefit from resection.

KW - femoral metastases

KW - nailing

KW - resection

KW - survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855352774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855352774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.22061

DO - 10.1002/jso.22061

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 135

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 2

ER -