Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis

Filippo Aucella, Mimmo Vigilante, Giuseppe Lucio Valente, Carmine Stallone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients on chronic hemodialysis are at high risk of HCV infection due to nosocomial transmission. The strict adhesion to universal precautions is the first step in prevention, but other simple tools such as systematic monitor disinfection and the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients need to be evaluated. Methods: A 5-year prospective study was carried out in 4 dialysis centers enrolling 135 patients. General precautions were adopted, but anti-HCV-positive patients were not isolated. In period A, lasting 24 months, monitor disinfection was performed after each dialysis session with sodium hypochlorite; peracetic acid was also used 3 times a week. In period B, lasting 36 months, 3 dialysis units (77 patients) prolonged the same preventive protocol of period A, while another unit (58 patients) also adopted the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive subjects. A third-generation ELISA anti-HCV test was performed every 2 months throughout the study. Results: Anti-HCV antibodies were initially detected in 43 patients (31.8%), prevalence rate ranging from 25 to 39.4%. One seroconversion occurred in period A, with an overall seroconversion rate of 0.54%/year. Also in period B one seroconversion occurred (unit 2), seroconversion rate of 0.36%/year. Therefore the mean seroconversion rate throughout the 5 years was 0.43%/year. Conclusion: Systematic monitor disinfection may be a simple and quite effective tool to avoid nosocomial transmission of HCV infection in the hemodialysis setting. In our opinion its use is mandatory. The use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients seems unnecessary. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-114
Number of pages5
JournalBlood Purification
Volume18
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Disinfection
Renal Dialysis
Dialysis
Universal Precautions
Peracetic Acid
Sodium Hypochlorite
Infectious Disease Transmission
Hepatitis C Antibodies
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Seroconversion
Prospective Studies
Infection

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis, separate machines
  • Hepatitis C virus
  • Monitor disinfection
  • Nosocomial transmission
  • Universal precautions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Hematology

Cite this

Aucella, F., Vigilante, M., Valente, G. L., & Stallone, C. (2000). Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis. Blood Purification, 18(2), 110-114.

Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis. / Aucella, Filippo; Vigilante, Mimmo; Valente, Giuseppe Lucio; Stallone, Carmine.

In: Blood Purification, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2000, p. 110-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aucella, F, Vigilante, M, Valente, GL & Stallone, C 2000, 'Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis', Blood Purification, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 110-114.
Aucella, Filippo ; Vigilante, Mimmo ; Valente, Giuseppe Lucio ; Stallone, Carmine. / Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis. In: Blood Purification. 2000 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 110-114.
@article{14a8707c967846138b081eb369b475a1,
title = "Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis",
abstract = "Background: Patients on chronic hemodialysis are at high risk of HCV infection due to nosocomial transmission. The strict adhesion to universal precautions is the first step in prevention, but other simple tools such as systematic monitor disinfection and the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients need to be evaluated. Methods: A 5-year prospective study was carried out in 4 dialysis centers enrolling 135 patients. General precautions were adopted, but anti-HCV-positive patients were not isolated. In period A, lasting 24 months, monitor disinfection was performed after each dialysis session with sodium hypochlorite; peracetic acid was also used 3 times a week. In period B, lasting 36 months, 3 dialysis units (77 patients) prolonged the same preventive protocol of period A, while another unit (58 patients) also adopted the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive subjects. A third-generation ELISA anti-HCV test was performed every 2 months throughout the study. Results: Anti-HCV antibodies were initially detected in 43 patients (31.8{\%}), prevalence rate ranging from 25 to 39.4{\%}. One seroconversion occurred in period A, with an overall seroconversion rate of 0.54{\%}/year. Also in period B one seroconversion occurred (unit 2), seroconversion rate of 0.36{\%}/year. Therefore the mean seroconversion rate throughout the 5 years was 0.43{\%}/year. Conclusion: Systematic monitor disinfection may be a simple and quite effective tool to avoid nosocomial transmission of HCV infection in the hemodialysis setting. In our opinion its use is mandatory. The use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients seems unnecessary. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
keywords = "Hemodialysis, separate machines, Hepatitis C virus, Monitor disinfection, Nosocomial transmission, Universal precautions",
author = "Filippo Aucella and Mimmo Vigilante and Valente, {Giuseppe Lucio} and Carmine Stallone",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "110--114",
journal = "Blood Purification",
issn = "0253-5068",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic monitor disinfection is effective in limiting HCV spread in hemodialysis

AU - Aucella, Filippo

AU - Vigilante, Mimmo

AU - Valente, Giuseppe Lucio

AU - Stallone, Carmine

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: Patients on chronic hemodialysis are at high risk of HCV infection due to nosocomial transmission. The strict adhesion to universal precautions is the first step in prevention, but other simple tools such as systematic monitor disinfection and the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients need to be evaluated. Methods: A 5-year prospective study was carried out in 4 dialysis centers enrolling 135 patients. General precautions were adopted, but anti-HCV-positive patients were not isolated. In period A, lasting 24 months, monitor disinfection was performed after each dialysis session with sodium hypochlorite; peracetic acid was also used 3 times a week. In period B, lasting 36 months, 3 dialysis units (77 patients) prolonged the same preventive protocol of period A, while another unit (58 patients) also adopted the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive subjects. A third-generation ELISA anti-HCV test was performed every 2 months throughout the study. Results: Anti-HCV antibodies were initially detected in 43 patients (31.8%), prevalence rate ranging from 25 to 39.4%. One seroconversion occurred in period A, with an overall seroconversion rate of 0.54%/year. Also in period B one seroconversion occurred (unit 2), seroconversion rate of 0.36%/year. Therefore the mean seroconversion rate throughout the 5 years was 0.43%/year. Conclusion: Systematic monitor disinfection may be a simple and quite effective tool to avoid nosocomial transmission of HCV infection in the hemodialysis setting. In our opinion its use is mandatory. The use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients seems unnecessary. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

AB - Background: Patients on chronic hemodialysis are at high risk of HCV infection due to nosocomial transmission. The strict adhesion to universal precautions is the first step in prevention, but other simple tools such as systematic monitor disinfection and the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients need to be evaluated. Methods: A 5-year prospective study was carried out in 4 dialysis centers enrolling 135 patients. General precautions were adopted, but anti-HCV-positive patients were not isolated. In period A, lasting 24 months, monitor disinfection was performed after each dialysis session with sodium hypochlorite; peracetic acid was also used 3 times a week. In period B, lasting 36 months, 3 dialysis units (77 patients) prolonged the same preventive protocol of period A, while another unit (58 patients) also adopted the use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive subjects. A third-generation ELISA anti-HCV test was performed every 2 months throughout the study. Results: Anti-HCV antibodies were initially detected in 43 patients (31.8%), prevalence rate ranging from 25 to 39.4%. One seroconversion occurred in period A, with an overall seroconversion rate of 0.54%/year. Also in period B one seroconversion occurred (unit 2), seroconversion rate of 0.36%/year. Therefore the mean seroconversion rate throughout the 5 years was 0.43%/year. Conclusion: Systematic monitor disinfection may be a simple and quite effective tool to avoid nosocomial transmission of HCV infection in the hemodialysis setting. In our opinion its use is mandatory. The use of separate machines for anti-HCV-positive patients seems unnecessary. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.

KW - Hemodialysis, separate machines

KW - Hepatitis C virus

KW - Monitor disinfection

KW - Nosocomial transmission

KW - Universal precautions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033853537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033853537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 110

EP - 114

JO - Blood Purification

JF - Blood Purification

SN - 0253-5068

IS - 2

ER -