TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Individuals With Amputation
T2 - Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation
AU - Heyns, Arne
AU - Jacobs, Sofie
AU - Negrini, Stefano
AU - Patrini, Michele
AU - Rauch, Alexandra
AU - Kiekens, Carlotte
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank An De Groef, PhD, for the data management concerning the systematic review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: To report the results of the systematic search performed to identify interventions and related evidence for rehabilitation of individuals with amputation based on the current evidence from clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Data Sources: Pubmed, Pedro, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, and multiple guideline databases (date restriction, 2008-2018). Study Selection: Exclusion criteria were no CPG, not reporting on rehabilitation, published before 2008, developed for health conditions other than amputation, presence of conflict of interest (financial or nonfinancial), lack of information on the strength of the recommendation, and lack of quality assessed by the “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation.” Data Extraction: Data extraction was done using a standardized form, which comprised information on the recommendation, the strength of recommendation and the quality of the evidence used to inform the recommendation. Data Synthesis: We included 4 guidelines, providing a total of 217 recommendations (20 on assessments, 131 on interventions, and 66 on service provision). Most recommendations concerned pain management, education, pre- and postoperative management, and residual limb care. The strength of recommendation was generally weak to intermediate. The level of evidence mostly compromised expert opinions, with only 6.9% (15 of 217) being provided by randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses. Conclusions: The field of amputation is well covered for recommended interventions, but the level of evidence is generally low and is based mostly on expert opinion. Some important domains are not covered (eg, vocation and education, sexual and/or intimate relationships, activities of daily living or leisure activities, education concerning socket/liner fitting). There is also a lack of description of the contents of training and rehabilitation programs. This should be taken into account for the development of future guidelines.
AB - Objectives: To report the results of the systematic search performed to identify interventions and related evidence for rehabilitation of individuals with amputation based on the current evidence from clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Data Sources: Pubmed, Pedro, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, and multiple guideline databases (date restriction, 2008-2018). Study Selection: Exclusion criteria were no CPG, not reporting on rehabilitation, published before 2008, developed for health conditions other than amputation, presence of conflict of interest (financial or nonfinancial), lack of information on the strength of the recommendation, and lack of quality assessed by the “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation.” Data Extraction: Data extraction was done using a standardized form, which comprised information on the recommendation, the strength of recommendation and the quality of the evidence used to inform the recommendation. Data Synthesis: We included 4 guidelines, providing a total of 217 recommendations (20 on assessments, 131 on interventions, and 66 on service provision). Most recommendations concerned pain management, education, pre- and postoperative management, and residual limb care. The strength of recommendation was generally weak to intermediate. The level of evidence mostly compromised expert opinions, with only 6.9% (15 of 217) being provided by randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses. Conclusions: The field of amputation is well covered for recommended interventions, but the level of evidence is generally low and is based mostly on expert opinion. Some important domains are not covered (eg, vocation and education, sexual and/or intimate relationships, activities of daily living or leisure activities, education concerning socket/liner fitting). There is also a lack of description of the contents of training and rehabilitation programs. This should be taken into account for the development of future guidelines.
KW - Amputation
KW - Guideline
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100097620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100097620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.019
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.019
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85100097620
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
SN - 0003-9993
ER -