Systematic versus on-demand early palliative care: A randomised clinical trial assessing quality of care and treatment aggressiveness near the end of life

Marco Cesare Maltoni, Emanuela Scarpi, Monia Dall'Agata, S. Schiavon, Claudia Biasini, Carla Codecà, Chiara Maria Giovann Broglia, E. Sansoni, Roberto Bortolussi, Ferdinando Garetto, Luisa Fioretto, M. T. Cattaneo, Alice Giacobino, Massimo Luzzani, Giovanna Luchena, Sara Alquati, S. Quadrini, Vittorina Zagonel, Luigi Cavanna, Daris FerrariPaolo Pedrazzoli, Giovanni Luca Paolo Frassineti, A. Galiano, Andrea Casadei Gardini, Manlio Monti, Oriana Nanni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim Early palliative care (EPC) in oncology has shown sparse evidence of a positive impact on patient outcomes, quality of care outcomes and costs. Patients and methods Data for this secondary analysis were taken from a trial of 207 outpatients with metastatic pancreatic cancer randomly assigned to receive standard cancer care plus on-demand EPC (standard arm) or standard cancer care plus systematic EPC (interventional arm). After 20 months’ follow-up, 149 (80%) had died. Outcome measures were frequency, type and timing of chemotherapy administration, use of resources, place of death and overall survival. Results Some indices of end-of-life (EoL) aggressiveness had a favourable impact from systematic EPC. Interventional arm patients showed higher use of hospice services: a significantly longer median and mean period of hospice care (P = 0.025 for both indexes) and a significantly higher median and mean number of hospice admissions (both P < 0.010). In the experimental arm, chemotherapy was performed in the last 30 days of life in a significantly inferior rate with respect to control arm: 18.7% versus 27.8% (adjusted P = 0.036). Other non-significant differences were seen in favour of experimental arm. Conclusions Systematic EPC showed a significant impact on some indicators of EoL treatment aggressiveness. These data, reinforced by multiple non-significant differences in most of the other items, suggest that quality of care is improved by this approach. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01996540).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-118
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Care aggressiveness near the end of life
  • Early palliative care
  • Use of health care services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Maltoni, M. C., Scarpi, E., Dall'Agata, M., Schiavon, S., Biasini, C., Codecà, C., Broglia, C. M. G., Sansoni, E., Bortolussi, R., Garetto, F., Fioretto, L., Cattaneo, M. T., Giacobino, A., Luzzani, M., Luchena, G., Alquati, S., Quadrini, S., Zagonel, V., Cavanna, L., ... Nanni, O. (2016). Systematic versus on-demand early palliative care: A randomised clinical trial assessing quality of care and treatment aggressiveness near the end of life. European Journal of Cancer, 69, 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.004