T cell responses to tumor: how dominant assumptions on immune activity led to a neglect of pathological functions, and how evolutionary considerations can help identify testable hypotheses for improving immunotherapy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is based on the premise that activated, pro-inflammatory T cell responses to tumor will mostly combat tumor growth. Nowadays accepted as largely valid, this hypothesis has been formed as a result of extensive theoretical and experimental argumentation on the inherent function of the immune system and the nature of the immunological self, dating back to the foundations of immunology. These arguments have also been affected by how current working hypotheses were set by researchers, an issue that has been the focus of study by medical anthropologists. As a result of these processes, cancer immunotherapy has developed into a truly promising anti-cancer strategy, with very substantial benefits in clinical outcomes. However, as immunotherapy still has large margins for improvement, a more thorough examination of both the historical background and evolutionary context of current assumptions for how the immune system responds to cancer can help reveal novel, testable questions. We describe how attempting to answer some of these questions experimentally, such as identifying the contributors of tumor-associated fibrosis, has led to potentially useful insights on how to improve immunotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-998
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Volume67
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Immunotherapy
T-Lymphocytes
Neoplasms
Immune System
Allergy and Immunology
Fibrosis
Research Personnel
Growth

Keywords

  • Immunological self
  • Immunotherapy
  • NIBIT 2016
  • T cells
  • Tumor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

@article{d55923aeaa5b46e0b543e07d63df43d8,
title = "T cell responses to tumor: how dominant assumptions on immune activity led to a neglect of pathological functions, and how evolutionary considerations can help identify testable hypotheses for improving immunotherapy",
abstract = "Cancer immunotherapy is based on the premise that activated, pro-inflammatory T cell responses to tumor will mostly combat tumor growth. Nowadays accepted as largely valid, this hypothesis has been formed as a result of extensive theoretical and experimental argumentation on the inherent function of the immune system and the nature of the immunological self, dating back to the foundations of immunology. These arguments have also been affected by how current working hypotheses were set by researchers, an issue that has been the focus of study by medical anthropologists. As a result of these processes, cancer immunotherapy has developed into a truly promising anti-cancer strategy, with very substantial benefits in clinical outcomes. However, as immunotherapy still has large margins for improvement, a more thorough examination of both the historical background and evolutionary context of current assumptions for how the immune system responds to cancer can help reveal novel, testable questions. We describe how attempting to answer some of these questions experimentally, such as identifying the contributors of tumor-associated fibrosis, has led to potentially useful insights on how to improve immunotherapy.",
keywords = "Immunological self, Immunotherapy, NIBIT 2016, T cells, Tumor",
author = "Marinos Kallikourdis",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00262-017-2113-9",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "989--998",
journal = "Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy",
issn = "0340-7004",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - T cell responses to tumor

T2 - how dominant assumptions on immune activity led to a neglect of pathological functions, and how evolutionary considerations can help identify testable hypotheses for improving immunotherapy

AU - Kallikourdis, Marinos

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Cancer immunotherapy is based on the premise that activated, pro-inflammatory T cell responses to tumor will mostly combat tumor growth. Nowadays accepted as largely valid, this hypothesis has been formed as a result of extensive theoretical and experimental argumentation on the inherent function of the immune system and the nature of the immunological self, dating back to the foundations of immunology. These arguments have also been affected by how current working hypotheses were set by researchers, an issue that has been the focus of study by medical anthropologists. As a result of these processes, cancer immunotherapy has developed into a truly promising anti-cancer strategy, with very substantial benefits in clinical outcomes. However, as immunotherapy still has large margins for improvement, a more thorough examination of both the historical background and evolutionary context of current assumptions for how the immune system responds to cancer can help reveal novel, testable questions. We describe how attempting to answer some of these questions experimentally, such as identifying the contributors of tumor-associated fibrosis, has led to potentially useful insights on how to improve immunotherapy.

AB - Cancer immunotherapy is based on the premise that activated, pro-inflammatory T cell responses to tumor will mostly combat tumor growth. Nowadays accepted as largely valid, this hypothesis has been formed as a result of extensive theoretical and experimental argumentation on the inherent function of the immune system and the nature of the immunological self, dating back to the foundations of immunology. These arguments have also been affected by how current working hypotheses were set by researchers, an issue that has been the focus of study by medical anthropologists. As a result of these processes, cancer immunotherapy has developed into a truly promising anti-cancer strategy, with very substantial benefits in clinical outcomes. However, as immunotherapy still has large margins for improvement, a more thorough examination of both the historical background and evolutionary context of current assumptions for how the immune system responds to cancer can help reveal novel, testable questions. We describe how attempting to answer some of these questions experimentally, such as identifying the contributors of tumor-associated fibrosis, has led to potentially useful insights on how to improve immunotherapy.

KW - Immunological self

KW - Immunotherapy

KW - NIBIT 2016

KW - T cells

KW - Tumor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041289915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041289915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00262-017-2113-9

DO - 10.1007/s00262-017-2113-9

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29335855

AN - SCOPUS:85041289915

VL - 67

SP - 989

EP - 998

JO - Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy

JF - Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy

SN - 0340-7004

IS - 6

ER -