Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rehabilitation robots have built-in technology and sensors that allow accurate measurement of movement kinematics and kinetics, which can be used to derive measures related to upper limb performance and highlight changes in motor behavior due to rehabilitation. This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of some robot-measured parameters by analyzing their intra-session and inter-session (day-by-day) variability. The study was carried out in two groups: 31 patients after stroke and 15 healthy subjects. Both groups practiced two different motor tasks consisting of point-to-point reaching movements in the shape of two geometrical figures that were selected for the assessment of global and directional (eight directions of the workspace) test-retest reliability. The reliability of six parameters measuring movement velocity, accuracy, efficiency and smoothness was assessed intra-session and inter-session by the ICC, SEM, and CV. Healthy subjects exhibited very high ICC values (> 0.85) and low SEM for all parameters. Patients had high ICC values and low SEM but their global reliability was generally lower compared to healthy subjects. In addition, their inter-session reliability showed very high ICC values (> 0.91) and low SEM for all parameters. Direction analysis showed that in some parameters the reliability was generally high but not homogeneous in all directions. In addition, some directions showed systematic error. This study demonstrates that robot-measured parameters are reliable and can be considered ideal candidates for use in combination with impairment and functional clinical scales to evaluate motor improvement during robot-assisted neurorehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6746124
Pages (from-to)1020-1029
Number of pages10
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Robotics
Reproducibility of Results
Upper Extremity
Recovery
Healthy Volunteers
Robots
Scanning electron microscopy
Rehabilitation
Patient rehabilitation
Biomechanical Phenomena
Systematic errors
Stroke
Technology
Direction compound
Kinematics
Kinetics
Sensors

Keywords

  • Motor assessment
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Reliability
  • Robot measures
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{e2c2064ada3140f1a540692b1d18c291,
title = "Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery",
abstract = "Rehabilitation robots have built-in technology and sensors that allow accurate measurement of movement kinematics and kinetics, which can be used to derive measures related to upper limb performance and highlight changes in motor behavior due to rehabilitation. This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of some robot-measured parameters by analyzing their intra-session and inter-session (day-by-day) variability. The study was carried out in two groups: 31 patients after stroke and 15 healthy subjects. Both groups practiced two different motor tasks consisting of point-to-point reaching movements in the shape of two geometrical figures that were selected for the assessment of global and directional (eight directions of the workspace) test-retest reliability. The reliability of six parameters measuring movement velocity, accuracy, efficiency and smoothness was assessed intra-session and inter-session by the ICC, SEM, and CV. Healthy subjects exhibited very high ICC values (> 0.85) and low SEM for all parameters. Patients had high ICC values and low SEM but their global reliability was generally lower compared to healthy subjects. In addition, their inter-session reliability showed very high ICC values (> 0.91) and low SEM for all parameters. Direction analysis showed that in some parameters the reliability was generally high but not homogeneous in all directions. In addition, some directions showed systematic error. This study demonstrates that robot-measured parameters are reliable and can be considered ideal candidates for use in combination with impairment and functional clinical scales to evaluate motor improvement during robot-assisted neurorehabilitation.",
keywords = "Motor assessment, Neurorehabilitation, Reliability, Robot measures, Stroke",
author = "Roberto Colombo and Ivana Cusmano and Irma Sterpi and Alessandra Mazzone and Carmen Delconte and Fabrizio Pisano",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2306571",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1020--1029",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering",
issn = "1534-4320",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery

AU - Colombo, Roberto

AU - Cusmano, Ivana

AU - Sterpi, Irma

AU - Mazzone, Alessandra

AU - Delconte, Carmen

AU - Pisano, Fabrizio

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Rehabilitation robots have built-in technology and sensors that allow accurate measurement of movement kinematics and kinetics, which can be used to derive measures related to upper limb performance and highlight changes in motor behavior due to rehabilitation. This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of some robot-measured parameters by analyzing their intra-session and inter-session (day-by-day) variability. The study was carried out in two groups: 31 patients after stroke and 15 healthy subjects. Both groups practiced two different motor tasks consisting of point-to-point reaching movements in the shape of two geometrical figures that were selected for the assessment of global and directional (eight directions of the workspace) test-retest reliability. The reliability of six parameters measuring movement velocity, accuracy, efficiency and smoothness was assessed intra-session and inter-session by the ICC, SEM, and CV. Healthy subjects exhibited very high ICC values (> 0.85) and low SEM for all parameters. Patients had high ICC values and low SEM but their global reliability was generally lower compared to healthy subjects. In addition, their inter-session reliability showed very high ICC values (> 0.91) and low SEM for all parameters. Direction analysis showed that in some parameters the reliability was generally high but not homogeneous in all directions. In addition, some directions showed systematic error. This study demonstrates that robot-measured parameters are reliable and can be considered ideal candidates for use in combination with impairment and functional clinical scales to evaluate motor improvement during robot-assisted neurorehabilitation.

AB - Rehabilitation robots have built-in technology and sensors that allow accurate measurement of movement kinematics and kinetics, which can be used to derive measures related to upper limb performance and highlight changes in motor behavior due to rehabilitation. This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of some robot-measured parameters by analyzing their intra-session and inter-session (day-by-day) variability. The study was carried out in two groups: 31 patients after stroke and 15 healthy subjects. Both groups practiced two different motor tasks consisting of point-to-point reaching movements in the shape of two geometrical figures that were selected for the assessment of global and directional (eight directions of the workspace) test-retest reliability. The reliability of six parameters measuring movement velocity, accuracy, efficiency and smoothness was assessed intra-session and inter-session by the ICC, SEM, and CV. Healthy subjects exhibited very high ICC values (> 0.85) and low SEM for all parameters. Patients had high ICC values and low SEM but their global reliability was generally lower compared to healthy subjects. In addition, their inter-session reliability showed very high ICC values (> 0.91) and low SEM for all parameters. Direction analysis showed that in some parameters the reliability was generally high but not homogeneous in all directions. In addition, some directions showed systematic error. This study demonstrates that robot-measured parameters are reliable and can be considered ideal candidates for use in combination with impairment and functional clinical scales to evaluate motor improvement during robot-assisted neurorehabilitation.

KW - Motor assessment

KW - Neurorehabilitation

KW - Reliability

KW - Robot measures

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923377793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923377793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2306571

DO - 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2306571

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1020

EP - 1029

JO - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

JF - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

SN - 1534-4320

IS - 5

M1 - 6746124

ER -