TY - JOUR
T1 - The ABC of tDCS
T2 - Effects of anodal, bilateral and cathodal montages of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with stroke - A pilot study
AU - Fusco, A.
AU - De Angelis, D.
AU - Morone, G.
AU - Maglione, L.
AU - Paolucci, T.
AU - Bragoni, M.
AU - Venturiero, V.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that is emerging as a prospective therapy for different neurologic disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal and cathodal stimulation can improve motor performance in terms of dexterity and manual force. The objective of this study was to determine whether different electrodes' setups (anodal, cathodal, and simultaneous bilateral tDCS) provide different motor performance and which montage was more effective. As secondary outcome, we have asked to the patients about their satisfaction, and to determine if the bilateral tDCS was more uncomfortable than unilateral tDCS. Nine patients with stroke in subacute phase were enrolled in this study and randomly divided in three groups. Our results showed that tDCS was an effective treatment if compared to Sham stimulation (P=0.022). In particular, anodal stimulation provided the higher improvement in terms of manual dexterity. Cathodal stimulation seemed to have a little effect in terms of force improvement, not observed with other setups. Bipolar stimulation seemed to be the less effective. No significant differences have been noted for the different set-ups for patients' judgment. These results highlight the potential efficacy of tDCS for patients with stroke in subacute phase.
AB - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that is emerging as a prospective therapy for different neurologic disorders. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal and cathodal stimulation can improve motor performance in terms of dexterity and manual force. The objective of this study was to determine whether different electrodes' setups (anodal, cathodal, and simultaneous bilateral tDCS) provide different motor performance and which montage was more effective. As secondary outcome, we have asked to the patients about their satisfaction, and to determine if the bilateral tDCS was more uncomfortable than unilateral tDCS. Nine patients with stroke in subacute phase were enrolled in this study and randomly divided in three groups. Our results showed that tDCS was an effective treatment if compared to Sham stimulation (P=0.022). In particular, anodal stimulation provided the higher improvement in terms of manual dexterity. Cathodal stimulation seemed to have a little effect in terms of force improvement, not observed with other setups. Bipolar stimulation seemed to be the less effective. No significant differences have been noted for the different set-ups for patients' judgment. These results highlight the potential efficacy of tDCS for patients with stroke in subacute phase.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873337005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873337005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2013/837595
DO - 10.1155/2013/837595
M3 - Article
C2 - 23365790
AN - SCOPUS:84873337005
JO - Stroke Research and Treatment
JF - Stroke Research and Treatment
SN - 2090-8105
M1 - 837595
ER -