The CBCL 1.5-5 and the identification of preschoolers with autism in Italy

F. Muratori, A. Narzisi, R. Tancredi, A. Cosenza, S. Calugi, I. Saviozzi, E. Santocchi, S. Calderoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims. To study the potential use of child behaviour checklist (CBCL) 1.5-5 scales for the early identification of preschoolers at risk of autism. Methods. CBCL scores of three groups of preschoolers were compared: (1) an experimental group of 101 preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); (2) a control group of 95 preschoolers with other psychiatric disorders (OPD); (3) a control group of 117 preschoolers with typical development (TD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results. ANOVA revealed that ASD and OPD had significantly higher scores in almost all CBCL scales than TD. ASD presented significantly higher scores than OPD on Withdrawn, Attention Problems and Pervasive Developmental Problems (PDP) scales. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that these same CBCL scales have validity in predicting the presence of an ASD towards both TD and OPD. ROC analysis indicated high sensitivity and specificity for PDP (0.85 and 0.90) and Withdrawn (0.89 and 0.92) scales when ASD is compared to TD. Specificity (0.60 for PDP and 0.65 for Withdrawn) decreases when comparing ASD and OPDConclusions. The PDP and Withdrawn scales have a good predictive validity so that they could be proposed as a first-level tool to identify preschoolers at risk of autism in primary care settings. Problems regarding the lower specificity when comparing ASD v. OPD are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-338
Number of pages10
JournalEpidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Child Behavior
Autistic Disorder
Checklist
Italy
Psychiatry
ROC Curve
Analysis of Variance
Logistic Models
Control Groups
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Primary Health Care
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Autistic disorder
  • behaviour
  • early diagnosis
  • questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

The CBCL 1.5-5 and the identification of preschoolers with autism in Italy. / Muratori, F.; Narzisi, A.; Tancredi, R.; Cosenza, A.; Calugi, S.; Saviozzi, I.; Santocchi, E.; Calderoni, S.

In: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 329-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca5a6106499c4df6bc2afcfe4b2c2c6e,
title = "The CBCL 1.5-5 and the identification of preschoolers with autism in Italy",
abstract = "Aims. To study the potential use of child behaviour checklist (CBCL) 1.5-5 scales for the early identification of preschoolers at risk of autism. Methods. CBCL scores of three groups of preschoolers were compared: (1) an experimental group of 101 preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); (2) a control group of 95 preschoolers with other psychiatric disorders (OPD); (3) a control group of 117 preschoolers with typical development (TD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results. ANOVA revealed that ASD and OPD had significantly higher scores in almost all CBCL scales than TD. ASD presented significantly higher scores than OPD on Withdrawn, Attention Problems and Pervasive Developmental Problems (PDP) scales. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that these same CBCL scales have validity in predicting the presence of an ASD towards both TD and OPD. ROC analysis indicated high sensitivity and specificity for PDP (0.85 and 0.90) and Withdrawn (0.89 and 0.92) scales when ASD is compared to TD. Specificity (0.60 for PDP and 0.65 for Withdrawn) decreases when comparing ASD and OPDConclusions. The PDP and Withdrawn scales have a good predictive validity so that they could be proposed as a first-level tool to identify preschoolers at risk of autism in primary care settings. Problems regarding the lower specificity when comparing ASD v. OPD are discussed.",
keywords = "Autistic disorder, behaviour, early diagnosis, questionnaires",
author = "F. Muratori and A. Narzisi and R. Tancredi and A. Cosenza and S. Calugi and I. Saviozzi and E. Santocchi and S. Calderoni",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1017/S204579601100045X",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "329--338",
journal = "Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences",
issn = "2045-7960",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The CBCL 1.5-5 and the identification of preschoolers with autism in Italy

AU - Muratori, F.

AU - Narzisi, A.

AU - Tancredi, R.

AU - Cosenza, A.

AU - Calugi, S.

AU - Saviozzi, I.

AU - Santocchi, E.

AU - Calderoni, S.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Aims. To study the potential use of child behaviour checklist (CBCL) 1.5-5 scales for the early identification of preschoolers at risk of autism. Methods. CBCL scores of three groups of preschoolers were compared: (1) an experimental group of 101 preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); (2) a control group of 95 preschoolers with other psychiatric disorders (OPD); (3) a control group of 117 preschoolers with typical development (TD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results. ANOVA revealed that ASD and OPD had significantly higher scores in almost all CBCL scales than TD. ASD presented significantly higher scores than OPD on Withdrawn, Attention Problems and Pervasive Developmental Problems (PDP) scales. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that these same CBCL scales have validity in predicting the presence of an ASD towards both TD and OPD. ROC analysis indicated high sensitivity and specificity for PDP (0.85 and 0.90) and Withdrawn (0.89 and 0.92) scales when ASD is compared to TD. Specificity (0.60 for PDP and 0.65 for Withdrawn) decreases when comparing ASD and OPDConclusions. The PDP and Withdrawn scales have a good predictive validity so that they could be proposed as a first-level tool to identify preschoolers at risk of autism in primary care settings. Problems regarding the lower specificity when comparing ASD v. OPD are discussed.

AB - Aims. To study the potential use of child behaviour checklist (CBCL) 1.5-5 scales for the early identification of preschoolers at risk of autism. Methods. CBCL scores of three groups of preschoolers were compared: (1) an experimental group of 101 preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD); (2) a control group of 95 preschoolers with other psychiatric disorders (OPD); (3) a control group of 117 preschoolers with typical development (TD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results. ANOVA revealed that ASD and OPD had significantly higher scores in almost all CBCL scales than TD. ASD presented significantly higher scores than OPD on Withdrawn, Attention Problems and Pervasive Developmental Problems (PDP) scales. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that these same CBCL scales have validity in predicting the presence of an ASD towards both TD and OPD. ROC analysis indicated high sensitivity and specificity for PDP (0.85 and 0.90) and Withdrawn (0.89 and 0.92) scales when ASD is compared to TD. Specificity (0.60 for PDP and 0.65 for Withdrawn) decreases when comparing ASD and OPDConclusions. The PDP and Withdrawn scales have a good predictive validity so that they could be proposed as a first-level tool to identify preschoolers at risk of autism in primary care settings. Problems regarding the lower specificity when comparing ASD v. OPD are discussed.

KW - Autistic disorder

KW - behaviour

KW - early diagnosis

KW - questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80155213566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80155213566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S204579601100045X

DO - 10.1017/S204579601100045X

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 329

EP - 338

JO - Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

JF - Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

SN - 2045-7960

IS - 4

ER -