The Comparison of Performance Between Thoracic Surgical Units

Alessandro Brunelli, Gaetano Rocco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Managed care systems demand an increased effort in quality monitoring through the use of reliable instruments of performance evaluation. Comparison between units requires the definition and selection of proper indicators of quality. Outcome indicators are widely used in our practice but they need to be risk adjusted to prevent misleading information and unethical risk-averse behaviors. Regression analyses are commonly used for developing risk models. Bootstrap analysis can formalize the development of model building, removing much of the human biases associated with regression analysis and introducing a concrete measure of reliability of the risk factors. Recently published examples of comparisons of performance between different thoracic surgery units are summarized with the intent to provide a methodological template for future comparative audit investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-424
Number of pages12
JournalThoracic Surgery Clinics
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Thorax
Regression Analysis
Managed Care Programs
Thoracic Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

The Comparison of Performance Between Thoracic Surgical Units. / Brunelli, Alessandro; Rocco, Gaetano.

In: Thoracic Surgery Clinics, Vol. 17, No. 3, 08.2007, p. 413-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{809426157dd44cae991a8a0da976d0a2,
title = "The Comparison of Performance Between Thoracic Surgical Units",
abstract = "Managed care systems demand an increased effort in quality monitoring through the use of reliable instruments of performance evaluation. Comparison between units requires the definition and selection of proper indicators of quality. Outcome indicators are widely used in our practice but they need to be risk adjusted to prevent misleading information and unethical risk-averse behaviors. Regression analyses are commonly used for developing risk models. Bootstrap analysis can formalize the development of model building, removing much of the human biases associated with regression analysis and introducing a concrete measure of reliability of the risk factors. Recently published examples of comparisons of performance between different thoracic surgery units are summarized with the intent to provide a methodological template for future comparative audit investigations.",
author = "Alessandro Brunelli and Gaetano Rocco",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.07.006",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "413--424",
journal = "Thoracic Surgery Clinics",
issn = "1547-4127",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Comparison of Performance Between Thoracic Surgical Units

AU - Brunelli, Alessandro

AU - Rocco, Gaetano

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Managed care systems demand an increased effort in quality monitoring through the use of reliable instruments of performance evaluation. Comparison between units requires the definition and selection of proper indicators of quality. Outcome indicators are widely used in our practice but they need to be risk adjusted to prevent misleading information and unethical risk-averse behaviors. Regression analyses are commonly used for developing risk models. Bootstrap analysis can formalize the development of model building, removing much of the human biases associated with regression analysis and introducing a concrete measure of reliability of the risk factors. Recently published examples of comparisons of performance between different thoracic surgery units are summarized with the intent to provide a methodological template for future comparative audit investigations.

AB - Managed care systems demand an increased effort in quality monitoring through the use of reliable instruments of performance evaluation. Comparison between units requires the definition and selection of proper indicators of quality. Outcome indicators are widely used in our practice but they need to be risk adjusted to prevent misleading information and unethical risk-averse behaviors. Regression analyses are commonly used for developing risk models. Bootstrap analysis can formalize the development of model building, removing much of the human biases associated with regression analysis and introducing a concrete measure of reliability of the risk factors. Recently published examples of comparisons of performance between different thoracic surgery units are summarized with the intent to provide a methodological template for future comparative audit investigations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448965505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448965505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.07.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 18072363

AN - SCOPUS:35448965505

VL - 17

SP - 413

EP - 424

JO - Thoracic Surgery Clinics

JF - Thoracic Surgery Clinics

SN - 1547-4127

IS - 3

ER -