The contribution of surgical brain mapping to the understanding of the anatomo-functional basis of syntax

A critical review

Elia Zanin, Marco Riva, Valentina Bambini, Stefano F. Cappa, Lorenzo Magrassi, Andrea Moro

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A wide range of studies on language assessment during awake brain surgery is nowadays available. Yet, a consensus on a standardized protocol for intraoperative language mapping is still lacking. More specifically, very limited information is offered about intraoperative assessment of a crucial component of language such as syntax. This review aims at critically analyzing the intraoperative studies investigating the cerebral basis of syntactic processing. A comprehensive query was performed on the literature, returning a total of 18 studies. These papers were analyzed according to two complementary criteria, based on the distinction between morphosyntax and syntax. The first criterion focused on the tasks and stimuli employed intraoperatively. Studies were divided into three different groups: group 1 included those studies that overtly aimed at investigating morphosyntactic processes; group 2 included studies that did not explicitly focus on syntax, yet employed stimuli requiring morphosyntactic processing; and group 3 included studies reporting some generic form of syntactic deficit, although not further investigated. The second criterion focused on the syntactic structures of the sentences assessed intraoperatively, analyzing the canonicity of sentence structure (i.e., canonical versus non-canonical word order). The global picture emerging from our analysis indicates that what was investigated in the intraoperative literature is morphosyntactic processing, rather than pure syntax. The study of the neurobiology of syntax during awake surgery seems thus to be still at an early stage, in need of systematic, linguistically grounded investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1579-1589
Number of pages11
JournalNeurological Sciences
Volume38
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Brain Mapping
Language
Neurobiology
Consensus
Brain

Keywords

  • Awake brain surgery
  • DES
  • ECoG
  • Language
  • Morphosyntax
  • Syntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The contribution of surgical brain mapping to the understanding of the anatomo-functional basis of syntax : A critical review. / Zanin, Elia; Riva, Marco; Bambini, Valentina; Cappa, Stefano F.; Magrassi, Lorenzo; Moro, Andrea.

In: Neurological Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 1579-1589.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Zanin, Elia ; Riva, Marco ; Bambini, Valentina ; Cappa, Stefano F. ; Magrassi, Lorenzo ; Moro, Andrea. / The contribution of surgical brain mapping to the understanding of the anatomo-functional basis of syntax : A critical review. In: Neurological Sciences. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 9. pp. 1579-1589.
@article{19c30d836b8f40ca90562ad43f4639b1,
title = "The contribution of surgical brain mapping to the understanding of the anatomo-functional basis of syntax: A critical review",
abstract = "A wide range of studies on language assessment during awake brain surgery is nowadays available. Yet, a consensus on a standardized protocol for intraoperative language mapping is still lacking. More specifically, very limited information is offered about intraoperative assessment of a crucial component of language such as syntax. This review aims at critically analyzing the intraoperative studies investigating the cerebral basis of syntactic processing. A comprehensive query was performed on the literature, returning a total of 18 studies. These papers were analyzed according to two complementary criteria, based on the distinction between morphosyntax and syntax. The first criterion focused on the tasks and stimuli employed intraoperatively. Studies were divided into three different groups: group 1 included those studies that overtly aimed at investigating morphosyntactic processes; group 2 included studies that did not explicitly focus on syntax, yet employed stimuli requiring morphosyntactic processing; and group 3 included studies reporting some generic form of syntactic deficit, although not further investigated. The second criterion focused on the syntactic structures of the sentences assessed intraoperatively, analyzing the canonicity of sentence structure (i.e., canonical versus non-canonical word order). The global picture emerging from our analysis indicates that what was investigated in the intraoperative literature is morphosyntactic processing, rather than pure syntax. The study of the neurobiology of syntax during awake surgery seems thus to be still at an early stage, in need of systematic, linguistically grounded investigations.",
keywords = "Awake brain surgery, DES, ECoG, Language, Morphosyntax, Syntax",
author = "Elia Zanin and Marco Riva and Valentina Bambini and Cappa, {Stefano F.} and Lorenzo Magrassi and Andrea Moro",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10072-017-3016-4",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1579--1589",
journal = "Neurological Sciences",
issn = "1590-1874",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of surgical brain mapping to the understanding of the anatomo-functional basis of syntax

T2 - A critical review

AU - Zanin, Elia

AU - Riva, Marco

AU - Bambini, Valentina

AU - Cappa, Stefano F.

AU - Magrassi, Lorenzo

AU - Moro, Andrea

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - A wide range of studies on language assessment during awake brain surgery is nowadays available. Yet, a consensus on a standardized protocol for intraoperative language mapping is still lacking. More specifically, very limited information is offered about intraoperative assessment of a crucial component of language such as syntax. This review aims at critically analyzing the intraoperative studies investigating the cerebral basis of syntactic processing. A comprehensive query was performed on the literature, returning a total of 18 studies. These papers were analyzed according to two complementary criteria, based on the distinction between morphosyntax and syntax. The first criterion focused on the tasks and stimuli employed intraoperatively. Studies were divided into three different groups: group 1 included those studies that overtly aimed at investigating morphosyntactic processes; group 2 included studies that did not explicitly focus on syntax, yet employed stimuli requiring morphosyntactic processing; and group 3 included studies reporting some generic form of syntactic deficit, although not further investigated. The second criterion focused on the syntactic structures of the sentences assessed intraoperatively, analyzing the canonicity of sentence structure (i.e., canonical versus non-canonical word order). The global picture emerging from our analysis indicates that what was investigated in the intraoperative literature is morphosyntactic processing, rather than pure syntax. The study of the neurobiology of syntax during awake surgery seems thus to be still at an early stage, in need of systematic, linguistically grounded investigations.

AB - A wide range of studies on language assessment during awake brain surgery is nowadays available. Yet, a consensus on a standardized protocol for intraoperative language mapping is still lacking. More specifically, very limited information is offered about intraoperative assessment of a crucial component of language such as syntax. This review aims at critically analyzing the intraoperative studies investigating the cerebral basis of syntactic processing. A comprehensive query was performed on the literature, returning a total of 18 studies. These papers were analyzed according to two complementary criteria, based on the distinction between morphosyntax and syntax. The first criterion focused on the tasks and stimuli employed intraoperatively. Studies were divided into three different groups: group 1 included those studies that overtly aimed at investigating morphosyntactic processes; group 2 included studies that did not explicitly focus on syntax, yet employed stimuli requiring morphosyntactic processing; and group 3 included studies reporting some generic form of syntactic deficit, although not further investigated. The second criterion focused on the syntactic structures of the sentences assessed intraoperatively, analyzing the canonicity of sentence structure (i.e., canonical versus non-canonical word order). The global picture emerging from our analysis indicates that what was investigated in the intraoperative literature is morphosyntactic processing, rather than pure syntax. The study of the neurobiology of syntax during awake surgery seems thus to be still at an early stage, in need of systematic, linguistically grounded investigations.

KW - Awake brain surgery

KW - DES

KW - ECoG

KW - Language

KW - Morphosyntax

KW - Syntax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020538235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020538235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10072-017-3016-4

DO - 10.1007/s10072-017-3016-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 38

SP - 1579

EP - 1589

JO - Neurological Sciences

JF - Neurological Sciences

SN - 1590-1874

IS - 9

ER -