The conventional non-articulated SACH or a multiaxial prosthetic foot for hypomobile transtibial amputees? A clinical comparison on mobility, balance, and quality of life

Francesco Paradisi, Anna Sofia Delussu, Stefano Brunelli, Marco Iosa, Roberto Pellegrini, Daniele Zenardi, Marco Traballesi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The effects of a non-articulated SACH and a multiaxial foot-ankle mechanism on the performance of low-activity users are of great interest for practitioners in amputee rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare these two prosthetic feet and assess possible improvements introduced by the increased degrees of freedom provided by the multiaxial foot. For this purpose, a group of 20 hypomobile transtibial amputees (TTAs) had their usual SACH replaced with a multiaxial foot. Participants' functional mobility, involving ambulatory skills in overground level walking, ramps, and stairs, was evaluated by performing Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT), Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Hill Assessment Index (HAI), and Stair Assessment Index (SAI). Balance performances were assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and analysing upper body accelerations during gait. Moreover, the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was performed to indicate the prosthesis-related quality of life. Results showed that participants walked faster using the multiaxial foot (p

Original languageEnglish
Article number261801
JournalTheScientificWorldJournal
Volume2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Amputees
Stairs
Prosthetics
quality of life
Foot
Quality of Life
walking
Patient rehabilitation
Prostheses and Implants
Walking
Architectural Accessibility
Gait
Ankle
Rehabilitation
comparison
index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The conventional non-articulated SACH or a multiaxial prosthetic foot for hypomobile transtibial amputees? A clinical comparison on mobility, balance, and quality of life. / Paradisi, Francesco; Delussu, Anna Sofia; Brunelli, Stefano; Iosa, Marco; Pellegrini, Roberto; Zenardi, Daniele; Traballesi, Marco.

In: TheScientificWorldJournal, Vol. 2015, 261801, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3c240a7eae944f8ba7554a823dc1cad,
title = "The conventional non-articulated SACH or a multiaxial prosthetic foot for hypomobile transtibial amputees? A clinical comparison on mobility, balance, and quality of life",
abstract = "The effects of a non-articulated SACH and a multiaxial foot-ankle mechanism on the performance of low-activity users are of great interest for practitioners in amputee rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare these two prosthetic feet and assess possible improvements introduced by the increased degrees of freedom provided by the multiaxial foot. For this purpose, a group of 20 hypomobile transtibial amputees (TTAs) had their usual SACH replaced with a multiaxial foot. Participants' functional mobility, involving ambulatory skills in overground level walking, ramps, and stairs, was evaluated by performing Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT), Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Hill Assessment Index (HAI), and Stair Assessment Index (SAI). Balance performances were assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and analysing upper body accelerations during gait. Moreover, the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was performed to indicate the prosthesis-related quality of life. Results showed that participants walked faster using the multiaxial foot (p",
author = "Francesco Paradisi and Delussu, {Anna Sofia} and Stefano Brunelli and Marco Iosa and Roberto Pellegrini and Daniele Zenardi and Marco Traballesi",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1155/2015/261801",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
journal = "The Scientific World Journal",
issn = "2356-6140",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conventional non-articulated SACH or a multiaxial prosthetic foot for hypomobile transtibial amputees? A clinical comparison on mobility, balance, and quality of life

AU - Paradisi, Francesco

AU - Delussu, Anna Sofia

AU - Brunelli, Stefano

AU - Iosa, Marco

AU - Pellegrini, Roberto

AU - Zenardi, Daniele

AU - Traballesi, Marco

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The effects of a non-articulated SACH and a multiaxial foot-ankle mechanism on the performance of low-activity users are of great interest for practitioners in amputee rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare these two prosthetic feet and assess possible improvements introduced by the increased degrees of freedom provided by the multiaxial foot. For this purpose, a group of 20 hypomobile transtibial amputees (TTAs) had their usual SACH replaced with a multiaxial foot. Participants' functional mobility, involving ambulatory skills in overground level walking, ramps, and stairs, was evaluated by performing Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT), Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Hill Assessment Index (HAI), and Stair Assessment Index (SAI). Balance performances were assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and analysing upper body accelerations during gait. Moreover, the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was performed to indicate the prosthesis-related quality of life. Results showed that participants walked faster using the multiaxial foot (p

AB - The effects of a non-articulated SACH and a multiaxial foot-ankle mechanism on the performance of low-activity users are of great interest for practitioners in amputee rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare these two prosthetic feet and assess possible improvements introduced by the increased degrees of freedom provided by the multiaxial foot. For this purpose, a group of 20 hypomobile transtibial amputees (TTAs) had their usual SACH replaced with a multiaxial foot. Participants' functional mobility, involving ambulatory skills in overground level walking, ramps, and stairs, was evaluated by performing Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT), Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Hill Assessment Index (HAI), and Stair Assessment Index (SAI). Balance performances were assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and analysing upper body accelerations during gait. Moreover, the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was performed to indicate the prosthesis-related quality of life. Results showed that participants walked faster using the multiaxial foot (p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930651307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930651307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2015/261801

DO - 10.1155/2015/261801

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930651307

VL - 2015

JO - The Scientific World Journal

JF - The Scientific World Journal

SN - 2356-6140

M1 - 261801

ER -