The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Maria Luce Caputo, Antonius van Stipdonk, Annekatrin Illner, Gabriele D'Ambrosio, François Regoli, Giulio Conte, Tiziano Moccetti, Catherine Klersy, Frits W. Prinzen, Kevin Vernooy, Angelo Auricchio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: CRT has been proven to achieve most benefit in patients with left bundle branch block morphology (LBBB). However, ECG criteria to define LBBB significantly differ from each other. Objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of different ECG criteria for LBBB definition on survival, hospitalization for heart failure and reverse remodelling in patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and results: Three-hundred-sixteen consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Six different classifications were assessed in baseline ECGs of patients who received a CRT device: a QRS duration of ≥150 ms and LBBB according to AHA/ACC/HRS, ESC 2006, ESC 2009, ESC 2013 and the classification proposed by Strauss and colleagues. In univariate analysis, the ESC 2009 and 2013 and the Strauss classifications were significantly associated with a reduction in cumulative probability for heart failure (HF) and mortality (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.42–0.86, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.87 and HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40–0.80, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the association with the combined endpoint was confirmed only for ESC 2009 and 2013 classifications and for Strauss. Moreover, the cumulative probability of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations was higher in patients who were negative for all the 5 LBBB classifications. Conclusions: This study shows that the strength of the association of LBBB to outcome in CRT depends on the ECG classifications used to define LBBB, the simplest criteria (ESC 2009 and 2013) providing the best association with clinical endpoints in CRT.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Bundle-Branch Block
Electrocardiography
Heart Failure
Hospitalization
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Cause of Death
Multivariate Analysis
Survival
Mortality

Keywords

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Electrocardiology
  • Heart failure
  • Left bundle branch block
  • Response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Caputo, M. L., van Stipdonk, A., Illner, A., D'Ambrosio, G., Regoli, F., Conte, G., ... Auricchio, A. (Accepted/In press). The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. International Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060

The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. / Caputo, Maria Luce; van Stipdonk, Antonius; Illner, Annekatrin; D'Ambrosio, Gabriele; Regoli, François; Conte, Giulio; Moccetti, Tiziano; Klersy, Catherine; Prinzen, Frits W.; Vernooy, Kevin; Auricchio, Angelo.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caputo, ML, van Stipdonk, A, Illner, A, D'Ambrosio, G, Regoli, F, Conte, G, Moccetti, T, Klersy, C, Prinzen, FW, Vernooy, K & Auricchio, A 2018, 'The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy', International Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060
Caputo, Maria Luce ; van Stipdonk, Antonius ; Illner, Annekatrin ; D'Ambrosio, Gabriele ; Regoli, François ; Conte, Giulio ; Moccetti, Tiziano ; Klersy, Catherine ; Prinzen, Frits W. ; Vernooy, Kevin ; Auricchio, Angelo. / The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2018.
@article{a795c23ae9e443ef9cc3157a764aa0b1,
title = "The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy",
abstract = "Background: CRT has been proven to achieve most benefit in patients with left bundle branch block morphology (LBBB). However, ECG criteria to define LBBB significantly differ from each other. Objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of different ECG criteria for LBBB definition on survival, hospitalization for heart failure and reverse remodelling in patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and results: Three-hundred-sixteen consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Six different classifications were assessed in baseline ECGs of patients who received a CRT device: a QRS duration of ≥150 ms and LBBB according to AHA/ACC/HRS, ESC 2006, ESC 2009, ESC 2013 and the classification proposed by Strauss and colleagues. In univariate analysis, the ESC 2009 and 2013 and the Strauss classifications were significantly associated with a reduction in cumulative probability for heart failure (HF) and mortality (HR 0.60, 95{\%}CI 0.42–0.86, HR 0.61, 95{\%} CI 0.43–0.87 and HR 0.57, 95{\%} CI 0.40–0.80, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the association with the combined endpoint was confirmed only for ESC 2009 and 2013 classifications and for Strauss. Moreover, the cumulative probability of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations was higher in patients who were negative for all the 5 LBBB classifications. Conclusions: This study shows that the strength of the association of LBBB to outcome in CRT depends on the ECG classifications used to define LBBB, the simplest criteria (ESC 2009 and 2013) providing the best association with clinical endpoints in CRT.",
keywords = "Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Electrocardiology, Heart failure, Left bundle branch block, Response",
author = "Caputo, {Maria Luce} and {van Stipdonk}, Antonius and Annekatrin Illner and Gabriele D'Ambrosio and Fran{\cc}ois Regoli and Giulio Conte and Tiziano Moccetti and Catherine Klersy and Prinzen, {Frits W.} and Kevin Vernooy and Angelo Auricchio",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

AU - Caputo, Maria Luce

AU - van Stipdonk, Antonius

AU - Illner, Annekatrin

AU - D'Ambrosio, Gabriele

AU - Regoli, François

AU - Conte, Giulio

AU - Moccetti, Tiziano

AU - Klersy, Catherine

AU - Prinzen, Frits W.

AU - Vernooy, Kevin

AU - Auricchio, Angelo

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: CRT has been proven to achieve most benefit in patients with left bundle branch block morphology (LBBB). However, ECG criteria to define LBBB significantly differ from each other. Objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of different ECG criteria for LBBB definition on survival, hospitalization for heart failure and reverse remodelling in patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and results: Three-hundred-sixteen consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Six different classifications were assessed in baseline ECGs of patients who received a CRT device: a QRS duration of ≥150 ms and LBBB according to AHA/ACC/HRS, ESC 2006, ESC 2009, ESC 2013 and the classification proposed by Strauss and colleagues. In univariate analysis, the ESC 2009 and 2013 and the Strauss classifications were significantly associated with a reduction in cumulative probability for heart failure (HF) and mortality (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.42–0.86, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.87 and HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40–0.80, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the association with the combined endpoint was confirmed only for ESC 2009 and 2013 classifications and for Strauss. Moreover, the cumulative probability of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations was higher in patients who were negative for all the 5 LBBB classifications. Conclusions: This study shows that the strength of the association of LBBB to outcome in CRT depends on the ECG classifications used to define LBBB, the simplest criteria (ESC 2009 and 2013) providing the best association with clinical endpoints in CRT.

AB - Background: CRT has been proven to achieve most benefit in patients with left bundle branch block morphology (LBBB). However, ECG criteria to define LBBB significantly differ from each other. Objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of different ECG criteria for LBBB definition on survival, hospitalization for heart failure and reverse remodelling in patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and results: Three-hundred-sixteen consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Six different classifications were assessed in baseline ECGs of patients who received a CRT device: a QRS duration of ≥150 ms and LBBB according to AHA/ACC/HRS, ESC 2006, ESC 2009, ESC 2013 and the classification proposed by Strauss and colleagues. In univariate analysis, the ESC 2009 and 2013 and the Strauss classifications were significantly associated with a reduction in cumulative probability for heart failure (HF) and mortality (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.42–0.86, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.87 and HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40–0.80, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the association with the combined endpoint was confirmed only for ESC 2009 and 2013 classifications and for Strauss. Moreover, the cumulative probability of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations was higher in patients who were negative for all the 5 LBBB classifications. Conclusions: This study shows that the strength of the association of LBBB to outcome in CRT depends on the ECG classifications used to define LBBB, the simplest criteria (ESC 2009 and 2013) providing the best association with clinical endpoints in CRT.

KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - Electrocardiology

KW - Heart failure

KW - Left bundle branch block

KW - Response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049876220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049876220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.060

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049876220

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -