The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics

Giovanni Boniolo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Let us then liken the soul to the natural union of a team of winged horses and their charioteer. The gods have horses and charioteers that are themselves all good and come from good stock besides, while everyone else has a mixture. To begin with, our driver is in charge of a pair of horses; second, one of his horses is beautiful and good and from stock of the same sort, while the other is the opposite and has the opposite sort of bloodline. This means that chariot-driving in our case is inevitably a painfully difficult business. Plato, Phaedrus, 246 a–d. MORAL CAPACITY. Reflecting on the biological foundations of human moral behavior within a Darwinian framework should involve something too often forgotten: finding actual links with what Darwin proposed in his writings. This task should not be intended as a philosophically idle form of deference to an author of the past, but as a necessary step to recover the correct historical and theoretical bases of the problems we are facing. Indeed, an interest in the history does not necessarily mean to commit fallacies akin toargumentum ad verecundiam, but it can take the form of a correctargumentum ad auctoritatem. In considering what Darwin wrote about the biological bases of morality, I will recall some of the theses ofThe Origin of SpeciesandThe Descent of Manthat, mutatis mutandis, could be accepted without much difficulty by those who believe in the correctness and validity of (neo-)Darwinian evolutionism.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEvolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages43-55
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9780511498428, 0521856299, 9780521856294
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Descent
Horse
Instinct
Deference
Fallacies
Deity
Chariot
Correctness
Morality
Plato
Evolutionism
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Boniolo, G. (2006). The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics. In Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology (pp. 43-55). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498428.004

The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics. / Boniolo, Giovanni.

Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology. Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 43-55.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Boniolo, G 2006, The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics. in Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498428.004
Boniolo G. The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics. In Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology. Cambridge University Press. 2006. p. 43-55 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498428.004
Boniolo, Giovanni. / The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics. Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology. Cambridge University Press, 2006. pp. 43-55
@inbook{0f068c488e4541e991078e951d4c61a2,
title = "The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics",
abstract = "Let us then liken the soul to the natural union of a team of winged horses and their charioteer. The gods have horses and charioteers that are themselves all good and come from good stock besides, while everyone else has a mixture. To begin with, our driver is in charge of a pair of horses; second, one of his horses is beautiful and good and from stock of the same sort, while the other is the opposite and has the opposite sort of bloodline. This means that chariot-driving in our case is inevitably a painfully difficult business. Plato, Phaedrus, 246 a–d. MORAL CAPACITY. Reflecting on the biological foundations of human moral behavior within a Darwinian framework should involve something too often forgotten: finding actual links with what Darwin proposed in his writings. This task should not be intended as a philosophically idle form of deference to an author of the past, but as a necessary step to recover the correct historical and theoretical bases of the problems we are facing. Indeed, an interest in the history does not necessarily mean to commit fallacies akin toargumentum ad verecundiam, but it can take the form of a correctargumentum ad auctoritatem. In considering what Darwin wrote about the biological bases of morality, I will recall some of the theses ofThe Origin of SpeciesandThe Descent of Manthat, mutatis mutandis, could be accepted without much difficulty by those who believe in the correctness and validity of (neo-)Darwinian evolutionism.",
author = "Giovanni Boniolo",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511498428.004",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780511498428",
pages = "43--55",
booktitle = "Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The descent of instinct and the ascent of ethics

AU - Boniolo, Giovanni

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Let us then liken the soul to the natural union of a team of winged horses and their charioteer. The gods have horses and charioteers that are themselves all good and come from good stock besides, while everyone else has a mixture. To begin with, our driver is in charge of a pair of horses; second, one of his horses is beautiful and good and from stock of the same sort, while the other is the opposite and has the opposite sort of bloodline. This means that chariot-driving in our case is inevitably a painfully difficult business. Plato, Phaedrus, 246 a–d. MORAL CAPACITY. Reflecting on the biological foundations of human moral behavior within a Darwinian framework should involve something too often forgotten: finding actual links with what Darwin proposed in his writings. This task should not be intended as a philosophically idle form of deference to an author of the past, but as a necessary step to recover the correct historical and theoretical bases of the problems we are facing. Indeed, an interest in the history does not necessarily mean to commit fallacies akin toargumentum ad verecundiam, but it can take the form of a correctargumentum ad auctoritatem. In considering what Darwin wrote about the biological bases of morality, I will recall some of the theses ofThe Origin of SpeciesandThe Descent of Manthat, mutatis mutandis, could be accepted without much difficulty by those who believe in the correctness and validity of (neo-)Darwinian evolutionism.

AB - Let us then liken the soul to the natural union of a team of winged horses and their charioteer. The gods have horses and charioteers that are themselves all good and come from good stock besides, while everyone else has a mixture. To begin with, our driver is in charge of a pair of horses; second, one of his horses is beautiful and good and from stock of the same sort, while the other is the opposite and has the opposite sort of bloodline. This means that chariot-driving in our case is inevitably a painfully difficult business. Plato, Phaedrus, 246 a–d. MORAL CAPACITY. Reflecting on the biological foundations of human moral behavior within a Darwinian framework should involve something too often forgotten: finding actual links with what Darwin proposed in his writings. This task should not be intended as a philosophically idle form of deference to an author of the past, but as a necessary step to recover the correct historical and theoretical bases of the problems we are facing. Indeed, an interest in the history does not necessarily mean to commit fallacies akin toargumentum ad verecundiam, but it can take the form of a correctargumentum ad auctoritatem. In considering what Darwin wrote about the biological bases of morality, I will recall some of the theses ofThe Origin of SpeciesandThe Descent of Manthat, mutatis mutandis, could be accepted without much difficulty by those who believe in the correctness and validity of (neo-)Darwinian evolutionism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928435234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928435234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511498428.004

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511498428.004

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511498428

SN - 0521856299

SN - 9780521856294

SP - 43

EP - 55

BT - Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -