The development of the Metacognition Assessment Interview: Instrument description, factor structure and reliability in a non-clinical sample

Antonio Semerari, Michele Cucchi, Giancarlo Dimaggio, Daniele Cavadini, Antonino Carcione, Vittoria Battelli, Giuseppe Nicolò, Roberto Pedone, Tomaso Siccardi, Stefania D'Angerio, Paolo Ronchi, Cesare Maffei, Enrico Smeraldi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Metacognition is a multi-facet psychological construct; deficits in metacognitive abilities are associated to low social functioning, low quality of life, psychopathology, and symptoms. The aim of this study was to describe and develop a valid and reliable interview for assessing metacognition. Methods: The semi-structured interview, based on the author's theory model of the metacognition construct, is described. The Metacognition Assessment Interview (MAI) is an adaptation of the Metacognition Assessment Scale (MAS) and evaluates how the subject is interviewed used metacognition during his own real life experiences elicited by the interviewer. A user manual was developed to assist the interview and scoring procedure. Results: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed preliminary evidence of a two factor-hierarchical structure, with two lower-order scales, representing the two main theoretical domains of the metacognitive function, "the Self" and "the Other", and one single higher-order scale that we labelled metacognition. Contrary to the authors' prediction the existence of the four distinct dimensions under the two domains was not confirmed. The MAI and its two domains demonstrated acceptable levels of inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Conclusions: The MAI appears to be a promising instrument for assessing metacognition. Future psychometric validation steps and clinical directions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)890-895
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume200
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 30 2012

Fingerprint

Interviews
Statistical Factor Analysis
Metacognition
Aptitude
Life Change Events
Psychopathology
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Psychology

Keywords

  • Factor structure
  • Interview
  • Metacognition
  • Metacognition assessment
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

The development of the Metacognition Assessment Interview : Instrument description, factor structure and reliability in a non-clinical sample. / Semerari, Antonio; Cucchi, Michele; Dimaggio, Giancarlo; Cavadini, Daniele; Carcione, Antonino; Battelli, Vittoria; Nicolò, Giuseppe; Pedone, Roberto; Siccardi, Tomaso; D'Angerio, Stefania; Ronchi, Paolo; Maffei, Cesare; Smeraldi, Enrico.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 200, No. 2-3, 30.12.2012, p. 890-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Semerari, A, Cucchi, M, Dimaggio, G, Cavadini, D, Carcione, A, Battelli, V, Nicolò, G, Pedone, R, Siccardi, T, D'Angerio, S, Ronchi, P, Maffei, C & Smeraldi, E 2012, 'The development of the Metacognition Assessment Interview: Instrument description, factor structure and reliability in a non-clinical sample', Psychiatry Research, vol. 200, no. 2-3, pp. 890-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.015
Semerari, Antonio ; Cucchi, Michele ; Dimaggio, Giancarlo ; Cavadini, Daniele ; Carcione, Antonino ; Battelli, Vittoria ; Nicolò, Giuseppe ; Pedone, Roberto ; Siccardi, Tomaso ; D'Angerio, Stefania ; Ronchi, Paolo ; Maffei, Cesare ; Smeraldi, Enrico. / The development of the Metacognition Assessment Interview : Instrument description, factor structure and reliability in a non-clinical sample. In: Psychiatry Research. 2012 ; Vol. 200, No. 2-3. pp. 890-895.
@article{bc7ecc000e854b93bc810db5596d1d77,
title = "The development of the Metacognition Assessment Interview: Instrument description, factor structure and reliability in a non-clinical sample",
abstract = "Background: Metacognition is a multi-facet psychological construct; deficits in metacognitive abilities are associated to low social functioning, low quality of life, psychopathology, and symptoms. The aim of this study was to describe and develop a valid and reliable interview for assessing metacognition. Methods: The semi-structured interview, based on the author's theory model of the metacognition construct, is described. The Metacognition Assessment Interview (MAI) is an adaptation of the Metacognition Assessment Scale (MAS) and evaluates how the subject is interviewed used metacognition during his own real life experiences elicited by the interviewer. A user manual was developed to assist the interview and scoring procedure. Results: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed preliminary evidence of a two factor-hierarchical structure, with two lower-order scales, representing the two main theoretical domains of the metacognitive function, {"}the Self{"} and {"}the Other{"}, and one single higher-order scale that we labelled metacognition. Contrary to the authors' prediction the existence of the four distinct dimensions under the two domains was not confirmed. The MAI and its two domains demonstrated acceptable levels of inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Conclusions: The MAI appears to be a promising instrument for assessing metacognition. Future psychometric validation steps and clinical directions are discussed.",
keywords = "Factor structure, Interview, Metacognition, Metacognition assessment, Reliability",
author = "Antonio Semerari and Michele Cucchi and Giancarlo Dimaggio and Daniele Cavadini and Antonino Carcione and Vittoria Battelli and Giuseppe Nicol{\`o} and Roberto Pedone and Tomaso Siccardi and Stefania D'Angerio and Paolo Ronchi and Cesare Maffei and Enrico Smeraldi",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.015",
language = "English",
volume = "200",
pages = "890--895",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of the Metacognition Assessment Interview

T2 - Instrument description, factor structure and reliability in a non-clinical sample

AU - Semerari, Antonio

AU - Cucchi, Michele

AU - Dimaggio, Giancarlo

AU - Cavadini, Daniele

AU - Carcione, Antonino

AU - Battelli, Vittoria

AU - Nicolò, Giuseppe

AU - Pedone, Roberto

AU - Siccardi, Tomaso

AU - D'Angerio, Stefania

AU - Ronchi, Paolo

AU - Maffei, Cesare

AU - Smeraldi, Enrico

PY - 2012/12/30

Y1 - 2012/12/30

N2 - Background: Metacognition is a multi-facet psychological construct; deficits in metacognitive abilities are associated to low social functioning, low quality of life, psychopathology, and symptoms. The aim of this study was to describe and develop a valid and reliable interview for assessing metacognition. Methods: The semi-structured interview, based on the author's theory model of the metacognition construct, is described. The Metacognition Assessment Interview (MAI) is an adaptation of the Metacognition Assessment Scale (MAS) and evaluates how the subject is interviewed used metacognition during his own real life experiences elicited by the interviewer. A user manual was developed to assist the interview and scoring procedure. Results: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed preliminary evidence of a two factor-hierarchical structure, with two lower-order scales, representing the two main theoretical domains of the metacognitive function, "the Self" and "the Other", and one single higher-order scale that we labelled metacognition. Contrary to the authors' prediction the existence of the four distinct dimensions under the two domains was not confirmed. The MAI and its two domains demonstrated acceptable levels of inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Conclusions: The MAI appears to be a promising instrument for assessing metacognition. Future psychometric validation steps and clinical directions are discussed.

AB - Background: Metacognition is a multi-facet psychological construct; deficits in metacognitive abilities are associated to low social functioning, low quality of life, psychopathology, and symptoms. The aim of this study was to describe and develop a valid and reliable interview for assessing metacognition. Methods: The semi-structured interview, based on the author's theory model of the metacognition construct, is described. The Metacognition Assessment Interview (MAI) is an adaptation of the Metacognition Assessment Scale (MAS) and evaluates how the subject is interviewed used metacognition during his own real life experiences elicited by the interviewer. A user manual was developed to assist the interview and scoring procedure. Results: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed preliminary evidence of a two factor-hierarchical structure, with two lower-order scales, representing the two main theoretical domains of the metacognitive function, "the Self" and "the Other", and one single higher-order scale that we labelled metacognition. Contrary to the authors' prediction the existence of the four distinct dimensions under the two domains was not confirmed. The MAI and its two domains demonstrated acceptable levels of inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Conclusions: The MAI appears to be a promising instrument for assessing metacognition. Future psychometric validation steps and clinical directions are discussed.

KW - Factor structure

KW - Interview

KW - Metacognition

KW - Metacognition assessment

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872419626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872419626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 22906953

AN - SCOPUS:84872419626

VL - 200

SP - 890

EP - 895

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 2-3

ER -