TY - JOUR
T1 - The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair
T2 - A simple solution for complex problems
AU - Alfieri, Ottavio
AU - Maisano, Francesco
AU - De Bonis, Michele
AU - Stefano, Pier Luigi
AU - Torracca, Lucia
AU - Oppizzi, Michele
AU - La Canna, Giovanni
AU - Miller, D. Craig
PY - 2001/10/1
Y1 - 2001/10/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study is to report our results with the central doubleorifice technique used for the treatment of complex mitral valve lesions. Methods: The central double-orifice repair has been used in 260 patients (mean age, 56 ± 14.3 years) over a period of 7 years. The mechanism responsible for mitral regurgitation was prolapse of both leaflets in 148 patients, prolapse of the anterior leaflet in 68, prolapse of the posterior leaflet with annular calcification or other unfavorable features in 31, and lack of leaflet coaptation for restricted motion or erosion of the free edge in 13. Degenerative disease was the cause of mitral regurgitation in 80.8% of the patients, rheumatic disease was the cause in 9.6%, endocarditis was the cause in 6.1%, and ischemic disease was the cause in 2.3%. Results: Hospital mortality was 0.7%, and the overall survival at 5 years was 94.4% ± 2.59%. Thirteen patients required a reoperation (2 early postoperatively and 11 late during the follow-up), for an overall freedom from reoperation of 90.0% ± 3.37% at 5 years. Freedom from reoperation was lower in patients with rheumatic valve disease and in patients who did not undergo an annuloplasty procedure. Conclusions: The effectiveness and durability of the central double-orifice technique were assessed in this study. This type of repair can be a useful addition to the surgical armamentarium in.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study is to report our results with the central doubleorifice technique used for the treatment of complex mitral valve lesions. Methods: The central double-orifice repair has been used in 260 patients (mean age, 56 ± 14.3 years) over a period of 7 years. The mechanism responsible for mitral regurgitation was prolapse of both leaflets in 148 patients, prolapse of the anterior leaflet in 68, prolapse of the posterior leaflet with annular calcification or other unfavorable features in 31, and lack of leaflet coaptation for restricted motion or erosion of the free edge in 13. Degenerative disease was the cause of mitral regurgitation in 80.8% of the patients, rheumatic disease was the cause in 9.6%, endocarditis was the cause in 6.1%, and ischemic disease was the cause in 2.3%. Results: Hospital mortality was 0.7%, and the overall survival at 5 years was 94.4% ± 2.59%. Thirteen patients required a reoperation (2 early postoperatively and 11 late during the follow-up), for an overall freedom from reoperation of 90.0% ± 3.37% at 5 years. Freedom from reoperation was lower in patients with rheumatic valve disease and in patients who did not undergo an annuloplasty procedure. Conclusions: The effectiveness and durability of the central double-orifice technique were assessed in this study. This type of repair can be a useful addition to the surgical armamentarium in.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035497321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035497321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mtc.2001.117277
DO - 10.1067/mtc.2001.117277
M3 - Article
C2 - 11581597
AN - SCOPUS:0035497321
VL - 122
SP - 674
EP - 681
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
SN - 0022-5223
IS - 4
ER -