The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks

Federico Quinzi, Martina Scalia, Arrigo Giombini, Alessandra Di Cagno, Fabio Pigozzi, Maurizio Casasco, Andrea Macaluso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the acute effect of the combined and single use of two orthotic devices (neck balance system [NBS] and lumbar support [LS]) on muscle activity of neck and back muscles during typical computer working tasks. Background: An excessive activation of neck muscles could threaten the balance between agonist and antagonist muscles, resulting in a lower stability of the head and possibly leading to neck pain. At present, no study evaluated the effect of a specific orthotic device in reducing neck muscles activation. Methods: Surface electromyography (sEMG) from neck flexor (sternocleidomastoid [SCMD]) and extensor muscles (semispinalis capitis [SPC]) and back extensor muscles (erector spinae [ERS]) of 20 healthy individuals was recorded during three computer working tasks performed with the NBS, with NBS and LS, with the LS, and without devices (ND). Results: In the NBS condition, the SPC showed a reduced activation (NBS = 3.97%; NBS + LS = 4.49%; LS = 4.48%; ND = 4.61% of the maximal voluntary contraction) compared to the other conditions. Conclusions: The use of the NBS promotes a reduction of neck extensor muscles, possibly due to the inertial mass added in the occipital part of the head, producing an external neck extensor moment that cooperates with that produced by neck extensor muscles. Application: Orthotic devices such as the NBS may be used by computer workers to reduce the activation of their neck extensor muscles and possible risks of developing neck pain.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Factors
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Orthotics
Neck Muscles
Orthotic Devices
Muscle
Neck
activation
Chemical activation
Back Muscles
Paraspinal Muscles
Neck Pain
pain
Muscles
Head
Electromyography

Keywords

  • neck balance system
  • neck muscles
  • orthotic devices
  • sEMG

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Quinzi, F., Scalia, M., Giombini, A., Di Cagno, A., Pigozzi, F., Casasco, M., & Macaluso, A. (Accepted/In press). The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818814957

The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks. / Quinzi, Federico; Scalia, Martina; Giombini, Arrigo; Di Cagno, Alessandra; Pigozzi, Fabio; Casasco, Maurizio; Macaluso, Andrea.

In: Human Factors, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quinzi, F, Scalia, M, Giombini, A, Di Cagno, A, Pigozzi, F, Casasco, M & Macaluso, A 2019, 'The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks', Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818814957
Quinzi, Federico ; Scalia, Martina ; Giombini, Arrigo ; Di Cagno, Alessandra ; Pigozzi, Fabio ; Casasco, Maurizio ; Macaluso, Andrea. / The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks. In: Human Factors. 2019.
@article{d18a579e252c47faab28d4808cfc79bb,
title = "The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the acute effect of the combined and single use of two orthotic devices (neck balance system [NBS] and lumbar support [LS]) on muscle activity of neck and back muscles during typical computer working tasks. Background: An excessive activation of neck muscles could threaten the balance between agonist and antagonist muscles, resulting in a lower stability of the head and possibly leading to neck pain. At present, no study evaluated the effect of a specific orthotic device in reducing neck muscles activation. Methods: Surface electromyography (sEMG) from neck flexor (sternocleidomastoid [SCMD]) and extensor muscles (semispinalis capitis [SPC]) and back extensor muscles (erector spinae [ERS]) of 20 healthy individuals was recorded during three computer working tasks performed with the NBS, with NBS and LS, with the LS, and without devices (ND). Results: In the NBS condition, the SPC showed a reduced activation (NBS = 3.97{\%}; NBS + LS = 4.49{\%}; LS = 4.48{\%}; ND = 4.61{\%} of the maximal voluntary contraction) compared to the other conditions. Conclusions: The use of the NBS promotes a reduction of neck extensor muscles, possibly due to the inertial mass added in the occipital part of the head, producing an external neck extensor moment that cooperates with that produced by neck extensor muscles. Application: Orthotic devices such as the NBS may be used by computer workers to reduce the activation of their neck extensor muscles and possible risks of developing neck pain.",
keywords = "neck balance system, neck muscles, orthotic devices, sEMG",
author = "Federico Quinzi and Martina Scalia and Arrigo Giombini and {Di Cagno}, Alessandra and Fabio Pigozzi and Maurizio Casasco and Andrea Macaluso",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018720818814957",
language = "English",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of an Orthotic Device for Balancing Neck Muscles During Daily Office Tasks

AU - Quinzi, Federico

AU - Scalia, Martina

AU - Giombini, Arrigo

AU - Di Cagno, Alessandra

AU - Pigozzi, Fabio

AU - Casasco, Maurizio

AU - Macaluso, Andrea

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the acute effect of the combined and single use of two orthotic devices (neck balance system [NBS] and lumbar support [LS]) on muscle activity of neck and back muscles during typical computer working tasks. Background: An excessive activation of neck muscles could threaten the balance between agonist and antagonist muscles, resulting in a lower stability of the head and possibly leading to neck pain. At present, no study evaluated the effect of a specific orthotic device in reducing neck muscles activation. Methods: Surface electromyography (sEMG) from neck flexor (sternocleidomastoid [SCMD]) and extensor muscles (semispinalis capitis [SPC]) and back extensor muscles (erector spinae [ERS]) of 20 healthy individuals was recorded during three computer working tasks performed with the NBS, with NBS and LS, with the LS, and without devices (ND). Results: In the NBS condition, the SPC showed a reduced activation (NBS = 3.97%; NBS + LS = 4.49%; LS = 4.48%; ND = 4.61% of the maximal voluntary contraction) compared to the other conditions. Conclusions: The use of the NBS promotes a reduction of neck extensor muscles, possibly due to the inertial mass added in the occipital part of the head, producing an external neck extensor moment that cooperates with that produced by neck extensor muscles. Application: Orthotic devices such as the NBS may be used by computer workers to reduce the activation of their neck extensor muscles and possible risks of developing neck pain.

AB - Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the acute effect of the combined and single use of two orthotic devices (neck balance system [NBS] and lumbar support [LS]) on muscle activity of neck and back muscles during typical computer working tasks. Background: An excessive activation of neck muscles could threaten the balance between agonist and antagonist muscles, resulting in a lower stability of the head and possibly leading to neck pain. At present, no study evaluated the effect of a specific orthotic device in reducing neck muscles activation. Methods: Surface electromyography (sEMG) from neck flexor (sternocleidomastoid [SCMD]) and extensor muscles (semispinalis capitis [SPC]) and back extensor muscles (erector spinae [ERS]) of 20 healthy individuals was recorded during three computer working tasks performed with the NBS, with NBS and LS, with the LS, and without devices (ND). Results: In the NBS condition, the SPC showed a reduced activation (NBS = 3.97%; NBS + LS = 4.49%; LS = 4.48%; ND = 4.61% of the maximal voluntary contraction) compared to the other conditions. Conclusions: The use of the NBS promotes a reduction of neck extensor muscles, possibly due to the inertial mass added in the occipital part of the head, producing an external neck extensor moment that cooperates with that produced by neck extensor muscles. Application: Orthotic devices such as the NBS may be used by computer workers to reduce the activation of their neck extensor muscles and possible risks of developing neck pain.

KW - neck balance system

KW - neck muscles

KW - orthotic devices

KW - sEMG

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059954480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059954480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720818814957

DO - 10.1177/0018720818814957

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059954480

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

ER -