The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees

David C. Morgenroth, Ava D. Segal, Karl E. Zelik, Joseph M. Czerniecki, Glenn K. Klute, Peter G. Adamczyk, Michael S. Orendurff, Michael E. Hahn, Steven H. Collins, Art D. Kuo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lower extremity amputation not only limits mobility, but also increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis of the intact limb. Dynamic walking models of non-amputees suggest that pushing-off from the trailing limb can reduce collision forces on the leading limb. These collision forces may determine the peak knee external adduction moment (EAM), which has been linked to the development of knee OA in the general population. We therefore hypothesized that greater prosthetic push-off would lead to reduced loading and knee EAM of the intact limb in unilateral transtibial amputees.Seven unilateral transtibial amputees were studied during gait under three prosthetic foot conditions that were intended to vary push-off. Prosthetic foot-ankle push-off work, intact limb knee EAM and ground reaction impulses for both limbs during step-to-step transition were measured.Overall, trailing limb prosthetic push-off work was negatively correlated with leading intact limb 1st peak knee EAM (slope = -72 ± .22; p=.011). Prosthetic push-off work and 1st peak intact knee EAM varied significantly with foot type. The prosthetic foot condition with the least push-off demonstrated the largest knee EAM, which was reduced by 26% with the prosthetic foot producing the most push-off. Trailing prosthetic limb push-off impulse was negatively correlated with leading intact limb loading impulse (slope = -34 ± .14; p=.001), which may help explain how prosthetic limb push-off can affect intact limb loading.Prosthetic feet that perform more prosthetic push-off appear to be associated with a reduction in 1st peak intact knee EAM, and their use could potentially reduce the risk and burden of knee osteoarthritis in this population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-507
Number of pages6
JournalGait and Posture
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Amputees
Knee Osteoarthritis
Foot
Lower Extremity
Extremities
Knee
Gait
Amputation
Ankle
Population
Walking

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Biomechanics
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Prosthesis
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Morgenroth, D. C., Segal, A. D., Zelik, K. E., Czerniecki, J. M., Klute, G. K., Adamczyk, P. G., ... Kuo, A. D. (2011). The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees. Gait and Posture, 34(4), 502-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.001

The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees. / Morgenroth, David C.; Segal, Ava D.; Zelik, Karl E.; Czerniecki, Joseph M.; Klute, Glenn K.; Adamczyk, Peter G.; Orendurff, Michael S.; Hahn, Michael E.; Collins, Steven H.; Kuo, Art D.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 34, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 502-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morgenroth, DC, Segal, AD, Zelik, KE, Czerniecki, JM, Klute, GK, Adamczyk, PG, Orendurff, MS, Hahn, ME, Collins, SH & Kuo, AD 2011, 'The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees', Gait and Posture, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 502-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.001
Morgenroth, David C. ; Segal, Ava D. ; Zelik, Karl E. ; Czerniecki, Joseph M. ; Klute, Glenn K. ; Adamczyk, Peter G. ; Orendurff, Michael S. ; Hahn, Michael E. ; Collins, Steven H. ; Kuo, Art D. / The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees. In: Gait and Posture. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 502-507.
@article{cf8604e96a464bde9e652b140ca14fa5,
title = "The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees",
abstract = "Lower extremity amputation not only limits mobility, but also increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis of the intact limb. Dynamic walking models of non-amputees suggest that pushing-off from the trailing limb can reduce collision forces on the leading limb. These collision forces may determine the peak knee external adduction moment (EAM), which has been linked to the development of knee OA in the general population. We therefore hypothesized that greater prosthetic push-off would lead to reduced loading and knee EAM of the intact limb in unilateral transtibial amputees.Seven unilateral transtibial amputees were studied during gait under three prosthetic foot conditions that were intended to vary push-off. Prosthetic foot-ankle push-off work, intact limb knee EAM and ground reaction impulses for both limbs during step-to-step transition were measured.Overall, trailing limb prosthetic push-off work was negatively correlated with leading intact limb 1st peak knee EAM (slope = -72 ± .22; p=.011). Prosthetic push-off work and 1st peak intact knee EAM varied significantly with foot type. The prosthetic foot condition with the least push-off demonstrated the largest knee EAM, which was reduced by 26{\%} with the prosthetic foot producing the most push-off. Trailing prosthetic limb push-off impulse was negatively correlated with leading intact limb loading impulse (slope = -34 ± .14; p=.001), which may help explain how prosthetic limb push-off can affect intact limb loading.Prosthetic feet that perform more prosthetic push-off appear to be associated with a reduction in 1st peak intact knee EAM, and their use could potentially reduce the risk and burden of knee osteoarthritis in this population.",
keywords = "Amputation, Biomechanics, Osteoarthritis, Prosthesis, Rehabilitation",
author = "Morgenroth, {David C.} and Segal, {Ava D.} and Zelik, {Karl E.} and Czerniecki, {Joseph M.} and Klute, {Glenn K.} and Adamczyk, {Peter G.} and Orendurff, {Michael S.} and Hahn, {Michael E.} and Collins, {Steven H.} and Kuo, {Art D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "502--507",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees

AU - Morgenroth, David C.

AU - Segal, Ava D.

AU - Zelik, Karl E.

AU - Czerniecki, Joseph M.

AU - Klute, Glenn K.

AU - Adamczyk, Peter G.

AU - Orendurff, Michael S.

AU - Hahn, Michael E.

AU - Collins, Steven H.

AU - Kuo, Art D.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Lower extremity amputation not only limits mobility, but also increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis of the intact limb. Dynamic walking models of non-amputees suggest that pushing-off from the trailing limb can reduce collision forces on the leading limb. These collision forces may determine the peak knee external adduction moment (EAM), which has been linked to the development of knee OA in the general population. We therefore hypothesized that greater prosthetic push-off would lead to reduced loading and knee EAM of the intact limb in unilateral transtibial amputees.Seven unilateral transtibial amputees were studied during gait under three prosthetic foot conditions that were intended to vary push-off. Prosthetic foot-ankle push-off work, intact limb knee EAM and ground reaction impulses for both limbs during step-to-step transition were measured.Overall, trailing limb prosthetic push-off work was negatively correlated with leading intact limb 1st peak knee EAM (slope = -72 ± .22; p=.011). Prosthetic push-off work and 1st peak intact knee EAM varied significantly with foot type. The prosthetic foot condition with the least push-off demonstrated the largest knee EAM, which was reduced by 26% with the prosthetic foot producing the most push-off. Trailing prosthetic limb push-off impulse was negatively correlated with leading intact limb loading impulse (slope = -34 ± .14; p=.001), which may help explain how prosthetic limb push-off can affect intact limb loading.Prosthetic feet that perform more prosthetic push-off appear to be associated with a reduction in 1st peak intact knee EAM, and their use could potentially reduce the risk and burden of knee osteoarthritis in this population.

AB - Lower extremity amputation not only limits mobility, but also increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis of the intact limb. Dynamic walking models of non-amputees suggest that pushing-off from the trailing limb can reduce collision forces on the leading limb. These collision forces may determine the peak knee external adduction moment (EAM), which has been linked to the development of knee OA in the general population. We therefore hypothesized that greater prosthetic push-off would lead to reduced loading and knee EAM of the intact limb in unilateral transtibial amputees.Seven unilateral transtibial amputees were studied during gait under three prosthetic foot conditions that were intended to vary push-off. Prosthetic foot-ankle push-off work, intact limb knee EAM and ground reaction impulses for both limbs during step-to-step transition were measured.Overall, trailing limb prosthetic push-off work was negatively correlated with leading intact limb 1st peak knee EAM (slope = -72 ± .22; p=.011). Prosthetic push-off work and 1st peak intact knee EAM varied significantly with foot type. The prosthetic foot condition with the least push-off demonstrated the largest knee EAM, which was reduced by 26% with the prosthetic foot producing the most push-off. Trailing prosthetic limb push-off impulse was negatively correlated with leading intact limb loading impulse (slope = -34 ± .14; p=.001), which may help explain how prosthetic limb push-off can affect intact limb loading.Prosthetic feet that perform more prosthetic push-off appear to be associated with a reduction in 1st peak intact knee EAM, and their use could potentially reduce the risk and burden of knee osteoarthritis in this population.

KW - Amputation

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Prosthesis

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053561645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053561645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 502

EP - 507

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 4

ER -