The effect of strategic memory training in older adults

who benefits most?

Alessia Rosi, Federica Del Signore, Elisa Canelli, Nicola Allegri, Sara Bottiroli, Tomaso Vecchi, Elena Cavallini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:: Previous research has suggested that there is a degree of variability among older adults’ response to memory training, such that some individuals benefit more than others. The aim of the present study was to identify the profile of older adults who were likely to benefit most from a strategic memory training program that has previously proved to be effective in improving memory in healthy older adults. Method:: In total, 44 older adults (60–83 years) participated in a strategic memory training. We examined memory training benefits by measuring changes in memory practiced (word list learning) and non-practiced tasks (grocery list and associative learning). In addition, a battery of cognitive measures was administered in order to assess crystallized and fluid abilities, short-term memory, working memory, and processing speed. Results:: Results confirmed the efficacy of the training in improving performance in both practiced and non-practiced memory tasks. For the practiced memory tasks, results showed that memory baseline performance and crystallized ability predicted training gains. For the non-practiced memory tasks, analyses showed that memory baseline performance was a significant predictor of gain in the grocery list learning task. For the associative learning task, the significant predictors were memory baseline performance, processing speed, and marginally the age. Conclusions:: Our results indicate that older adults with a higher baseline memory capacity and with more efficient cognitive resources were those who tended to benefit most from the training. The present study provides new avenues in designing personalized intervention according to the older adults’ cognitive profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Dec 7 2017

Fingerprint

Learning
Aptitude
Short-Term Memory
Education
Research

Keywords

  • gain
  • individual differences
  • memory
  • older adults
  • predictors
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The effect of strategic memory training in older adults : who benefits most? / Rosi, Alessia; Del Signore, Federica; Canelli, Elisa; Allegri, Nicola; Bottiroli, Sara; Vecchi, Tomaso; Cavallini, Elena.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, 07.12.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosi, Alessia ; Del Signore, Federica ; Canelli, Elisa ; Allegri, Nicola ; Bottiroli, Sara ; Vecchi, Tomaso ; Cavallini, Elena. / The effect of strategic memory training in older adults : who benefits most?. In: International Psychogeriatrics. 2017 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{947b6e9cf583462b9e3f898def894501,
title = "The effect of strategic memory training in older adults: who benefits most?",
abstract = "Background:: Previous research has suggested that there is a degree of variability among older adults’ response to memory training, such that some individuals benefit more than others. The aim of the present study was to identify the profile of older adults who were likely to benefit most from a strategic memory training program that has previously proved to be effective in improving memory in healthy older adults. Method:: In total, 44 older adults (60–83 years) participated in a strategic memory training. We examined memory training benefits by measuring changes in memory practiced (word list learning) and non-practiced tasks (grocery list and associative learning). In addition, a battery of cognitive measures was administered in order to assess crystallized and fluid abilities, short-term memory, working memory, and processing speed. Results:: Results confirmed the efficacy of the training in improving performance in both practiced and non-practiced memory tasks. For the practiced memory tasks, results showed that memory baseline performance and crystallized ability predicted training gains. For the non-practiced memory tasks, analyses showed that memory baseline performance was a significant predictor of gain in the grocery list learning task. For the associative learning task, the significant predictors were memory baseline performance, processing speed, and marginally the age. Conclusions:: Our results indicate that older adults with a higher baseline memory capacity and with more efficient cognitive resources were those who tended to benefit most from the training. The present study provides new avenues in designing personalized intervention according to the older adults’ cognitive profile.",
keywords = "gain, individual differences, memory, older adults, predictors, training",
author = "Alessia Rosi and {Del Signore}, Federica and Elisa Canelli and Nicola Allegri and Sara Bottiroli and Tomaso Vecchi and Elena Cavallini",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610217002691",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of strategic memory training in older adults

T2 - who benefits most?

AU - Rosi, Alessia

AU - Del Signore, Federica

AU - Canelli, Elisa

AU - Allegri, Nicola

AU - Bottiroli, Sara

AU - Vecchi, Tomaso

AU - Cavallini, Elena

PY - 2017/12/7

Y1 - 2017/12/7

N2 - Background:: Previous research has suggested that there is a degree of variability among older adults’ response to memory training, such that some individuals benefit more than others. The aim of the present study was to identify the profile of older adults who were likely to benefit most from a strategic memory training program that has previously proved to be effective in improving memory in healthy older adults. Method:: In total, 44 older adults (60–83 years) participated in a strategic memory training. We examined memory training benefits by measuring changes in memory practiced (word list learning) and non-practiced tasks (grocery list and associative learning). In addition, a battery of cognitive measures was administered in order to assess crystallized and fluid abilities, short-term memory, working memory, and processing speed. Results:: Results confirmed the efficacy of the training in improving performance in both practiced and non-practiced memory tasks. For the practiced memory tasks, results showed that memory baseline performance and crystallized ability predicted training gains. For the non-practiced memory tasks, analyses showed that memory baseline performance was a significant predictor of gain in the grocery list learning task. For the associative learning task, the significant predictors were memory baseline performance, processing speed, and marginally the age. Conclusions:: Our results indicate that older adults with a higher baseline memory capacity and with more efficient cognitive resources were those who tended to benefit most from the training. The present study provides new avenues in designing personalized intervention according to the older adults’ cognitive profile.

AB - Background:: Previous research has suggested that there is a degree of variability among older adults’ response to memory training, such that some individuals benefit more than others. The aim of the present study was to identify the profile of older adults who were likely to benefit most from a strategic memory training program that has previously proved to be effective in improving memory in healthy older adults. Method:: In total, 44 older adults (60–83 years) participated in a strategic memory training. We examined memory training benefits by measuring changes in memory practiced (word list learning) and non-practiced tasks (grocery list and associative learning). In addition, a battery of cognitive measures was administered in order to assess crystallized and fluid abilities, short-term memory, working memory, and processing speed. Results:: Results confirmed the efficacy of the training in improving performance in both practiced and non-practiced memory tasks. For the practiced memory tasks, results showed that memory baseline performance and crystallized ability predicted training gains. For the non-practiced memory tasks, analyses showed that memory baseline performance was a significant predictor of gain in the grocery list learning task. For the associative learning task, the significant predictors were memory baseline performance, processing speed, and marginally the age. Conclusions:: Our results indicate that older adults with a higher baseline memory capacity and with more efficient cognitive resources were those who tended to benefit most from the training. The present study provides new avenues in designing personalized intervention according to the older adults’ cognitive profile.

KW - gain

KW - individual differences

KW - memory

KW - older adults

KW - predictors

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037986713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037986713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610217002691

DO - 10.1017/S1041610217002691

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

ER -