The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation

Chiara Renzi, Emiliano Ricciardi, Daniela Bonino, Giacomo Handjaras, Tomaso Vecchi, Pietro Pietrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual's reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand-about 15 cm from the starting position-vs. far from the hand-about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere59460
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 15 2013

Fingerprint

Sensory Feedback
hands
Parietal Lobe
Feedback
Hand
magnetic resonance imaging
cortex
brain
Motor Cortex
Hand Strength
Brain
Healthy Volunteers
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Availability
Networks (circuits)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation. / Renzi, Chiara; Ricciardi, Emiliano; Bonino, Daniela; Handjaras, Giacomo; Vecchi, Tomaso; Pietrini, Pietro.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 3, e59460, 15.03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Renzi, Chiara ; Ricciardi, Emiliano ; Bonino, Daniela ; Handjaras, Giacomo ; Vecchi, Tomaso ; Pietrini, Pietro. / The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation. In: PLoS One. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 3.
@article{bf1d2e928309442398e5811d24ea5127,
title = "The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation",
abstract = "In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual's reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand-about 15 cm from the starting position-vs. far from the hand-about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets.",
author = "Chiara Renzi and Emiliano Ricciardi and Daniela Bonino and Giacomo Handjaras and Tomaso Vecchi and Pietro Pietrini",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0059460",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Visual Control and Distance in Modulating Peripersonal Spatial Representation

AU - Renzi, Chiara

AU - Ricciardi, Emiliano

AU - Bonino, Daniela

AU - Handjaras, Giacomo

AU - Vecchi, Tomaso

AU - Pietrini, Pietro

PY - 2013/3/15

Y1 - 2013/3/15

N2 - In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual's reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand-about 15 cm from the starting position-vs. far from the hand-about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets.

AB - In the presence of vision, finalized motor acts can trigger spatial remapping, i.e., reference frames transformations to allow for a better interaction with targets. However, it is yet unclear how the peripersonal space is encoded and remapped depending on the availability of visual feedback and on the target position within the individual's reachable space, and which cerebral areas subserve such processes. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural activity while healthy young participants performed reach-to-grasp movements with and without visual feedback and at different distances of the target from the effector (near to the hand-about 15 cm from the starting position-vs. far from the hand-about 30 cm from the starting position). Brain response in the superior parietal lobule bilaterally, in the right dorsal premotor cortex, and in the anterior part of the right inferior parietal lobule was significantly greater during visually-guided grasping of targets located at the far distance compared to grasping of targets located near to the hand. In the absence of visual feedback, the inferior parietal lobule exhibited a greater activity during grasping of targets at the near compared to the far distance. Results suggest that in the presence of visual feedback, a visuo-motor circuit integrates visuo-motor information when targets are located farther away. Conversely in the absence of visual feedback, encoding of space may demand multisensory remapping processes, even in the case of more proximal targets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875022985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875022985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0059460

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0059460

M3 - Article

C2 - 23555037

AN - SCOPUS:84875022985

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e59460

ER -