The energy cost of cycling in young obese women

Claudio L. Lafortuna, Marco Proietti, Fiorenza Agosti, Alessandro Sartorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to evaluate the difference in the energy cost of submaximal cycling between normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) females, nine OB (age 23.2 years±1.6 SE, BMI 40.4±1.2 kg/m2) and nine NW (age 25.6 years±1.8, BMI 21.7±0.6 kg/m2) healthy young women were studied during a graded bicycle ergometer test at 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 W. At rest and at all workloads, oxygen uptake(V̇O2) was higher in OB than in NW women (Student's t test, P2 and anaerobic threshold were higher in OB women, and they also explained the higher oxygen pulse observed during submaximal exercise, but no difference was found when the values were adjusted for fat-free mass. While net mechanical efficiency (ME) was significantly lower in OB (ANOVA, P<0.05), delta ME was similar in both groups, indicating no substantial derangement of muscle intrinsic efficiency in obesity, but suggesting that the increased mass of body segments involved in cycling movements may be chiefly responsible for the higher energy cost of this type of exercise. Comparison of the actual V̇O2 presently measured with that predicted by available cycle ergometry equations at the different workloads indicated inaccuracy of various degrees ranging from 8.4 to -31.9%. It is concluded that the lower mechanical efficiency displayed by obese women in cycling has to be taken into account when prescribing exercise through methods predicting the metabolic load.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-25
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume97
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
Exercise
Workload
Weights and Measures
Oxygen
Anaerobic Threshold
Ergometry
Analysis of Variance
Obesity
Fats
Students
Muscles

Keywords

  • Bicycle ergometer
  • Exercise
  • Mechanical efficiency
  • Obesity
  • Oxygen uptake

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

The energy cost of cycling in young obese women. / Lafortuna, Claudio L.; Proietti, Marco; Agosti, Fiorenza; Sartorio, Alessandro.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 97, No. 1, 05.2006, p. 16-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lafortuna, Claudio L. ; Proietti, Marco ; Agosti, Fiorenza ; Sartorio, Alessandro. / The energy cost of cycling in young obese women. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2006 ; Vol. 97, No. 1. pp. 16-25.
@article{9bdddf5b52b74f2e9c807272f03a920c,
title = "The energy cost of cycling in young obese women",
abstract = "In order to evaluate the difference in the energy cost of submaximal cycling between normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) females, nine OB (age 23.2 years±1.6 SE, BMI 40.4±1.2 kg/m2) and nine NW (age 25.6 years±1.8, BMI 21.7±0.6 kg/m2) healthy young women were studied during a graded bicycle ergometer test at 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 W. At rest and at all workloads, oxygen uptake(V̇O2) was higher in OB than in NW women (Student's t test, P2 and anaerobic threshold were higher in OB women, and they also explained the higher oxygen pulse observed during submaximal exercise, but no difference was found when the values were adjusted for fat-free mass. While net mechanical efficiency (ME) was significantly lower in OB (ANOVA, P<0.05), delta ME was similar in both groups, indicating no substantial derangement of muscle intrinsic efficiency in obesity, but suggesting that the increased mass of body segments involved in cycling movements may be chiefly responsible for the higher energy cost of this type of exercise. Comparison of the actual V̇O2 presently measured with that predicted by available cycle ergometry equations at the different workloads indicated inaccuracy of various degrees ranging from 8.4 to -31.9{\%}. It is concluded that the lower mechanical efficiency displayed by obese women in cycling has to be taken into account when prescribing exercise through methods predicting the metabolic load.",
keywords = "Bicycle ergometer, Exercise, Mechanical efficiency, Obesity, Oxygen uptake",
author = "Lafortuna, {Claudio L.} and Marco Proietti and Fiorenza Agosti and Alessandro Sartorio",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-006-0137-5",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "16--25",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The energy cost of cycling in young obese women

AU - Lafortuna, Claudio L.

AU - Proietti, Marco

AU - Agosti, Fiorenza

AU - Sartorio, Alessandro

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - In order to evaluate the difference in the energy cost of submaximal cycling between normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) females, nine OB (age 23.2 years±1.6 SE, BMI 40.4±1.2 kg/m2) and nine NW (age 25.6 years±1.8, BMI 21.7±0.6 kg/m2) healthy young women were studied during a graded bicycle ergometer test at 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 W. At rest and at all workloads, oxygen uptake(V̇O2) was higher in OB than in NW women (Student's t test, P2 and anaerobic threshold were higher in OB women, and they also explained the higher oxygen pulse observed during submaximal exercise, but no difference was found when the values were adjusted for fat-free mass. While net mechanical efficiency (ME) was significantly lower in OB (ANOVA, P<0.05), delta ME was similar in both groups, indicating no substantial derangement of muscle intrinsic efficiency in obesity, but suggesting that the increased mass of body segments involved in cycling movements may be chiefly responsible for the higher energy cost of this type of exercise. Comparison of the actual V̇O2 presently measured with that predicted by available cycle ergometry equations at the different workloads indicated inaccuracy of various degrees ranging from 8.4 to -31.9%. It is concluded that the lower mechanical efficiency displayed by obese women in cycling has to be taken into account when prescribing exercise through methods predicting the metabolic load.

AB - In order to evaluate the difference in the energy cost of submaximal cycling between normal weight (NW) and obese (OB) females, nine OB (age 23.2 years±1.6 SE, BMI 40.4±1.2 kg/m2) and nine NW (age 25.6 years±1.8, BMI 21.7±0.6 kg/m2) healthy young women were studied during a graded bicycle ergometer test at 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 W. At rest and at all workloads, oxygen uptake(V̇O2) was higher in OB than in NW women (Student's t test, P2 and anaerobic threshold were higher in OB women, and they also explained the higher oxygen pulse observed during submaximal exercise, but no difference was found when the values were adjusted for fat-free mass. While net mechanical efficiency (ME) was significantly lower in OB (ANOVA, P<0.05), delta ME was similar in both groups, indicating no substantial derangement of muscle intrinsic efficiency in obesity, but suggesting that the increased mass of body segments involved in cycling movements may be chiefly responsible for the higher energy cost of this type of exercise. Comparison of the actual V̇O2 presently measured with that predicted by available cycle ergometry equations at the different workloads indicated inaccuracy of various degrees ranging from 8.4 to -31.9%. It is concluded that the lower mechanical efficiency displayed by obese women in cycling has to be taken into account when prescribing exercise through methods predicting the metabolic load.

KW - Bicycle ergometer

KW - Exercise

KW - Mechanical efficiency

KW - Obesity

KW - Oxygen uptake

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745477471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745477471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-006-0137-5

DO - 10.1007/s00421-006-0137-5

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 16

EP - 25

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 1

ER -